Jump to content

ALL: Couple vs SUPER Couple?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Doug & Julie probably had more obstacles to overcome than most. If you recall, they were out of synch with each other repeatedly. He'd be free & she'd be with Bill Anderson, maybe. Then, she'd get free but by then he'd be with Addie. Their stolen moments out of the country sustained them. I believe that thing of them being unavailable to each other began because Bill Bell's plan was NOT TO EVER marry them! So, timing being this huge obstacle for them was by intent.

I get it that today all couples have obstacles. It has become an automatic trope that is always applied but it began by being applied to the supercouple formula that has been referred to & harkens back to PFS & Shari Anderson.

Edited by Contessa Donatella
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Your first line is ironic because you defined the term perfectly. Hats off to you.

In my mind a supercouple is limited to Luke & Laura and their knockoffs: Frisco & Felicia. All the main 1980s Brady couplings. Maybe Steve & Betsy on ATWT.

I think calling Jessie & Angie a supercouple is an insult to the actors & writers. The characters had inner lives and ambitions that didn't revolve around their pairing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree that supercouples were a phenomena of the 80's and tied to the action/adventure trend.

As well as the obstacles of a villianous rival  eg Larry Welch, there had to be some larger than life factor ,usually involving criminals/spies etc.

Days and GH did the most.

I think there had to be some longevity also.

I would include Travis/Liza, Steve/Betsy at some point but the Betsy recast and Doug Marland's writing for them moved them in a different direction.

Other popular couples, who faced more mundane,traditional obstacles do not earn supercouple status.

As for Bill Bell not wanting Doug and Julie married ever, I don't buy it.

I think he believed that they could have got another year or two out of the story before the wedding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Exactly - "star-crossed lovers" has long been a trope for literature, but it's not the same thing as a supercouple. In all honesty, I see so many shows still clinging onto that thing and it's just not working these days - partially because of the budget (action/adventure stories rarely work without at least some budget), but also since it seemingly makes viable characters never being able to move on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They did use the cheap version of the formula with Spencer/Esme. The whole Cassadine adventure, the prolonged period of tension between them/keeping them apart, Esme, the banter. And while I believe they improvised the run into each other’s arms, that is about as supercouple as it gets. The biggest difference was due to IMO racism and the stupid FV schedule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Here's the first one I've found today, at least.

Hayes, B., & Hayes, S. S. (2005a). Like Sands Through the Hourglass: A Story of Love. New American Library, A Division of Penguin Group. ISBN 0-451-220005-6


"Head writer Bill Bell had sworn he would never let Doug and Julie marry. But Bill was gone. CBS had offered him carte blanche to do whatever he wanted, and he went on to create and produce The Young and the Restless and then The Bold and the Beautiful, two great soaps that will remain on the air as long as daytime serials last. Bell continued to influence our lives as my mother's writing mentor, but he was no longer writing DAYS. So, in 1976, Corday gave Doug and Julie up to marriage, that state of romantic fulfillment the fans were begging to see."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It is well worth the read. Bill & Susan swap back & forth. He writes a chapter. Then, she writes one. And, so on. Also they are both excellent scribes, using a vast vocabulary, having a great sense of what their audience is interested in, using colorful & descriptive phrases.

Edited by Contessa Donatella
more
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And thank God we have people like you who remember all these details and bits... and can quote them perfectly with sources. I would never have remembered such a thing with my ADHD. SON continues to be the place where I find the most accurate info. 

Please register in order to view this content

Thank you! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I feel like the show has been like this for the past 15 or more years, IMO. Things happen but there are never or RARELY any long-term impacts. Instead, everything (characters, history) is just reset to what it was before. In a couple of months, Hope will be working at Forrester again. No one will ever mention the takeover. Brooke and Ridge will be back together for the millionth time, etc etc.  It's hard to get invested in a story when you know this is how the show works.
    • Martin and Smitty's kids not being there seemed like a glaring omission. Also, Naomi and Jacob weren't there as well. I know some of this is probably budget, but it seems like there could be a way to still have them all there.
    • Thanks so much for finding this & posting it. This makes me so angry!!!
    • Dani had a flashback of Dani getting ready for an event with Bill. The gown she wore in the flashback was light green and elegant and gorgeous. The light green flashback dress was quite different than the red/orange/lilac swirling print beaded gown that Dani is wearing to Nicole's anniversary party.   But there was clearly the show's intention to have the Dupree women (except for Nicole) wearing shades of red.   I love Anita but the red gown that she's wearing to the anniversary party -- not flattering.
    • I think you can find them here https://www.tumblr.com/tagged/OLTL What's there is recaps from SOD at the times it shows which is usually from way back up till 2003. Most if not all of this is due to Matt Smith who you may recall from his AW playlists on YoutTube. 
    • Party wardrobe color theme: Good Queen Nicole is in a solid gold gown. The other Dupree women (plus Smitty) are wearing shades of red/pink (with purple accents) -- Anita, Dani, Chelsea, Kat, in dresses. -- Smitty in white shirt and maroon jacket. (did not see Naomi?) "The help" Eva and Mona are in black. Antagonist queen Leslie/Dana in a black/gold gown. The men (except for Smitty) are wearing black. Ted - white shirt, black tie, black jacket. (Ted's jacket was shiny with back polka dots on black background) Vernon - black turtleneck, white dress shirt over it, black jacket (no tie). Andre - black T-shirt, gold chain, black jacket. Martin - black shirt, black tie, black jacket. Dr. Carlton Fitzgerald - white shirt, black tie, black jacket. (did not see Jacob?) I didn't see Naomi and Jacob at the party, but perhaps they arrive later? The evening is not over yet.
    • Tate seems to love throwing punches now

      Please register in order to view this content

      I enjoyed his scenes with Johnny. Both of their perspectives make perfect sense to me and are completely relatable. There’s no right or wrong person in this situation and I like that. LH  does pretty well when Tate is angry too, but I also liked the way that he comforted Johnny in the end. Days is finally remembering that they’re cousins. And, Johnny looked hot in the beginning   Btw, Johnny going to work for Xander? That could be interesting. And, also can cause some more animosity between him and EJ.  And again, Marlena/Belle were great. Scenes like theirs really seem to be commonplace under Paula/Jeanne and I couldn’t be happier that they are. It’s helps us get a much better understanding of these characters and why they do the things that they do and feel the way that they feel. Marlena supporting Belle was a bit of surprise, considering her insane reaction when she walked in on EJ and Belle, but I also feel that it’s totally in character for her, both as a psychiatrist and as Belle’s mother.  As for Sophia and Amy… I miss the first Sophia lol but I can’t help but think that Amy suddenly being so nice is foreshadowing of something. Either that, or Paula/Jeanne aren’t biased against her
    • @alwaysAMC Great mini-review as always.  That Gilly story is...certainly one I could not forget... I imagine a number of viewers were shocked with the temporary recast. It was revealed in the soap magazines, as was the news about Frank Beaty's breakdown, I think. I think Wolf had some statements or an interview at the time but very little. I wish someone could interview him. He did a good job under extremely tough circumstances.  For some reason I have a vague memory of him in the Marian getup but that's probably not right.  I'm glad you have appreciated the material with Susan after a shaky start. I always enjoyed her, and she was the only love interest I liked Nick with. 
    • How did this come to be?

      Please register in order to view this content

      Btw, if he’s on again, you should apply to be a contestant
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy