Jump to content

DramatistDreamer

Members
  • Posts

    18,588
  • Joined

Posts posted by DramatistDreamer

  1. You know what? I think I clicked on just after that on court coaching incident that you just described @ChitHappens because I heard vague conversation about on court coaching, etc. but the volume was turned down so low that I guess I didn't really pick up the details, but I found it interesting that the commentator was talking about OCC even though play had already resumed in the match.

    Hmm.

    Instead, I heard some tennis journos b*tching about Wang not officially qualifying for Zhuhai, yet getting into the tournament as an alternate LL type, etc.

    I just kinda laughed and shrugged it off because I was kind of low-key gleeful that Muguruza got bageled.

  2. 2 minutes ago, ChitHappens said:

     

    Are you talking about the match against Wang?  2 consecutive matches with her bad behavior.  I guess it's not all Sam, huh?

     

    I saw very little of the semifinal.  You mean there was another incident??!  I haven't heard of anything today. What happened?

    Just now, Soapsuds said:

    I never thought it was Sam. I knew she was trouble when she got rid of Conchita Martinez probably her best coach ever and who helped improve her game and won a major. I just raised my hands and thought this bitch is stupid...LOL

     

    Muguruza seems to be a very domineering personality and when anyone tries to even the power dynamic with her, she pitches a fit.  She should try to go coachless for awhile.  If she keeps this up, she may have little choice.

  3. 19 minutes ago, Soapsuds said:

    I caught the first set and it was tight but wasn't able to see the second set. I am just glad Thiem did well and got to the semis and took out horrible Trumpster Jack Sock and his groupies....Mike Bryan and John Isner. John Isner screaming and yelling and standing up after Jack won a point was so annoying to watch. Thank goodness Thiem shut him down and now Jack ranks #105....LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

     

    I think Khachanov has a chance to win it all. I haven't been impressed with Roger or Joker during this tournament run. 

     

     

    That was horrible. I use to be a Mugu fan but I am quickly disliking her a lot.

     

    I've been lukewarm on Garbiñe for quite some time now but I was most annoyed at how muted the criticism has been toward her tantrums. 

    Even though I hate on court coaching (and not-so-secretly hope this incident plays against it), Muguruza handled herself terribly in that situation.  She and Sumyk seem to have this weird, almost unseemly co-dependent relationship.  It seems to cross over the line of a player chirping at her coach.  

  4. A lot of people were grateful to Thiem for taking out Jack.  Last year when Sock won, I didn't really care one way or the other but he shouldn't be able to flop his way to the SFs when he did bupkis in singles this year.

     

    It's cool to see Khachanov emerge, and it would be equally cool to see him emerge with the trophy tomorrow. 

  5. None of the people who run the major Hollywood studios can be called liberal by any stretch of the imagination. 

    Having some vocal actors and a few directors and some writers, who also happen to be liberal doesn't constitute an entire industry being that way. The people with actual power to greenlight a movie or a series are almost always conservative and it has been this way going back to the days of MGM and Louis B. Mayer.

     

    Many people look at actors and think that they run the industry.  They don't.

     

    We've actually discussed this topic in the Movies and Music Thread and lately, also in the Hollywood Sexual Assault/Sexual Harassment thread in the Off-Topic Section.

     

     

     

    Despite, the ruling in Georgia, I see the voter suppression handbook is still at work in some states.

     

  6. I'm glad you posted this @Khan so I didn't have to.  :)

     

    The actual document, which is stored in 'the cloud' is available with a quick online search.  With each L that Trump Inc. takes, it draws even sharper focus on his haste to try to reshape the courts.

  7. 1 hour ago, Juliajms said:

    I do.  It's the televangelist kind.  Where the guy on TV is getting grannies and rubes to send him their social security checks, while he buys private planes and hookers.

     

    I've forgotten that this type of style has now permeated the pulpit.  I never expected a twenty-something year old man would be taken in by the kind of philosophy that Jimmy Swaggart promoted.

     

     

    Why so expensive? Did the side-piece go on the trip too?

     

    This sounds like some much needed good news.

     

  8. 19 minutes ago, Khan said:

    From the article:

     

    No one cared about us until Trump.

     

    That's just it; they DID care and they still do care.  (Certainly, they care(d) more than Trump ever will.)  But the problem was that the solutions they were offering, you didn't want to hear.  You wanted to hear exactly what Trump told you: "the world is just fine, nothing is changing, just keep making your popcorn and we'll take care of the rest."  It's the equivalent of daddy coming into your bedroom after you've had a nightmare and telling you there are no monsters hiding under your bed or in your closet.  However, in this case, the monsters are very much real, and they are no longer hiding.

     

    Thanks, DD, for the article!  :)

     

    Yeah, there were a few lines that I read from a few of the people that cause me to roll my eyes.   Also, the guy that said that he was conflicted because although he disagreed with Trump's stance on immigration, he believes Trump is a man of God :wacko::huh::rolleyes:.  I couldn't help but think that this guy really needed to get out of his bubble.  Trump may be a lot of things but a devout Christian is NOT one of them.  I was raised in church, have relatives who have done missionary work and I don't recognize Trump's brand of Christianity.

     

  9. It's been about eight years since I've watched an entire episode of anything on cable news but all I have to say is, never underestimate the calculus that goes into having an intelligent, engaging host who doesn't pander to the soundbyte.

     

    I have to put in a mention to the highly under-rated PBS Newshour that has been doing longform broadcast journalism for decades.  I've watched them since I was a tweenager (Charlayne Hunter-Gault initially reeled me in).  These days I admit, I don't watch as faithfully (I don't watch as much TV period) and that Brooks and Shields segment has to be the weakest part of their broadcast (thankfully, it's usually only once a week).

     

    I wasn't going to read this NYT article but I saw the first picture and excerpt and, it's not as bad as I thought it would be and it turned out to be a somewhat interesting read, particularly the young woman who states her feeling that the evangelicals have done immense harm to marginalized communities.  There are some real conflicts going on within the evangelical community and just as I have suspected, it goes along demographics like age and ethnicity/race primarily.  

     

    ‘God Is Going to Have to Forgive Me’: Young Evangelicals Speak Out

  10. OMG. I have been seeing this story on the news and I had no idea the sisters were Saudi.  The thread is quite chilling.

     

  11. The thread about Wohl approaching those financial firm for seed money and a bunch of perks was pretty funny too.

     

    Case in point for Trump being some sort of odd Pied Piper for the corrupt and/or criminally-minded:

     

    OMG people should read Jane Mayer's Twitter feed about Wohl!  It's quite something. They actually used a picture of Christoph Waltz, lol!

     

  12. It's not that I expected the challenge to birthright citizenship to succeed but I did expect him/them to try it.  

     

    What I'm marveling at is the sheer frequency of these criminal operations.  It's as if Trump were the "Pied Piper" of underhanded/criminal operations to subvert the government.  They all are flocking his administration.

     

    Also, I'm bracing for those tax cuts to bite the economy.  Trump is only good at making money for himself by gaming the system and short-changing people.  He's no good at creating equity for others.

  13. 7 minutes ago, Juliajms said:

    Yes. I see people saying that white liberals are the only ones surprised by this, but I don't believe it.  I do think that other people have wrapped their heads around it faster because they've been here before in a sense. I find I just can't adjust to were we are.  It feels deeply unreal to me.  That so many people have fallen for it is incredible to me.

     

    Mostly, I expected things like the challenge to birthright citizenship and harassment of ethnic minorities, racist incidents, etc., programs cut that help marginalized and low-income communities to happen but these bizarre events, like the one unfolding today is something that I still marvel at. 

     

    This operation by Surefire Intelligence just feels like something lifted from the idea for a disregarded Kafka novel, or an idea that Ray Bradbury might have thrown away as being too preposterous to get published.

    And I didn't even post the story published by The Daily Beast.

  14. Absolutely wild.  All these GOP operatives who are trying to frame Mueller while simultaneously seeking to diminish the #MeToo movement.  The women were the ones who were approached by this man and they reported this.  So yes, do believe the women because they refused to perpetrate a fraud.

     

  15. I didn't know who this Jacob Wohl person was until today but it seems like he's in for a spot of trouble with the FBI.

     

  16. Bizarre, surreal and incredibly messy 'Merica.

     

  17. 8 minutes ago, Khan said:

    Did I miss something (again)?  Who is "they," and what did they attempt to do to my baby daddy, Robert Mueller?

     

    This thread moves at a furious pace these days but I posted this tweet this morning.  I can't see the original tweet but if you click the link, it'll probably take you to the original post where the reporter's tweet is embedded. 

     

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy