Members DrewH Posted May 23, 2007 Members Share Posted May 23, 2007 Greg's right. Specifics are not important. When we know the specifics, there is no intrigue or surprise. Today, we know all of the sh*t that's going to happen weeks before it does. What's the point of tuning in? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members KLN Posted May 23, 2007 Members Share Posted May 23, 2007 Oh, I'm all for vague previews. I'm a spoiler whore, but I can recognize how spilling the beans too early can damage the soaps in the long-run. It's a big problem. However, my "wait and see" approach has nothing to do with lack of details. It has to do with lack of optimism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members King Posted May 23, 2007 Members Share Posted May 23, 2007 I AGREE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members MrsMahaney Posted May 24, 2007 Author Members Share Posted May 24, 2007 Thanks Toups! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members CSW Posted May 24, 2007 Members Share Posted May 24, 2007 Isn't this just more of what other spoilers have already told us, but with an editorial spin? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members RionPassions Posted May 24, 2007 Members Share Posted May 24, 2007 Remember who wrote that week? Oh yeah...it was JER!! :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Rudolpho Meradi Posted May 24, 2007 Members Share Posted May 24, 2007 I must agree there with you. I think JER did write some good things too. August 2003-March 2004 was very good. And September 2005-February 2006 was pretty good too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DAYSisHOT Posted May 24, 2007 Members Share Posted May 24, 2007 Tanya Boyd on contact sounds great. I love her! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members KevC1980 Posted May 24, 2007 Members Share Posted May 24, 2007 Tanya Boyd on contract would be cool..the actress does deserve it..She's been one of the bright spots the past few months..and I'm glad Victor will be back... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members PhoenixRising05 Posted May 24, 2007 Members Share Posted May 24, 2007 If true and Boyd is on contract, that is good news. Victor being onscreen more tells me he is behind a certain baby's disappearance. I wasn't asking for too many specifics. I just wanted something to grasp or maybe an example. That's all. Spoilers are ruining soaps and I hope they do limit them so character and couple fans have to watch everyday to see if their faves are on. Limiting spoilers also helps enjoy the show better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members KLN Posted May 24, 2007 Members Share Posted May 24, 2007 If Victor is behind Claire's disappearance, I'm going to scream. For a couple of reasons. One, the only reason Victor wanted to get Claire in his clutches was for Phillip. Why would be how hide Claire from him? Unless Victor tells Phillip and Phillip decides to keep quiet. Either way, I'm so OVER anything involving Claire. The entire Shawn/Belle/Phillip saga has been driven by Claire since the day Shawn/Belle screwed with hypothermia. Enough! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DrewH Posted May 24, 2007 Members Share Posted May 24, 2007 I think Victor keeping Claire from everyone is for Philip. In Victor's eyes, keeping Claire hidden will make Philip see what she really means to him and it will make Philip's love and desire for Claire stronger. Then, Victor will reveal that he has Claire to Philip and will encourage Philip to take Claire out of the country. Then, it will be up to Philip to decide what to do. Will he take Claire and keep Shawn and Belle in the agony that he's been feeling, or will he do the right thing and tell Shawn and Belle? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Keith Posted May 24, 2007 Members Share Posted May 24, 2007 As dark as Victor got last year, does anyone really think he's going to just accept this truce? No way in hell. As much as he's done this for Philip, he has his own agenda, too, IMO. He's bitter because Bo never embraced him as his father, and he's angry that Shawn gets to play proud papa to a little girl that, in his eyes, belongs to his kid. Major pride kick here. So, honestly, if anyone else has taken Claire, I'll sh!t bricks, because I've loved the more gothic Victor, and I want to see more of it. At the same time, I so hear you Kenny. This Claire saga is beyond stretched out, and it needs to be over. I just think this is one last aspect of the story that needs to be told. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members PhoenixRising05 Posted May 24, 2007 Members Share Posted May 24, 2007 Watch tomarrow's show and there is one line of dialogue that shows why Victor has such a interest in this Claire thing. To me, it proves he is behind this. Hell, I will tell you since I read it on prevuze. Victor says he wants Claire to take her "rightful place in the Kiriakis empire." That to me screams that Victor is not going to accept this and that he will be behind this. I am over the island story but the Shawn/Belle/Philip story is still good if they stay in Salem with their family around them. It only got bad when they were isolated IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DrewH Posted May 24, 2007 Members Share Posted May 24, 2007 It's a shame when babies rule daytime. Miranda and Little Adam on AMC/OLTL, Cabot and Johnny on ATWT, Taylor and Nick's unborn baby on B&B, Claire on DAYS, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.