Jump to content

Barack Obama Elected President!


Max

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 8.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

And Mulder, how do you think I feel, most likely having to votr for a woman who has another woman say that Obama is doing so well simply because he's half black, and the fact that Clinton won't get rid of said woman? That garbage doesn't belong in the Democratic Party, and what Clinto or her campaign don't seem to realize in their stupidity is that the very same black Americans she will need in November are the very same ones she's pissing off.

As far as just commenting........Hillary couldn't now get elected Head Pooper Scooper in St. Louis much less president after the way she has ran her campaign.

And Devoted.......I also find it interesting that you barely hold Hillary's feet to the fire on the stuff she and her campaign do.......but do hold Barack accountable for what he says. And, if you say that I don't do that with Obama......just go back earlier in this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Obama and Hillary are both in a dilemma because neither one will reach the delgate count necessary to be the nominee.

I don't know where you are coming up with this crap about me not coming down on Hillary. I post at another message board on politics about how I do not approve of everything she does, nor do I like everything about her. Have I not been vocal about it here? I do apologize if I have not but I choose what to say at every board I post. I make it clear in my signature that I like Hillary the best of all candidates so I will praise her more and critique the other candidates more (but I still criticize her and praise them if it is warranted). I have made it clear here how I did not like her comments about McCain being the more experienced leader because I find it BS. But I still support her since I feel she is the bst equipped to be president. Never have I also condoned the red phone ad since I found it silly and tacky at best...but I still won't give up support since her positives outweigh the negatives. As for Obama, haven't I recently been praising him, such as saying he has more judgment than McCain to be president? I also showed appreciation here when Obama said he was certain that neither Hillary nor someone from her camp sent out the pictures of Obama in a turban...but make no mistake about it, Obama is no Saint or the Second Coming as some people in the press have hailed him. I fault him for sending out false pamphlets to voters in Ohio regarding Hillary as well as lying about her writing in her book that NAFTA was a success (I read her book and nowhere does she say it is a success. She talks about Bill successfully pushing it through but not the bill itself being successful). But I still like Obama

Furthermore, I do not feel as if I have to explain anything to you. The fact that you threatened to suspend me for a month because I posted a message to a friend that was meant in humor speaks loudly of your priorities. Rather than take out your frustration on me and a couple of others in that thread (over humor, nonetheless. Noel posted a joke...me and another laughed about it while not directing anything at him. It was a convo amongst ourselves), why not get rid of the one with the agenda of purposely pissing people off with offensive crap?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

First, I got that crap from you. It now seems like you can say whatever you want, but damn anyone who speaks up for themselves.

Second, the warrning in the other thread was meant for everyone. YOU are the one who either keeps bringing in up or brings it up in other threads.

And, I asked you a question. If you respond like this......how do you expect anyone to listen to what you have to say?

And also, where is Hillary's outrage at GF's comments? Some half ass crap about how she disagrees? If she wins the nom, and gets her ass kicked in November, she'll have herself to blame. And, don't get ticked at me. Be mad at her for running a dirty campaign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There is an obvious lack of respect coming from Clinton and that bothers me. She patronizes this man, says he's not experienced and/or qualified enough to be President, yet wants him as her VP? That sounds like some bullshit. I keep saying that if the roles were revered, Obama would get major flack if he did the same [!@#$%^&*] that Hilary has been doing. Saying that Hilary may be his VP? Oh please, if he were in second place, the pundits would blast him for having delusions of grandeur and criticize him for trying to undermine the voters by misleading them into believing that a vote for him is a vote for her. Yet she can do the same, but he gets criticized when he responds to her antics? Double standard.

He has been VERY respectful of Senator Clinton. After he won Mississippi (you know, the state that doesn't mean anything now because he won it), he said he would support her in the fall if she happened to win the nomination, and also predicted a united Democratic party. He showed her respect when he said, "Obviously I think I would be the better nominee. But I have been careful to say that I think Senator Clinton is a capable person and that should she win the nomination, obviously I would support her." Yet the Clinton campaign doesn't give him that same respect.

Last week you got her advisors comparing Obama to Ken Starr. Why? Because he was going to be more critical of Senator Clinton? Oh my goodness, it's a witchhunt!! GMAFB. Then when one of Obama's people called Hilary a monster, she got her panties into a twist and was furious. The woman resigned, Obama denounced her comments (didn't "strongly disagree") and they moved on. Yet he can't get the same consideration when Hilary's people are talking out of their ass?

I'm so sick of this [!@#$%^&*]. Instead of having a respectful competition, Hilary is trying to undermine Barrack and is showing very poor conduct. The more she exhibits this kind of behavior, the more I don't want to vote for her. I can't put my support behind someone who plays dirty. The sad thing is, she and her people have been trying to beat down Senator BO for months now, to the point where he wouldn't even be a viable VP candidate, but now all of a sudden he may be because she realizes how much she will need him. Excuse me while I go find a bridge to get the !@#$%^&*] over Hilary's bullshit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What I think needs to happen now is for Hillary to ask Ferraro to resign. Good lord the woman is downright tacky to be stating that he got where he is due to skin color. No Geraldine! He is where he is today due to being intelligent, sophisticated, passionate, fiery, and a downright charismatic person.

I also agree with Ryan that Hillary should be more appreciative of Obama. She has, on a couple occasions, congratulated him for his wins but he also makes sure to congratulate her as well as throw support behind her if she winds up with the nomination. I do believe that she will be a big supporter of his if he gets the nomination but just has not been vocal about it as of now.

These two can really play off each other well, just like they have in recent debates...I sincerely hope that Obama is not dismissing the idea of being a VP if Hillary has the nomination...obviously, it would make more sense for him to be the presidential nominee if he has more delegates (both super and pledged combined). But now, he is also saying that he will support Hillary if she has the nomination. Could that mean he is willing to give the VP slot a try? He did not necessarily rule it out. I really want a Clinton/Obama ticket or the other way around

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

At least we finally see that Obama needn't attack Clinton. She or her representatives will eventually perform self-sabotage that makes Samantha Power look like Mother Theresa in comparison. Clinton is a neocon in liberal clothing, so there's no shortage of bigots lining up to toot her horn. Geraldine Ferraro said the same racist crap that she said about Jesse Jackson 20 years ago, but NO she's not a racist. The campaign's response was weak, given the number of times it has been in this position. Then she lies about the Obama campaign playing the race card, forgetting that she's catching heat because of the country's reaction to her silliness. Let Obama fail to REJECT AND DENOUNCE Louis Farrakhan though, and we'll see world wars 3, 4, and 5 waged amongst the politicians alone. As if this isn't enough, Clinton asserts that Florida and Michigan's votes should count if no replacement primaries are held. Nevermind the fact that her opponent abided by DNC rules that she expects to work around to hoard more delegates. It's arrogance only a Bush could love.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

*snore* and wrong

WASHINGTON — Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton did something Wednesday night that she almost never does. She apologized. And once she started, she didn't seem able to stop.

The New York senator, who is in a tight race with Illinois Sen. Barack Obama for the Democratic presidential nomination, struck several sorry notes at an evening forum sponsored by the National Newspaper Publishers Association, a group of more than 200 black community newspapers across the country.

Her biggest apology came in response to a question about comments by her husband, Bill Clinton, after the South Carolina primary, which Obama won handily. Bill Clinton said Jesse Jackson also won South Carolina when he ran for president in 1984 and 1988, a comment many viewed as belittling Obama's success.

"I want to put that in context. You know I am sorry if anyone was offended. It was certainly not meant in any way to be offensive," Hillary Clinton said. "We can be proud of both Jesse Jackson and Senator Obama."

"Anyone who has followed my husband's public life or my public life know very well where we have stood and what we have stood for and who we have stood with," she said, acknowledging that whoever wins the nomination will have to heal the wounds of a bruising, historic contest.

"Once one of us has the nomination there will be a great effort to unify the Democratic party and we will do so, because, remember I have a lot of supporters who have voted for me in very large numbers and I would expect them to support Senator Obama if he were the nominee," she said.

The Clintons long have enjoyed overwhelming support from black voters, but that has been eclipsed during the primaries and caucuses by enthusiasm and support for Obama, who has pulled huge margins among black voters. Arguments over the role of race and gender have flared up repeatedly throughout the contest between Obama, who would be the nation's first black president, and Clinton, who would be its first female one.

Earlier in the day, Hillary Clinton supporter and fundraiser Geraldine Ferraro gave up her honorary position with Clinton's campaign after she said in an interview last week that Obama would not have made it this far if he were white. Obama said Ferraro's remarks were "ridiculous" and "wrong-headed."

Of Ferraro's comment, Hillary Clinton told her audience: "I certainly do repudiate it and I regret deeply that it was said. Obviously she doesn't speak for the campaign, she doesn't speak for any of my positions, and she has resigned from being a member of my very large finance committee."

As first lady and senator, Clinton rarely cedes an inch to her critics. On the issue of her vote to authorize the Iraq war, for instance, she steadfastly has refused to apologize, coming close by saying she regrets it, despite calls from many anti-war voters in the party to make a more explicit mea culpa.

Her third conciliatory statement of the evening was more in keeping with that fighting stance.

Asked about the government's efforts in the Gulf States after Hurricane Katrina, Hillary Clinton turned an apology into a criticism of President Bush, who happened to be speaking at a Republican event in another room at the same hotel.

"I've said it publicly, and I say it privately: I apologize, and I am embarrassed that our government so mistreated our fellow citizens ... It was a national disgrace," she said.

Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No, wake up so that you're fully ALERT when you read this. You'll have to point out why a bolded snippet of my post is most indicative of how WRONG it is, given that you followed it with a news report that doesn't even relate to that sentence. :lol:

It's best that you get over your weird fetish for baiting me. You obviously can't shroud your agenda well enough to make it look like something other than an internet version of Tourette's syndrome. Reading your snide accusations and attacks in other people's quotes of your drivel is so damn OLD. When I have you ignored in my board preferences, I'm IGNORING you. I've been doing it ever since your arrogant assertion that Carolyn Hinsey should be ridiculed not for her commentary, but for her weight. Take the hint. Nobody that avoids you at the level I do could be causing you the brain atrophy I get credit for. It's ALL in YOUR head. But thankfully I have the good sense to check out the insinuations or rudeness you whip up for my benefit from time to time. For your own sake, stop lying about how I've caused problems on this board. Nobody ever had to threaten me with expulsion, thank you very much. The board moderators who continually remind you of your conduct aren't just pulling tirades out of their asses. I'd tell you that you can go back to snoring since I'm done, but we both know that you can't rest until you've lowered the bar for immaturity a few more times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I just wanted to throw my view out there on all this since i am a young first time voter. idk if anyone cares at all, but im board so whatever...

I have for the past 3 months watched CNN & MSNBC every night. Watched debates on you tube, and the view every day. I also have ready many articles and whatnot on the Internet and went to each Obama & Clinton's sites and read up and everything.

I am pulling for Clinton. I like her. Yes she has her faults, who doest? But i feel we KNOW what her faults are. with Obama he seems larger than life, like a superhuman who can do no wrong and is all perfect and knowing and just says the same thing over and over and over and over again. There is just something about him i do not like. I do not know what it is, but for whatever reason i just do not trust him to do a good job at all in the white house. I could be wrong, more shocking things in life have happened.

I do not know much about Mccain, is anyone here a supporter of his that can post some things or link to some things about him?

I still say Oprah should run the world.

but yeah, take it for what it is. i just thought id throw my view out there for everyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Eeek. I didn't know this either! I will say, though, even though they skimmed over a lot of Roger's past, I will give them props for not trying to turn him into a hero. Yeah, I was hoping we would get more 1986 episodes than were available on YT before, but now I'm wondering if I really want to see that. 
    • That's what Julie Hanan Carruthers is doing for BTG at the new studio in Atlanta, but JHC is credited. And @errol said JHC is working in a nonproduction capacity at Y&R.
    • I remember when the whole Missy Reeves controversy started in 2012.  She tweeted support of a business that had made homophobic statements. Greg Rikaart (who was on Y&R back then) publicly called her out on it, but was willing to reach out and speak with her. Article here: https://greginhollywood.com/greg-rikaart-talks-about-his-twitter-war-with-fellow-soap-star-melissa-reeves-over-anti-gay-chick-fil-a-73139 That being said, ten years later, on DAYS, in 2022, when they had they double wedding of Leo/CraigWesley and Gwen/Xander, Jack and Jennifer came to the wedding.  At that time, Missy Reeves was only intermittently available for DAYS. Jennifer was living "in Boston" and Cady McClain and Missy were each intermittently appearing as Jennifer, on the specific occasions when the show required a Jennifer to appear. Missy wasn't on contract and she could have said no. But she chose to appear as Jennifer for the gay wedding of Greg Rikaart's character.   So... I mean... I would assume they reached a détente behind-the-scenes. Missy still has her belief system but there's that.
    • That was one of the best grandslam finals.  Alcaraz comes all the way back down 2 sets to 0, and three match points in the 3rd set, to win it in a 5th set tie-break.  And the quality of play was excellent - so many great shots.  What a battle!
    • Indeed. I may try to watch it in full sometime, but not anytime soon... Mark played Sean Baxter for a few episodes when Courtney married Andy. Burke was either on Broadway or at OLTL at that time, I suppose.
    • Well, Josh was a horndog. LOL Yep. It was one of the first really weird things Reva did with her PPD. She became obsessed with the idea that Dylan and Sam should get married. Sam was only 17, and needed her parent's permission. Reva helped them leave town so they could go to a neighboring state where Sam was old enough. Ross, Billy and Josh stopped them, then Sam went to India to try and persaude Justin. Reva followed her and didn't tell Josh she was going. While Reva was gone, Josh advertised for nannies, and Harley applied. He ended up hiring someone else. But when Reva returned, she hired Harley because (in her weird mental state) she wanted someone she could trust with the kids (because she feared Josh was trying to get rid of her and that Vanessa wanted the children.). After Reva starts treatment, she asks Harley to stay until she's stronger because she's good with the kids. At the party, Reva starts going off the rails, insulting Justin and Josh hauls her to a private dining room to ask WTF. Reva starts confronting him about the "affair" with Vanessa, and he realizes she is weird. He locks her in the dining room and frees Mindy and Van from the ladies room (where Reva has locked them in). Van starts telling him that Reva attacked her and needs help.  Reva escapes out the window of the dining room and goes back to the party, climbs onto a table and starts a striptease. Josh gets her to stop, takes her home and after filling Ed in, decides to go to the doctor the next day. Reva then takes off and spends days running around town, coming on to a guy she thinks is Billy, Billy, Hamp, Frank and Roger.  Roger takes her to his apartment and takes nude pictures of her, which he tries to blackmail Billy with. He wants the deed to the land the Towers is on in exchange for them. (Billy had been left the deed by a sweet old lady who lost her home in the 5th street fire. Roger had stolen the deed from her before she died. After Roger took those pics of Reva, she saw him hide them, and took an envelope from the hiding place. She didn't realize she'd taken the deed and not the pictures.)  Anyway, Billy and Vanessa trick Roger into burning the pictures, claim the deed and at the Towers opening reveal that Billy owns the land and therefore the Towers. That's what led to Roger and Alex's breakup and Roger and Mindy's affair. Mark Lewis was on ATWT? 1986 is not a good year, storywise. No bueno. Muy no bueno.
    • All the time they spent trying to make viewers feel sorry for Chad only for him to not even last that long. I wonder if they knew Richard Burgi was going so quickly. You're right about Josie replacing Cheryl. On paper, this should have made sense, given all the ties Josie had to the canvas, but I did prefer Cheryl. There was something very synthetic about Alexandra Wilson.  I suppose even if she did have some fans they were just so used to getting rid of people left and right, so she was more collateral damage. As you said above I do wonder what the plans were for Peggy Lazarus. I think AWHP mentioned her once telling Peter that Peggy Lazarus wasn't her real name. Maybe she would have been another Carl moll... Rebecca Hollen never did get her due in her soap roles.
    • So true...Hackney might have had a story on FC with Richard being an old lover of his, but reveals herself to be a Cartel member and blackmails Richard with something into doing her dirty work  LOL. But of course Richard had his hands full with the double trouble sisters Ms. Jones and Ms. Braxton that season.

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy