Jump to content

ABC: Why no cast cuts at GH?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Both AMC and OLTL have undergone, and continue to undergo, massive cast cuts. Yet, with the exception of one cheap actor I can think of (who I won't name here) GH has not suffered the same fate. In fact, it brought back Genie Francis and put truckloads of money into promoting and producing Laura's story.

Errol stated a while back that ABC has slashed the budgest of the ABC soaps. So why does GH go merrily along as AMC and OLTL crawl pathetically towards cancellation? Leslie C, Stuart Damon and Jackie Zeman all remain on contract!

Do you think it's true that AMC and OLTL are shouldering GH's budget burdens? It wouldn't surprise me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

GH only seems to cut clear failed characters from time to time, whereas OLTL and AMC take out beloved people. I agree I think it's curious. Especially since when she first came to GH and had power, Jill Farren Phelps wanted to eliminate Bobbie and a lot of other people for her new guard led by Jensen Buchanan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Are you saying that you want those GH vets to be cut? Unlike AMC and OLTL, GH doesn't really fire their vets, they just don't use them. And also unlike AMC and OLTL, though we may get tired of seeing the same characters, at least it's not a bunch of damn newbies. The budget has been cut at GH too and I wouldn't be surprised if you saw some of the younger set leave (i.e. Lindze Letherman, Kirsten Storms).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I just see it as a flip from a time back. I remember when GH was the one to cut it's vets first. They took Rachel Ames and Anna Lee both off contract. Rachel Ames was ABC daytimes longest running performer at the time. Anna Lee was it's oldest. At this time, OLTL was cutting some vets, but AMC was still holding on to all of theirs.

Later GH would cut John Ingle but he chose to leave instead of stick around for it. Thankfully they were able to get him back. They also fired Brad Maule, and even though they keep Leslie Charleson, Stuart Damon & Jacklyn Zeman they hardly use them. I would not be shocked to hear in the near future that they have been asked to go to recurring status.

As to them getting Genie Francis and some others. It all boils down to their stays being limited. Hiring someone for a short time is far different than giving someone a contract. With a contract they get paid even if they don't work. Genie Francis is not getting paid what she would if she was on contract. I am sure she is getting a nice price per episode, but it is not what she would get as a contract player. Plus they probably are spending less on her than if they had done another big stunt thing with the special effects and all.

None of the ABC shows have a great record with the use of vets right now. But I agree with Ryan at least GH is not full of newbies. That is the only thing that I give Guza and Phelps any real credit for right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I do think that Frons favors GH and that is what makes him a horrible leader. He is neglecting AMC and OLTL and they are just as an important part of his job as GH. In fact, a good businessmen will concentrate on fixing the weakest parts. He is completely destroying ABC daytime by not being proactive and taking care of ALL of his soaps. He is not doing his job and he should be fired because of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

GH has always had good luck with casting. I am not sure who their Casting Director is now but he/she seems to be good in that department.

I think the weakest performer they have now is Kirsten Storms.

As to Alicia Leigh Willis, I am saying that you are, but I think most people hated the character and think that Alicia was bad. Alicia is a very good actress. Her last week on the show, she really delivered. But her character was so bad, and so many people associated the character with the actress, and that is bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • Andrew sure has hard nips.
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy