Jump to content

DAYS: January 2025 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I agree with this.  Some of the dialogue is very foreshadowing and it feels...Idk, crass or insensitive?  Like you said this diagnosis is generally terminal and I do appreciate Days for hoping things would work out for Drake.  It's just sad Marlena and his family will be missing him for months and then John will die without saying goodbye or having a few more good moments.  I would be okay with Marlena and his family seeing him off screen.

I feel like even with Doug and Victor being in a different room or on a trip there was at least the implication they were around and having moments with their loved ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 385
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Yes Drake's actual diagnosis is almost always terminal. However, I don't know how many of the cast/crew/staff knew anything other than he had "personal time off" or something vague of that nature, or a nonspecific health situation.  The family kept things very private and did NOT want the details leaked at all. 

I think only very few of the cast/crew/staff knew the actual diagnosis.  Obviously Greg Vaughan knew, because, after Drake passed away, GV shared on his instagram texts that he had exchanged with Drake.  And after Drake passed, Christopher Sean said in an interview that Drake had told him the truth privately in a dressing room.  I think others said so too, in interviews.
I don't want to get into the details of which actors knew what and when, as those details and interviews were all already posted on the Drake thread.
As I said, many did NOT know, as the family didn't want it leaked.

My point is this:  I don't have BTS knowledge, so I don't know when the writing team and directors knew what.   Eventually they were informed, as we know that management communicated with Drake about writing in John's death.  But did Ron know?  Or was it not known until the new writing team came in? 
This I have no idea about, no idea at all.

But yeah, if Ron did know, then the writing does seem insensitive or at least awkward.

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was thinking, with the recent actor passing on GH, that the audience may get “grief fatigue”.  As much as it is instinctive to want to honor the death of a cherished actor, we went from Victor, to Doug, and next John's funeral.  Which is why I like the idea of John being permanently away on assignment. 

There must be a way to memorialize the actor, while maintaining some romance and levity within the story universe.  This much loss can be overwhelming.  And, I am concerned about how it will affect the tone of the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, the assignment/mission part doesn't bother me.  It just would be nice to know either John could get home sometimes or his family was able to visit him.  We don't have to actually see it.

That's fair and I don't think non-essential people would or should know.  I think Ron would be an essential person who would have known just to figure out the parameters and timing of Drake's absences.  But I don't have any insider info either.

 

I would have to wholeheartedly disagree.  The losses recently have been depressing.  There is just no way I would continue to watch a show that let John just linger off screen.  I hated when they did that with Stefano.

John was one of the greatest heroes on Days of our lives.  Marlena/John were a leading supercouple for years.  Just because the soap world is experiencing multiple, sad losses doesn't mean Drake/John don't deserve a tribute.

And honestly, one of their leads passed away.  The tone of the show is going to be sad unless Ron just decides to 'treat' us to 5 days a week of Leo and Body & Soul

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What I propose is a way to memorialize the actor, while maintaining the character.

Because the losses are going to keep on coming; inevitably.  The average age of the actors on DAYS keeps creeping upward.  So, who gets a special episode, and who doesn't, are the real challenges that lay ahead.  And, perhaps there are creative ways of dealing with these deaths that doesn't involve protracted stories that linger on for a year?

I know that my lack of commemorative values are unpopular, yet valid. I don't attach merit to tombstones, benches, and memorial parks, unlike many. But, it does become exhausting over time. 

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I suppose there is an argument on who gets a special episode or not in the future, but how can you not give a huge memorial to Doug, Victor, or John?  

How do you memorialize an actor that played a character for decades and continue that character's story?

The only place I agree with you on is the protracted storyline that lingers, but with the taping schedule that remains the way it is.  I wish Days could figure a way around it.

And while I get it might be exhausting to you that people die, I am pretty sure most of the audience wants to see closure for a character that lead the show for almost 40 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah.  I am not saying this was @j swift's point, but Drake dying at a time when other prominent soap actors also did was obviously something out of his control.  I can't imagine him not getting a huge tribute just because some other legendary cast members died before him and it might change the tone of the show.

The show is going to be changed without John.  There isn't a question.  Drake/John leave a huge hole on the canvas.

Outside of the audience feeling the loss there are many cast members that do as well.  Looking at how many returns there are planned it seems important for those people who truly knew him as well.

Anyway, this is a tangent from my first point and that is the fact I don't love this current John story and it's very depressing.  I don't find celebrating John's life and giving him the hero send off he deserves depressing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Given the timing, and the number of rewrites, I am wondering how Cat's tale about John saving her mother jibes with Steve's memory of the event?

We know Steve was there.  We also know that John doesn't recall the specifics because he was being mind controlled by the deck of cards.  But, wouldn't Steve have known Victor's plan to save Katherina?

Also, while I like that Stephanie told Sarah about the fake letter.  Once again, the timing is too rushed.  It feels like Stephanie and Philip went on one date and then broke up, and Stephanie and Sarah have been close friends for around two seconds (I know they all have more history, but I am commenting within the context of this story).

I hate Sarah keeping the truth from Xander.  I wish that Philip had more leverage. For example, if Kate threatened to out Kayla for giving Sarah the serum, then everyone would have a valid excuse to keep quiet.  Stephanie would want to save her mother, Sarah and Xander would want to protect Kayla.  It would all make sense.

 

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Stephanie instantly telling Sarah about the forgery is so unbelievably rushed, just like Stephanie even finding out.

Sarah hates when Xander lies so I’m wondering how long she’s going to keep this secret.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I suspect they're just not going to address the Steve part of it, or they'll throw in that he didn't actually know the purpose of the mission and had to be kept in the dark, or something that won't really make sense but they see it as tying up loose ends. This story is so overly complicated and nonsensical that I'll just be happy to be done with it, although the fact that Cat & co. are Konstantin's grandchildren remains insane and something I struggle to process.

Totally agree about the Stephanie/Philip/Sarah business. Why did Stephanie and Philip have to be rekindling their relationship in order for her to overhear what was going on? One thing I haven't enjoyed about the last few years is that they overload everything with so much plot that nothing gets space to breathe. I sort of like the idea of Sarah keeping this from Xander, but it doesn't feel super-motivated, especially with how she was crowing to Stephanie about how Xander has changed (how and when has she seen evidence of this?!). Kate doing some heavier manipulating would've done wonders here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But, that's why it stuck out today.

Marlena ran into Steve and Kayla, but rather than comparing stories about Cat. She only asked about John and talked about how she hates cooking for one.  Which is weird because (1) she doesn't have a kitchen, and (2) I thought she existed on exclusively on strawberries and cream.

Please register in order to view this content

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Lois and Gloria did the right thing I feel knowing it was Camila that raised Gio has BL feeling some jealousy No one is saying that Camila was a bad mother to Gio I believe it will be Gio saying that Camila was great to him, thanking Lois and Gloria to get BL to see truth
    • Its realistic for Dani and  true of how the character thinks and operates. We've known her long enough to by that this would be consistent with her past characterizatioin
    • Random takes: - What was even the point of that jeweler guy? Also—Dani was borderline harassing him. - I know I’m probably in the minority here, but I want Jacob and Kat to happen. I need something messy to completely dismantle the Duprees—and Katomas just isn’t cutting it.  - I officially can’t stand Jacob and his wife. Same goes for Anita and Vernon. - Hayley’s corset was just as ugly as it looked uncomfortable. - I genuinely don’t remember when or how Derek and Ashley reconciled—and I’m someone who didn’t even mind their storyline! LMAO. - Tuesday’s episode was a mess. - Dani finding out about Hayley’s pregnancy and immediately thinking, “She’s faking it”—huh?! What writer thought that was a realistic reaction? I get denial, but that leap was absurd. I agree the ‘Leslie Victorious’ moment was way OTT. But hey, at least I wasn’t yawning. The following episode, where she handed over her daughter’s last few belongings was much better. - I can’t with the constant back-and-forth between Orphey Gene’s and the Country Club. I forgot this was such a soap trope, but even back in my loyal viewer days (late ‘90s, early 2000s), it wasn’t this bad. While GH has a ton of beautiful sets, we’re stuck with the same three—and half of them are ugly. Also: it’s been way too long since we had a party, gala, or any kind of event. I know the Richardsons’ anniversary gala (back in late April) has had a big ripple effect, but I was kinda getting used to those large-scale episodes. Fingers crossed they don’t go with Guza.  
    • The horrific comments execs and writers make when they justify rape storylines or keeping rapists as love interests is just so icky. I remember Ron Carlivati's comments about the reraping of Marty storyline on OLTL. Made my skin crawl.  No matter what you think of her, Susan Lucci could have demanded front burner storylines but she never did. She was happy to be part of an ensemble. I never got that vibe from Zimmer.  For me, Reva was just not a character I cared that much about after a certain point no matter how talented Zimmer is/was. I think Zimmer had a keener eye for what made a good storyline, but she was less willing to take a backseat if it meant someone else got to shine. I'm trying to recall if she ever mentions Michelle Forbes in her book--one of the few times the viewers did not care about Reva in a storyline. My sense is if she did, it was probably some backhanded remark about how she had to show Forbes the ropes.    
    • GH was good? I havent watched since Joss went away to do her traininig and Lulu had just called Brooklyn out for having Dante's baby and not telling him
    • BTG: A-  DAYS: B+  Eastenders: C
    • There was a rumor that Jean will die and that’s probably why she’s back then
    • There has been some confusion about Michael & facial burns. Please see this post: https://bsky.app/profile/shallotpeel.bsky.social/post/3lqkrryu54226 I've chosen to put this here instead of the Classic Thread because it is now with the appearance of recast Michael that this has come up. Different places online, including at least one podcast, remarks have been made about how remarkable it is that he is without facial scarring. Other fans say it was clear from the first that he did not have facial burns. What is included in this post is 2 screengrabs where you can see his face at the hospital & a very quick edit of that day in the hospital. 
    • Put me in the LOVE KMH camp. As a poster alluded to above, her detractors seem to come from people who first experienced the 80s Emily actress. And that's often the case with soaps, myself included. I enjoy the original actor so much that I just never take to the recast. However, KMH played Emily far longer than the original - for almost 20 years - and when she had great material, she was great. I get the sense she didn't like playing the whiny oh-woe-is-me Emily which was all the material she got from about 1996 until she took over the Intruder in late '99/early '00 and got to play a stronger kiss-ass woman who didn't care what anyone thought of her. (Some would call that a bitch but, if a man was in that role, he'd just be called a smart and savvy businessman.) Her relationship with Hal was great. The transformation was done realistically and I thoroughly enjoyed those years the best out of all. Once the writers decided to break up those two, they went back to writing Emily half the time as whiny and pathetic. I preferred when the writers made her stronger.
    • Hahaha - I do. I've always been the type, though, that can't miss anything. I get FOMO, so I'll not skip episodes or fast forward anything. There are only a few TV shows I've dropped because they got so bad vs. sticking it out to the end.  The promise that GL 1997 is better is what keeps me going. I especially want to see the fallout of Blake's lie about her twins and then Annie's descent which I believe won Watros's Emmy.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy