Jump to content

Barack Obama Elected President!


Max

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Obama stated on Anderson cooper, "that if he had heard what the pastor wright said about 9/11, he would of left the church."

I have a problem with that, because the topic of 9/11c was very [NAME NOT ALLOWED] at the time and now wouldn't he have found out from other congregation members or the pastor himself what he said. Its really hard to believe that BO didn't know where pastor wright stood on this issue.imo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Also I was watching GMA this morning an apparently obama knew how controversial and fiery his preacher was and told him he couldn't speak at his rally when he announced his candidacy for the president of the united states. The republican have all the ammo they need to tear him apart now. Like I said before it really hard to believe that obama didn't know about those statements, its possible that he didn't know but still I don't know if I buy it. I think he does need to go a step further and tear up his membership with the church. Wrights statements about hillary, condemning america, and american's being responsible for 9/11 are ridiculous. I go to a black church and my pastor does talk about social issues, but never are they as extreme and ridiculous as pastor wrights comments. For those who believe this is an attack on black churches I don't believe that, Wrights comments are his own and don't represent the black churches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Of course not. There are quite a few outstanding black churches in Oakland where the churchgoers are down to Earth, upstanding, and very nice people. They also practice what they preach in regards to religion and are not acting like pseudo Christians the way the Christian Taliban or the Christian Right do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That speech was a crock. Obama did everything except grovel. He can talk about race until this time next year, but he still won't ask why he has to do more apologizing for a supporter's remarks than Clinton and McCain have for theirs put together. It's probably that "luck" in being born black.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And that is your opinion to feel it was a crock. I don't. I thought it was wonderful, which means.....

We will have to agree to disagree.

If he acted like you wanted him to.......he wouldn't have to worry about the nomination. Becuasehe wouldn't get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

:rolleyes: Well, you just want to talk about what must be done to win - screw the integrity of the victory. I'd rather focus on the implications of Obama's words. This whole stunt was supposedly about addressing issues of race, but he wouldn't have done it if not for his pastor. For that reason, the speech was useless, because Jeremiah Wright isn't getting press for making racist statements. Obama said himself that he never heard the guy do such a thing. Connecting terrorist attacks we suffer to our foreign policies is neither inflammatory or unpatriotic. Saying that Hillary Clinton was never labeled with the n word is not problematic. Yet the media has focused on these ideas alone, and somehow they necessitate a reprimand of black churches, the civil rights generation, and anyone vocal about injustice. I don't need anybody drawing conclusions based on history to explain one man's comments. They wouldn't need to be said if they weren't applicable here and now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

IMO, I think ya'll are arguing a moot point. I understand your point stenbeck and agree with you to a certain extent (as I do with Roman as well). Why is it that Obama is always having to come out and apologize for things his supporters say. Him "denouncing" them isn't enough, people want...no they DEMAND an apology....yet we can't get the same from McCain and/or the Clinton camp. It is a double standard but unfortunately, that's the way things are.

People are genuinely upset over the comments, and feel he should have said something. I loved his speech, I think it was a damn good one and made a lot of good points.

Do I have that right stenbeck? Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Of course you have the right to your point of view, Ryan. Why wouldn't you? I'm not in the business of denying that to anyone, and I certainly reject the notion that one must be forced to agree. My source of frustration is conclusions with no reasoning to back them up.

Obama made the rounds on cable news outlets to squash this "scandal" before today, and yet that wasn't enough. He apparently must get on his knees and submit to the "outrage" more than any other candidate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I have not gone back to watch much of 1987, but from what I've seen lately, it doesn't feel like the writers or producers had any sort of plan. The show feels as if it's constantly in flux.  I will give it credit for this. It's watchable for the most part minus Lisa/Jamie which I find nearly unwatchable now.   I don't find Cheryl mousy. I think she has a lot of quiet strength, but she was saddled with the Scott romance which the writers did not invest in. She had a good friendship with Julie (also criminally underused), and her interactions with Ada were enjoyable as well. I also like Layman, but Spencer was extremely talented and when Cass returns, Schnetzer and Spencer have some wonderful scenes. Spencer also fits in with Alexander, Hogan, and Marie.  I'd forgotten just how much I missed seeing Wallingford. IT was so good to see him again. Even when they didn't have a major plot, Felicia/Cass/Wallingford/Mitch always brings a smile to my face.  
    •   Dani’s cute ass party planner. He gave me some tea but I was so drunk I don’t remember it.
    • NBC must have been grateful to have LHOTP, it's only hit and still strong after several seasons. Their next established show was Rockford Files at 45th. They didn't develop any comedies and relied on movies and mini series  which didnt establish viewer loyalty and habits. Their only new hit was mid season's Project UFO which debuted Feb up against Rhoda/On Our Own on CBS and How the West Was Won on ABC. It opened with a strong 36 share beating CBS and close to ABC as HTWWW had a 36 share over 3 hours. The next week UFO saw a respectable 32 share, then a 31 so it was slipping. A 28 share followed but a few weeks later it jumped back up to a 34. So no blockbuster but compared to what else they had, there was potential, So next season NBC sent it to Thursday up against Mork and The Waltons and it bombed.  They were smart to see potential in Chips, which took off on Saturdaysnext season. ABC was on a roll with Love Boat, 3's Company, Taxi, Eight is Enough adding to their hits. Their only real flops were Redd Foxx and San Pedro Beach Bums, an Aaron Spelling misfire. Like Redd Foxx, Harvey Korman was lured to ABC but his series was a filler that did well but was considered a time slot hit. Nancy Walker and Rob Reiner were also given series on the philosophy that not only were they popular names, their absence from popular shows like Sanford, Rhoda and All in the Family might weaken those shows. CBS were relying on old favorites. Betty White was strong the first few weeks then faded. Incredible Hulk was their strongest newbie. It was lucky for CBS that NBC was doing so badly or else some of their weaker shows would have really suffered.
    • That outfit looks like something Martin would wear lol.
    • Omg not we both ran into people from the show this weekend!
    • I guess he was let out the gates, because he's outside. 
    • Yup.  You can hate John all you want, but like seriously he was the cornerstone of the show for years.  So he should get a long ass funeral and burial and all the things because Drake and John deserve that.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      look who’s at a party I’m at
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy