Jump to content

DAYS: Honestly, was the Salem Stalker story rewritten?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I think it was definately re-written in some areas.

I believe the killer was gonna be Hattie as the show even suggested....and, months later, like in either late Summer or Fall, we would learn Marlena was alive and it was Hattie who died, which would be explained n a JER-way.

Because, either way, I believe Deidre would not have been the show for long.

Victor's death was also a little strange. I would think if they were gonna kill him, they wouldn't have done it with Jan. But, it also would've probably changed the whole Nicole/Crystal Galore scheme too.

I think there was alot re-written.....mabye even more than we know/speculate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 19
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Okay, I'll add my two cents. Ya talked me into it. :lol:

I believe the story was re-written because Corday panicked/came to his senses (whatever your opinion might be). Although for some people the murders were thrilling drama, there's no denying that part of the show's heart was being cut out. You don't get rid of long-term characters like that without the audience being up in arms (look at All My Children, where they're about ready to stage a riot thanks to Dixie's death).

Had the dead stayed dead, the show most likely would have slid in the ratings and never recovered. When 14 characters were written out in 1980, the show's Nielsens plunged by about three points and it took two years to get those numbers back.

It's just me, but I think the audience reaction to losing some of the characters forced Corday to take a long, hard look at this story and wonder if it was really worth it. When characters like Roman, Doug and Alice were written out, I bolted as a viewer... then came back when it was revealed this was all going to be a hoax. I can imagine there were many other viewers ready to switch channels (which I suspect most did after the anti-climax revelation that Marlena was the "killer").

Whatever the case, the damage has been undone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, it was rewritten...by Reilly. He rewrited it at weekly basis because there was never any real story or plan behind it. He´d seen that accident with white tigger, so he writed it in. He´d seen some stupid B horror movie on his flat screen or an article in mag, he immediatelly put it in. I think it´s ridicolous to try to analyze his plans from dialogs or scenes which was put together only to have a maximum effect at the time, but there was nothing behind them, like those singing children or the red moon bad sign.

I´M pretty sure Reilly always wanted to bring those characters back, because he loves triangles and he murdered halves of all popular couples, plus some veterans to make it more shocking. But that was the whole plan. Everything between, from the way characters died, through the island and the castle was pure improvization patched together only so the remaining ones have enough of time to move on and fall in love again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Hahhahahahaha, so NOT true, Jane.

Anyone who watched Reilly's first years at "Days" (the first time) knows he has things VERY well planned out. And like three years of "Passions" was written before the first show even premiered. (It's something like that, if it's not the exact number.)

No, I believe that the show HAD A PLAN. Like Reilly WOULD. And I believe the rumors that leaked about the original plan, where it had to do with voo doo or some evil spirit or something -- which made sense.

Have we all forgotten how Marlena said, 'Everyone in Salem will DIE'?!!! She didn't say, "Maggie, Jack, Caroline, blah blah blah" will die. She said "EVERYONE."

There's something very suspicious and very strange about that line. And remember how she said it too -- she wasn't really herself. She APPEARED, as a SPIRIT or something, to Celeste.

The children singing, the red moon, it ALL had significance. Corday just screwed it ALL up when he forced the rewrite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's so obvious to me that it was re-written. I don't believe JERk had any intention of bringing the victims back to life. That was all Corday's doing, IMO. But then again, I'd rather not go over this, as there are SOOO many plot holes that can be discussed here.

And for the record, I hated the Salem Stalker storyline, from beginning to end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Agreed. The Emmys next year are gonna be a pretty tough competition and I hope we get a Days sweep lol  Not only does Deidre deserve a nomination for these last few weeks, but I also think Paul Telfer, Raven Bowens, Carson Boatman, Dan Feuerriegel and Alison Sweeney have good chances as well.
    • It’s not about a lack of faith and trust in MVJ, it’s about a a lack of faith and trust in Ron Carlivati, who I think can be very sneaky and manipulative when he wants to be.  And, all that “He’s just a breakdown writer” talk never changed my mind about anything, because at Days, it was “just a breakdown writer” that gave us some of the worst episodes I’ve ever seen. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy