Jump to content

OLTL: Debating Ron Carlivati & The Show


Recommended Posts

  • Members

True fans have left daytime, and most of them ain't returning. Why hasn't GL surpassed Y&R? Why can't GH give B&B a run for its money? Why is OLTL reaching record lows every month since September? Why has DOOL lost the most viewers since 2003? I guess the better question would be: Why dont people care about daytime anymore?

What is best for daytime? Optimism or realism?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 110
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

because in daytime its all about being loyal to your show. fact is Y&R has had the most people watching for like 20 years, and yes a lot of quit but a lot still do. my grandma for one watchs - and she hates it - why? because shes done it forever, shes not gonna stop now. GL has no chance of passing YR, so thats a stupid q. GH has given BB a run for it in the recent past. but GH cant hold there sweeps audiance. Days sucks - and has for 8 years. people dont care anymore because of cable, hbo, the internet, busy lifes, going out, working, other things - and daytime sucks. why should they care?

as for whats best for daytime. nither of those is - whats best is change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Jay Jay Jay....put that thinking cap back on and see the lame pattern. It swoops in every now and then, posts threads that deliberately piss others off, and then leaves for maybe a day or two (I wonder if that life is a whirlwind! LOL) but it does manage to have the time to respond to all the posts that have been written! I am tired of being pessimistic and all but I, like you, am sick of this little agenda. Is it possible for someone to be this boring and predictable? Well I guess so

And I can almost guarantee you that half the stuff is copied somewhere, you know like from the obituaries or those opinion columns. After "reading" about two or three of them, it became clear to me. What a whirlwind, huh? :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ru, you don't get it. People do care about realism and they do care about daytime. They just don't agree with you about One Life to Live. You can do all of the above and still appreciate OLTL, whether you like it or not.

All of ABC has dropped in the last few months. OLTL is by far the best show on it and while it is not perfect, a lot of people in the audience seem to have responded to it positively.

If you don't like it, don't watch it, but you need to give up on this thread in which you campaign for you and/or a certain someone to get the job. It's not a "debate" thread, it's you haranguing about One Life to Live and why you can't get the writer of your choice, whether that is you, or a certain someone, or one and the same. You're transparent, and you're boring. You're far more boring than OLTL. Please stop. Stop trying to create more "questions" to prolong your dumb thread which was never about any of us and all about you. Have some dignity.

BTW, any writer as predictable as you will never be hired for the soaps. They already have enough people there doing your particular job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yep that too! I try hard not to be THAT pessimistic in my life and if I ever am I always tell friends and family to knock me upside the head with a brick and get me back to reality :)

I wonder if Ru will now start a thread complaining about my lack of manners and not being a gentleman. Because trust me, there is not one gentleman like bone in my body. Tuffy the dog next door is more of a gentleman than me. And I am not exaggerating :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Watching the cult of Fetterman collapse is one of the few political bright spots for me. The best part  is watching all the people who built him up now decide they want to tear him down. I'll be fascinated to see how this ends for him. https://buckscountybeacon.com/2025/05/pennsylvanias-democratic-senator-john-fetterman-raises-alarms-with-outburst-at-meeting-with-union-officials/

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Long ago, this Rachel fan channel uploaded a number of clips of Rachel with Felicia during the alcoholism story, and this one in particular stands out for me. 

      Please register in order to view this content

      And then you have this scene, which is the dark mirror of the above, especially the final moment: By the late '80s, especially after Wallingford's death, those times were gone, and Donna Swajeski added further misery to Felicia with the Gold Street backstory. Luckily, after a bit of time the show found a good framing for this new twist on Felicia. The stories with finding and losing a love from her past, learning that a woman she hated was the daughter she'd spent years searching for, sinking into alcoholism, they all fit into the type of material suited for the '40s and '50s screen goddesses.  When Dano tried some of this old weepy type of material when she went back to ABC, it mostly fell flat, as the atmosphere wasn't the same and her character always felt shoehorned in. It worked perfectly at this period on AW because you had Iris, you had Rachel, you had Donna - you had a number of tough-but-vulnerable women of a certain age, most of them grandmothers by this point, but still trying to find love, find themselves. This is what AW could have had earlier if they hadn't dumped Pat and Alice, but better late than never. This is an approach you saw more often on British soaps than on US soaps, which for a number of years respected women in that age group. Both UK and US soaps have done away with this, both countries having the ladies devolve into perpetual ingenues (with added doses of endlessly self-aware camp in the UK) or just being shipped off entirely.  You could even see that on AW with the treatment of Iris (shipped off, never to be mentioned again, too old to return), Donna (repeatedly humiliated and crippled), Felicia (regressed into degrading herself with married John), Rachel (mother to newborn twins, put into lengthy periods of trauma through her new relationship with Carl). 
    • I'm of a certain age where I caught some of Upton's final year and it was not great but Jean Holloway was worse. All I remember is Bambi, Bambi, Bambi!
    • Yes, of course, all of those servants added to the overall picture at AW & also people had relationships with those servants! I like it when Anita asks after one of the servants at the club, how their children are doing & like that. 
    • Great scenes between Marlena and EJ today. Paula and Jeanne are making EJ have more depth than Ron had during his long drawn out tenure.
    • Might as well say it, Minority opinion, granted, but I like Joss & I'm okay with this WSB story & i hope that Emma will be their next recruit & she & Joss can be partners.
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven  The Arlene/Ben/Betsy triangle is one I wish I could see for myself as on paper it doesn't tend to excite me but I can see how well-constructed it was. I wish I could see the Rick/Meg relationship too, although I wish they'd had him genuinely fall for Meg after he gets together with Cal. The whole Brooke/Deacon/Bridget story on B&B was horribly damaging to Brooke as a character but it was dramatically very sound because I could completely believe Deacon would fall for messy and vulnerable Brooke after finally settling down with the more docile Bridget.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy