Members DramatistDreamer Posted March 15, 2017 Members Share Posted March 15, 2017 Yeah, no Geraldo's Al Capone vaults mess, please. I don't have MSNBC, so I guess I'll have to keep an ear open to social media for the responses. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Roman Posted March 15, 2017 Members Share Posted March 15, 2017 you know how it takes her 40 minutes to get to the damn point.... she says she has his returns......from 2005. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DramatistDreamer Posted March 15, 2017 Members Share Posted March 15, 2017 Only one year?! Sadly, that's already more information than previously known. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members marceline Posted March 15, 2017 Members Share Posted March 15, 2017 (edited) That's better than the previous returns we got from Martha Maples. Edited March 15, 2017 by marceline 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Vee Posted March 15, 2017 Members Share Posted March 15, 2017 (edited) I like Rachel, but this is definitely not the night for her increasingly tiresome and mannered long wind-up act where she grins a lot and repeats herself about a dozen times. She'll need to get right to it. Edited March 15, 2017 by Vee 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DramatistDreamer Posted March 15, 2017 Members Share Posted March 15, 2017 More Goldman Sachs people for Trump, yet Hillary's speaking engagements were a huge deal somehow. Trump must've been jealous that she was getting paid for speeches and he has to run chasing these people. The people who voted for him to "drain the swamp" should really be embarrassed right now. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members marceline Posted March 15, 2017 Members Share Posted March 15, 2017 Agreed. I hope she'll get right to the important stuff. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Vee Posted March 15, 2017 Members Share Posted March 15, 2017 If it is the 2005 returns - which the WH is claiming it is while decrying Maddow - then it better have Russian evidence in it or she's poisoned the well. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Roman Posted March 15, 2017 Members Share Posted March 15, 2017 this is one of the reasons why I stopped watching her show. this spiel she goes on every single night is just boring. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members rhinohide Posted March 15, 2017 Members Share Posted March 15, 2017 https://www.forbes.com/sites/stuartanderson/2017/03/11/83-of-americas-top-high-school-science-students-are-the-children-of-immigrants/#d65cc0a2200f 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Roman Posted March 15, 2017 Members Share Posted March 15, 2017 20 minutes going over the same stuff she has reported on for months.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DramatistDreamer Posted March 15, 2017 Members Share Posted March 15, 2017 I've just read that the tax return doesn't detail anything about where the money came from. That's really important! If it doesn't detail where the money came from or how it was made, what's the point? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Roman Posted March 15, 2017 Members Share Posted March 15, 2017 starting to really look like she screwed the pooch on this one.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DramatistDreamer Posted March 15, 2017 Members Share Posted March 15, 2017 Fair enough. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Vee Posted March 15, 2017 Members Share Posted March 15, 2017 (edited) I like Rachel Maddow a lot, but this is the kind of smug woolgathering monologuing she does a lot which goes nowhere and it's a big part of why we lose IMO. If she was going to go on national TV and hit #1 on Twitter she needed to come with something real and not her usual giddy nerd act and a lot of smoke. This makes any media inquiry into Trump and his taxes a little weaker, but at least it keeps the conversation at the forefront. I am so angry at her thinking she could come out and do her usual wonk schtick. Edited March 15, 2017 by Vee 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.