Jump to content

DAYS/Y&R: Casting Shocker!!


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 140
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

(credit to @dragonflies for finding the tweet)

Here is why the rumor is back...
From a group of French Y&R viewers, (Y&R is called "Les Feux de l'Amour" in France), they are active on social media.

May 21, 2025, they said on their twitter and facebook pages that there is a *RUMOR* that Aristotle Dumas is a pseudonym for Cane Ashby, and thus Billy Flynn is playing Dumas who is actually Cane.

Now on May 28, they tweeted this screenshot from the IG stories of Y&R costume designer Mandi Lane.
Wardrobe hanger labeled with a character name starts with "CA".
Behind that CA wardrobe hanger, you can see one for "Abby".



https://x.com/LFDLAYR/status/1927771297599094958




https://x.com/LFDLAYR/status/192784866143150121

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My thoughts/speculations/wonderings...

Billy Flynn isn't Australian, so how could he be playing Cane?
(yes I know JoshGriffith rarely make sense).

I know nothing.  But I'm not convinced that Dumas is actually Cane.  It's theoretically possible that Cane is working with Dumas, or working against Dumas.  *Maybe* they're the same person? But it just doesn't make sense to me.  I just don't know if Cane and Dumas are two different characters who will both debut at the same time with two different actors playing recast Cane and new character Dumas? Or if they are the same person played by one actor.

It does seem plausible that Cane would be written as plotting about Chancellor and about Winters, since Cane pretended to be Jill's son and because Lily divorced his lying a.ss.

But I don't believe Victor Newman would be ranting about Dumas if Dumas is Cane. Why would Victor care about Cane?  I mean, Nikki is running Chancellor and Victor would want that protected, but wouldn't Victor view Cane as being unworthy of notice?

Billy Flynn was filming Days into part of April.
The Y&R episodes that aired recently were filmed around April 8th, based on behind-the-scenes pics.  So that would fit for Flynn to first appear on Y&R onscreen at end of May or in early June.  (whoever his Y&R character is)

The original Billy Flynn casting announcement says
"he will debut later this spring in a newly created role."
https://www.soapoperadigest.com/content/casting-shock-days-star-billy-flynn-heads-to-young-and-restless/

A newly created role.  That doesn't say recast.  Unless that's subterfuge.

 

(I just edited this post a bunch of times, thinking aloud, trying to make it make sense, LOL.   I'm sure I'll be proven wrong about all my speculations, but whatever)
I just don't want smarmy Cane back.

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I posted this on the Mishael Morgan thread ("Y&R: Former actor returning for guest stint").

I'll add it here, too, since it relates to Billy Flynn and Aristotle Dumas:

Mishael Morgan interview with Jeevan Brar of Canadian site "thetvwatercooler.com".
Uploaded May 20, 2025.  She said she went home to Toronto for the Victoria Day Canadian holiday long weekend, but was back in L.A., implying that she was still taping Y&R.

When asked if she has taped with Billy Flynn, she said yes but gave no details.

At the end of the interview she says there is a party coming up for the Dumas reveal, they built a whole new set for it, it's going to be fun and very beautiful.

Please register in order to view this content

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

lmao, if he is Cane I called it. It's because of Beyond the Gates - all these shows are trying to quickly write "black storylines" and line up black characters and Y&R wants to put Lily right up front and centere, and all they could think about to do so was bring back Cane. A Mess. 

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sadly, the only thing JG knows how to do is resurrect old storylines and old characters.

This is *not* good for the character of Lily at all.  If she defeats Cane in business, fine, if he runs away.  But if they fall in love? ewwww.  

I like Billy Flynn, but I'm not going to give the horrible character Cane a pass.  Nope.
 

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Cane is no better or worse than anyone on the canvas, curranty. I don't understand why peeps hate him so much, regardless of Goddard playing him. For me personally as long as it's not Goddard (w/ his creepy bts antics) I don't care. He's basically a brand new character to me. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If that is the case, it's a very self-destructive way to go about it, as I am not sure how many black viewers are going to give a damn about her being used to propel Cane storyline. I'm not sure Lily has any real importance to potential new or lapsed viewers anyway.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They've got all these BIPOC characters appearing regularly: Lily, Nate, Damian, Holden, and Audra; with somewhat less regular appearances by Devon, Amanda, and Amy.
This was already an improvement.  I thought some of this was in response to BeyondTheGates.

I don't see how bringing in Cane-as-Dumas helps Lily in any way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Cane is simply not a strong enough character to recast. If it was DG, at least you'd be able to reintroduce the character with years of clips. Unlike, say, when Phyllis was recast, you had a strong, memorable character with ties up and down the canvas. 

I hope BF is someone else - though the character would need strong GC ties. I only three meaningful routes: a sibling/child - tied to Diane, Lauren/Michael or Devon (via Tucker).

If Tucker had an unmentioned son, it would make sense that he'd want to protect Winters and try to get Chancellor back. And also explain the secrecy. 

The Fosters/Prentiss families have long been forgotten so that would not only create an island, but also not be relevant to most of the existing audience.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • GH was good? I havent watched since Joss went away to do her traininig and Lulu had just called Brooklyn out for having Dante's baby and not telling him
    • BTG: A-  DAYS: B+  Eastenders: C
    • There was a rumor that Jean will die and that’s probably why she’s back then
    • There has been some confusion about Michael & facial burns. Please see this post: https://bsky.app/profile/shallotpeel.bsky.social/post/3lqkrryu54226 I've chosen to put this here instead of the Classic Thread because it is now with the appearance of recast Michael that this has come up. Different places online, including at least one podcast, remarks have been made about how remarkable it is that he is without facial scarring. Other fans say it was clear from the first that he did not have facial burns. What is included in this post is 2 screengrabs where you can see his face at the hospital & a very quick edit of that day in the hospital. 
    • Put me in the LOVE KMH camp. As a poster alluded to above, her detractors seem to come from people who first experienced the 80s Emily actress. And that's often the case with soaps, myself included. I enjoy the original actor so much that I just never take to the recast. However, KMH played Emily far longer than the original - for almost 20 years - and when she had great material, she was great. I get the sense she didn't like playing the whiny oh-woe-is-me Emily which was all the material she got from about 1996 until she took over the Intruder in late '99/early '00 and got to play a stronger kiss-ass woman who didn't care what anyone thought of her. (Some would call that a bitch but, if a man was in that role, he'd just be called a smart and savvy businessman.) Her relationship with Hal was great. The transformation was done realistically and I thoroughly enjoyed those years the best out of all. Once the writers decided to break up those two, they went back to writing Emily half the time as whiny and pathetic. I preferred when the writers made her stronger.
    • Hahaha - I do. I've always been the type, though, that can't miss anything. I get FOMO, so I'll not skip episodes or fast forward anything. There are only a few TV shows I've dropped because they got so bad vs. sticking it out to the end.  The promise that GL 1997 is better is what keeps me going. I especially want to see the fallout of Blake's lie about her twins and then Annie's descent which I believe won Watros's Emmy.
    • Rita's rape is an episode i constantly search on YouTube hoping one day that it will show up. I always feel like I may have seen it, but I was only 6 at the time and can never figure any of the things I have vague recollection of 
    • FROM THE VAULT: NON-SOAP DAYTIME RATINGS: HIGHLIGHTS FROM FEBRUARY 1973 & MAY 1973:

      Please register in order to view this content

        FROM THE VAULT: NON-SOAP DAYTIME RATINGS: HIGHLIGHTS FROM AUGUST 1973 & NOVEMBER 1973:
    • The rape was in 1979 after they were married. Blake was the result of Holly cheating with him while she was married to Ed. I believe she was born in 1975. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy