Jump to content

Ann Coulter


Scott

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

The difference between Coulter and Moore is I find that Moore actually has facts and views that seem to support themselves and actually have valid points, plus he actually does know how to humor people without having to really resort to ad hominem attacks (case in point: the guy has never been sued before for slander or libel whereas Coulter has already been accused of such a crime)

The very fact that I dislike Coulter has nothing to do with her speaking her mind....when one claims that she regrets McVeigh not going into the New York Times building that is where I draw the line and call a time out...actions like those are clearly uncalled for and actually can get you into major trouble these days but to just pass it off as speaking your mind actually minimizes the amount of damage those comments really have on people. What would this world be like if we did not have actual news outlets like The New York Times to report actual news media stories? Given how New York City already suffered a terrorist attack in 1993 at the World Trade Center makes it all the more reasonable for people, like Coulter, to keep their opinions about any other NYC landmark to themselves

The reason why most of us do not say anything that Coulter does is simply due to how we often learn from history whereas she clearly does not.....what would be the point of invading countries, killing their leaders, and converting to Christianity? Heinous acts have been committed over the years in countries like England and Rome in the name of religion and sorry to burst Coulter's bubble but Christianity happens to be one of those religions! It was our very own history of revolting against the system set up in England that got us to be our very own country full of thinking human beings who can establish order without that kind of influence and therefore the Founding Fathers saw it fit that each religion ought to be respected and to not mix them into government since over time history has taught us that political leaders often utilize religious doctrines to justify killing

I also do not find someone so vile and disgusting like Coulter to be entertaining in the least bit and she merely just gets off believing in the crap that has been instilled in her and writes books to which I find my eight year old second cousin has far more decency and writing skills in her

What I find interesting about Coulter is this bias she shows against liberal women and how if women did not have the right to vote then all presidents in history from Goldwater to the present would be Republican....does she not get that we rebelled against a monarchy? If it were up to her, America would be just a one party system and fortunately here we have rights to select through multiple parties (Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, American Independent, Green)

Perhaps next month will be a light at the end of the tunnel for this nation and we let the Democrats have a chance to present THEIR vision for success in Iraq, economy, women's rights, civil liberties, transportation, education, national security (BTW we are not any safer than the weeks leading up to 9/11 that is a FACT!), homeland security, immigration reform

I still say to this day that with all the hatred that he preaches against homosexuals, terrorists (I consider Bush a terrorist-look it up in the dictionary and it actually has some truth to it), the Constitution (Dubya himself even stated once that it is nothing more than a god damn piece of paper-sorry but I can't take a politician seriously if he finds the document that has held this country together for 200+ years just a mere piece of paper)...I am just shocked that he has not been assassinated-you look at the attempt made on Reagan, who still was not the best president, and come to think wow it's hard to believe that since history is pretty much repeating itself that one attempt has yet to be made on this lame duck president who is known to rig elections in his favor, ignore briefings from the CIA on Bin Laden (of course to the Cons it is all Clinton's fault to which I say baloney since he hunted him down more vigorously than this current administration ever has.....I can only imagine what would have happened if he helped McVeigh or anybody else involved in the Oklahoma City bombing escape the country...recall Bush permitted Saudis to fly back to their homeland when 15 of the 19 hijackers were in fact Saudi and not Iraqi

Let Bush, Rove, Rice, and Cheney out unprotected in the streets of New York City, San Francisco, Chicago, Newark, Boston, Seattle, Las Vegas....odds are all four of them would only last about one minute apiece

Cowards all of them and now look at the debt that this country is now in for the next president to try and make up for and yet for some odd reason these baffoons still have people supporting them....just shocks me

as to how dumbfounded some people truly are

Okay done-that felt good B)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sometimes I think that what she says is an act. Or at least it's very exaggerated. But even if that were true, that still doesn't help that a lot of people actually believe what she says. If I were a Republican, I would be ashamed that so many people in my party actually support her. It seems like they only support her b/c she's an attractive woman, and don't really read or listen to what she says.

I attend a women's college that is extremely feminist and radical in terms of reproductive, gender, and social issues, but last year a significant percentage of students (about 50) actually went to see Ann Coulter give a talk in Boston...and it wasn't as some protest, but rather b/c they were legitimate fans of hers. All of them "aspire" to be housewives and are actually looking for future husbands by going to the near-by Ivy-Leagues and other co-ed colleges on weekends. It's quite scary b/c it's just a total regression back to the 1950s. Soon they'll be giving us etiquette classes and lessons on how to balance a book on our heads while serving drinks. :rolleyes: They also tried to ban the school from showing a production of The Vagina Monologues b/c, according to them, it was sexist as it associated women only w/ their vaginas. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Needless to say, the school still ran the production. It was quite a big to-do on campus b/c, even though 50 out of 2500 students doesn't seem like a lot, they actually control the college newspaper and have a lot of ways to send their messages to other people both on-and-off campus. They also get along well w/ the administration here b/c they agree w/ them on an extremely controversial issue that has occurred on-campus in recent years, and has caused a lot of resentment from the students to the administration.

It's really scary just how "dead" feminism is in this country. I still can't believe that any woman my age would applaude another woman who thinks that only men should have the right to vote. It's one thing to be against Roe v. Wade. I think anyone can understand the other side's rationale on abortion. But who in their right mind (that's not over 60 at least!) would want to get rid of the 19th amendment? Are we going to return to a voting system where only white men w/ property can vote? It's not as if women are more "liberal" than men anymore. More and more middle-aged and retiree-age women vote conservately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Moore uses what he THINKS are facts.

And it is true, the wives of 9/11 should NOT blame the president..Clinton or Bush.

Now for the other stuff she said, it was wrong, but if liberals can call Bush a killer and be allowed too, she is allowed to spew her garbage as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No actually they should blame the president when he had ample opportunity to prevent this attack from taking place and had he read the briefing given to him on 8/6/01 by the CIA then it would at least wake him up to the possibilities of an attack on this nation and also getting him and the entire cabinet to work with counterterrorist experts in the best method available to prevent Bin Laden from committing his acts of terrorism as he did on the USS Cole but nope instead he chose to ignore the briefing and utilized the attacks to plan his only little war (more like a vendetta if you ask me) with zero exit strategy and about as many missions as Liz Taylor had husbands (one was to find WMDs...other was to rid the world of Saddam Hussein...then it became about bringing democracy to Iraq....then about installing a new govt in Iraq....but overall to me it was about capturing their oil supply and feeding his pockets)

They have every right to blame the president for his failures as is the true belief of a democracy-to question leadership at times of carelessness

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Gosh how I would love to live in Canada right now....so much more of a comforting and nurturing atmosphere but then of course return to the United States once we get a suitable president in D.C. ;)

How is the weather like up North right about now? Viva Canada! ;)

Oh and about Bush being a killer....well truth of the matter is he is and deliberately lied and fabricated information and many people died in the process...if there is any justice in this world he would either be impeached or rotting in prison while at the same time paying a significant fine to recover from the huge deficit that we are now in all thanks to him and his little games of war

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

We had a fluke hail / snow storm for a couple hrs in London today :( Nothing stuck thankfully. And things arent so great politically here now with Harper in office. We now have actual Canadian troops in iraq, not peacekeepers - troops. I miss having a prime minister that would tell the US to f*k itself like Chrétien would.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yup lets blame the Presidents, because those briefings told them WHO was attacking, When, Where and what time and what airlines...are you people honestly going to think that could have been prevented?

I do believe there were faults on all levels, failures of both parties and enough finger pointing to last a lifetime.

But no one will ever stop every attack at all points of the world no matter how hard you try.

If you believe that, please run for office and get the job done. To blame either President, either party or any country is just flat wrong and it is sad that politics has come to that.

If you want to live in Canada...no one is stopping you.

I prefer to live in a country that has balls though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

America cannnot always be the country that tells others what to do and when to do it. We fight too many battles that we have no business being in, and we are more hated than ever. Sometimes our "balls" have to go limp once in a while.

When will Bush and his blind followers, including Coulter, wake up and realize this? How many more soldiers will have to die in our president's personal vendetta of a war? Enough is enough. I just hope America is smart for the 2008 election, God knows they weren't in 2004.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Well, her staff pointing out the movie connection never seemed to stop Long from using those plots.  She was right about Vanessa--she needed a man who loved her, which she'd never really had up to then. But as others have pointed out, Long borrowed heavily from Taming of the Shrew to get it done. (which while I kinda disputed that, I get more now, having watched Kiss Me Kate a few times since.)
    • "Holly had her share of the blame..." NO, she did NOT. WOW. That's what you get for trying to be fair and giving these people the benefit of the doubt! The Rita rape episodes do not seem to be available. It sounds like Calhoun thought it was not dramatized, but it was. I saw it when it aired. Yes, it's close to 50 years ago, and memories aren't 100% reliable. I also know that Zaslow reportedly complained that it was written too much like a seduction and that's why the Dobsons portrayed Holly's rape differently. Maybe it started like a seduction and she rejected him and that's when it turned violent. I don't remember that part, if it exists. What I do remember is that Roger threw Rita so violently to the floor that she hit her head. They showed him coming at her from her point of view and he looked all fuzzy. It was an act of violence, not a seduction. Rita kept it a secret until it looked like Roger might be acquited, and then finally admitted it. She didn't make it up, it definitely was not a ploy.
    • I was actually referencing another scene between Roger and Alex, which I think is right after they marry.  But yeah---I'm not really impressed with Calhoun's reasoning. Or the "both recall it wasn't unprovoked" line. Wasn't Holly trying to leave him when he raped her? Oy vey.
    • I know we have discussed the location of Bay City in the Another World thread and the fact that originally Irna conceived of it as being the real Bay City MI, and it was later writers that treated it as a fictional Bay City [probably IL]. This article seems to suggest that that idea was well-established by 1981. I wonder when it started.
    • Desert Sun, 22 December 1983 Guiding Light’ writer looks for fresh ideas By TOM JORY Associated Press Writer NEW YORK (AP) - “Guiding Light” has been a daytime companion for millions since 1937, starting on radio and switching to TV after 15 years. Can anything new, really new, ever happen to the Bauers or the Reardons or any of the other folks in Springfield? “I get really upset,” says Pamela Long Hammer, principal writer for the CBS soap opera since March, “because I’ll come up with this neat scenario and someone will say, ‘That’s like “Strangers on a Train.’” “I think, ‘They keep stealing my material.’ “The way I figure it,” she says, “there are only so many stories in the world. It’s the characters who keep the show new and exciting. All of our stories come from them: I don’t come up with a plot, and then work a character into it.” Continuity is important. Someone out there surely knows all that’s happened, to everyone on the show, in 46 years. How about Miss Long Hammer? "Nope. I care about what our core families have been doing,” she says. “I’m always interested in what happened to Bert Bauer (played since 1950 by Charita Bauer) 20 years ago, but as far as going back and reading scripts, no. “Others on the show keep track,” she says. “I’ll suggest something, and be told, ‘You don’t remember, but five years ago, they had this terrible fight. They would never speak to one another now.”’ Miss Long Hammer, a former Miss Alabama who came to New York as an aspiring actress in 1980, began writing for daytime television while playing Ashley on NBC’s “Texas.” She eventually wrote herself out of the story. Her staff for “Guiding Light” includes nine writers, among them her husband, Charles Jay Hammer, whom she met while both worked on “Texas.” NBC dropped “Texas” after two seasons, and episodes from the serial currently are being rerun on the Turner Broadcasting System’s cable-TV SuperStation, WTBS. Gail Kobe, who was executive producer of “Texas,” now has the same job on “Guiding Light.” And Beverlee McKinsey, who played Iris Carrington in “Another World” on NBC, and later in "Texas,” will join the Light” cast of the CBS soap in February. Miss Long Hammer is reponsible for the long-term story, which can mean looking ahead 18 months or more. Staff writers deal with specifics, including the scripts for individual episodes. She says she draws on “imagination and instinct” for the “Guiding Light” story. Often, that involves inventing new characters. “‘I look at Vanessa (Maeve Kinkead), one of our leading ladies,” Miss Long Hammer says. "What could make the audience care more about her? “Then I think, ‘Why can’t she find a man she can love, who will also love her?’ Voila, here comes Billy Lewis (Jordan Clarke). “Another example,” she says, “is Alan Spaulding (Christopher Bernau). All of a sudden, he’s got a sister no one ever knew about. “They come complete,” says Miss Long Hammer of the serial’s characters, including the new ones. “We know who they are and where they came from long before the viewer gets all that information. That’s one of the most interesting things about daytime, the complexities of the characters.” The writers make a big effort to keep the show contemporary, and four of the leading players are in their late teens or early 20s Judi Evans, who plays Beth Raines, Kristi Tesreau (Mindy Lewis), Grant Aleksander (Philip Spaulding) and Michael O’Leary (Rick Bauer). “Guiding Light,” longevity notwithstanding, is a moderate success by that ultimate yardstick of the industry; ratings. The show is behind only “General Hospital,” “All My Children” and “One Life to Live,” all on ABC, and CBS’ “The Young and the Restless,” among soaps. And Miss Long Hammer says she’s convinced writing is the key to even greater achievement. “When I say I love the characters, it’s not a light thing,” she says. “I think what the audience senses is an enthusiasm and an energy among the people who do the show.”
    • I initially read this as Marilyn Manson and did a double take.  Thanks for the screen grabs. The outfits are horrible. Somehow Victoria's Miss Piggy dress is the best. Ashley looks like a French madam bent on revenge, and Abby looks like she hot glued lace scraps to her garbage bag.
    • LOL...I do have the vaguest of memories of Katherine driving her and Phillip Sr to his death. But I don't recall Katherine being as over-the-top as Reva. Surprisingly, I don't even think Brenda Dickinson's Jill was---although lord knows Brenda probably is a real-life Reva. I have read the recaps of earlier Roger, and it surprised me that he doesn't love Holly. He had an affair with Hillary (SHOCK, I tell you, SHOCK when I read that one) while married to her.  Thanks to the cast turnover, other than Jerry and Maureen Garrett, there wasn't anyone else he had worked with, that I can recall. It would've been interesting if Mart Hulswit had still been in the role of Ed, how much more they might've let Ed/Roger clash. I really do have a soft spot in my heart for Krista's Mindy.
    • San Bernardino Sun, 21 July 1981 Soap gets a new lease on life By TOM JORY Associated Press NEW YORK (AP) NBC's Texas premiered Aug. 4, 1980, in the toughest time slot in daytime TV opposite top rated General Hospital on ABC and CBS' enduring -Guiding Light As recently as the first of this year, " Texas appeared doomed, a victim of barely measurable ratings. All that has changed, and the show approaches its first anniversary with a new executive producer, a new team of writers, a new look and a new slant on life. Even the ratings have improved a bit, from 14 percent to l5 percent of the audience in the time period in November and December to 15 percent to 16 percent today. "We have Houston like Ryan's Hope has New York City," says Gail Kobe who took over Texas as executive supervising producer in March,"and we feel a real tie with that city. We've got to reflect in the show what's happening in that real town, and I think we're doing that." It was a significant step, taking Texas- its roots in the fictional Bay City of NBC's Another World -to a real-life setting. "I don't think it's got to be  the kind of place that people can't can't find on the map," says Ms. Kobe "I think the audience in daytime is more prepared for reality today." It meant giving the show a recognizable Houston backdrop, a more contemporary sound -country and western performers like Ray Price will appear periodically and a lighting system that would clearly represent the hot, bright Texas sunlight. . Texas faced difficult odds from the start, the competition and the inevitable comparison with CBS' prime-time superhit, Dallas, notwithstanding. There was the problem of introducing a multiplicity of characters, many of them imports from Another World, as well as a story line, in an hour-long format. "It was the first show to start at an hour," says Kobe, a former actress who had been supervising producer for Procter & Gamble Productions, which owns Texas and five other daytime shows. "It's very difficult to fill that much time with a large cast, and not leave the viewer confused. "With a daily show, you have to let the audience know who to root for," she says. ''And if you're trying to begin a story, too, no one's going to keep track." The changes began even before Kobe took the show from Paul Rauch, who had faced the seemingly impossible task of producing both Texas and Another World simultaneously. Beverlee McKinsey, whose generally unpleasant character, Iris, had come to Texas from Another World as a young ingenue, was given back her mean streak.  "She had become a sweet woman,"Kobe says, "and the audience was used to seeing her do terrible things. It just didn't work." In addition, she says, time was spent establishing the identities of the characters. Joyce and Bill Corrington, who had created the show with Rauch, were replaced as head writers in February by Dorothy Purser and Samuel Ratcliffe.  
    • 1995 CBS was sold to Westinghouse and Les Moonves arrived at CBS. I pointed out 1995/96 Murder, She Wrote as sabotage in the Tank Jobs and Sabotage thread.  
    • I think Flannery did some great work, but I always found Stephanie's underlying hypocrisy off-putting. And while I don't think KKL's the world's best actress (I completely understood why she's received so little attention from the academy for her work), I do think that her appeal as Brooke was responsible for a lot of B&B's success.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy