Jump to content

Classic SOD Tumblr Goodies


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 241
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

 

I understand your point about Conboy, but not Marland. Soul Survivors was for CBS. So why would it be part of a development deal for his time on ABC's Loving? Also, there were later articles in Soap Opera Digest that talked about Soul Survivors and possible casting. I believe that SOD reported Marland wanted Jane Elliot for the cast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Dec 11, 1990 - the day John Gotti was arrested

 

Guess who's back?  Patsy Pease is back.  It seems like an incredibly short maternity leave, hardly warranting all of the prior hoopla .  However, Wally Kurth's departure is totally overshadowed by the news.

 

@Franko Kim Ulrich was a good idea for Sandy on Pacific Lives, but she's already attached to another soap that is never going to be produced.  The Jason Bonderoff article is like a primer for all future head writer interviews, diverse casts, multigenerational stories, urban settings, today's issues, and the drama of real life are all mentioned.  Each writer's idea is followed by a network executive saying that there is no room in the daytime schedule for new soaps.  There's no context given to the reader because some of the soaps mentioned are development deals (Conboy had deals with New World and ABC) and some are just proposals.  Also, given the changes in daytime executives at all of the networks, how many of these deals were done by previous regimes?  NBC's response would seem to suggest that Corday's deal for Pacific Lives was not a priority for the newly promoted head of daytime.  I wonder how many of these ideas got recycled once these headwriters got other gigs in the 90's?  

 

Kelly Ripa is announced at AMC.  Finally, a new hire that I don't have to worry if they spent their money too quickly.

 

Unlike Terrell Anthony who wrote an off-broadway, and dated Cady McClain, only to never be heard from again.  

 

Days gets a Thumbs Up for killing Patch because they had "no choice" given that Stephen Nichols was "never going to return" (except those three times when he returned later).  Also, disproving the notion of psychics, Steve flashed to the future before his death and saw his baby daughter Stephanie at 16, but she wasn't a race car driver sitting on the lap of her Uncle Max so it must have just been a dream.

 

 I warned Edie Lehrman three months ago about speaking against GH to SOD and now she's been fired.

 

Two issues in a row tease the re-cast of Rick Bauer, I wonder how that is going to turn out?  Will SOD admit they were wrong or never mention it again?  Also, they hired Matt Wiess on GL the most coveted role on the Upper West Side, I wonder how that is going to turn out?

 

Finally, my guess for the Late Breaking News blind item casting news from an NYC soap about a 17-year-old southern spitfire and her aging puritanical mom was going to be Dinah (GL), but I am four years too late.   Could it be Parker Posey as Tess Shelby (ATWT)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I found the article about primetime shows becoming more serialized and refusing the soap term interesting (especially the little bit with the cast of thirtysomething--I love thirtysomething but talk about being defensive.  I don't even understand Ken Olin's comment, and Patricia Wettig's opinion that soaps have lesser writing and all melodrama is a bit ironic considering the TV movies and series like Alias and Prison Break that she went on to do.)  I did appreciate the different terms though--they seem to think OLTL is more an "arc" show than a soap... hrmm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ai yi, what a day I had yesterday. Still playing catchup. I was glad to see my prediction came true and Another World* got the primer. I predict the next one will be All My Children (in keeping with the pattern; they're not going to want to do General Hospital just yet).

*P.S. I'm onto you, SOD. Having a prominent photo of Cass and Kathleen and then running a blind item about her return.

 

@EricMontreal22 That article about nighttime shows that won't call themselves soaps stands out even more nearly 30 years later. So many dramas today still fall under that distinction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have multiple issues with the primetime story. 

 

First, rhetorically, soaps are defined by more than continuing storylines.  If this were true than comic books and sci-fi stories would also be considered soaps.   Using SOD's definition of endless stories would preclude EON from being considered a soap.

 

Second, contextually, thirtysomething was scheduled on ABC in the former Dynasty timeslot.  Dynasty failed the prior season and a new scheduling exec was put into place at the network.  So, from a marketing perspective, they were never going to call it a soap.

 

Third, who cares?  Are the readers of SOD being dissed because networks didn't use the word soaps in their publicity materials?  There is no argument for why the term matters in 1990 primetime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, I'd say it's even more true now--particularly because it seems like 70% of scripted programming (comedies and dramas) are serialized now, whereas in 1990 it was still something of a new thing.  (Although on the other hand I think it's become a bit less of a stigma to at least claim that a lot of serialized TV tropes come from soap operas).

 

Yeah, that kinda confused me--especially the argument about endless stories (with them claiming OLTL in the Rauch era didn't have these).  I think most soaps have a mix of what they call endless stories and arc stories.  But I guess soap opera is something that everyone has trouble defining, at least I come across diff definitions all the time.  It seems like that attributed saying about pornography--you know it when you see it.  I mean Dark Shadows is a soap--though if you described most of its storylines to someone they would never think it was.  Primetime soaps often IMHO don't truly fit in with how I define daytime soaps, etc, etc.  Victorian sensation serials read exactly like soaps (told in installments, cliffhangers, illegitimacy, doppelgangers, stories built on coincidence, tone switching wildly from melodrama to social comedy, back from the dead stories, etc) but even when adapted into a TV serial they're still never called soaps.

 

 

Yeah, even then they were very keen to market it as a sort of prestige show.

 

 

I think it's just a resentment that they see things soaps always did finally being picked up and used on primetime tv shows without acknowledging that soaps did them first.  I kinda get that.  But ultimately I agree that it doesn't matter.  (It is interesting when I lived in England how there of course shows like Coronation Street and EastEnders are called soaps, but there is far less distinction between them and other primetime serials when you discuss them with the public.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

@j swift I finally have time to comment! BTW, I'm loving your juxtaposing the SOD issue with what was going on in the world.

 

Man, dueling cast exoduses. There's Days, where Billy Hufsey's out at the end of the year, with Judi Evans and Wally Kurth departing in early February. Then there's the Michaels, O'Leary of GL and Knight of AMC. Or the Wilsons, Alexandra of AW and Sheree J. of Dallas. Plus Edie Lehmann, out at GH. And Robert Gentry, leaving Generations, while Larkin Malloy throws it out there: Travis needs to be a leading man again. Meanwhile, Gordon Thompson assures us he's happy to take on the role of Mason Capwell.

 

Then there's the new (or returning) folks, like Kathleen and Jenna (AW), Hayley (AMC), Keith (SB) and Matt Weiss (GL). Alas, Hayley was the only one who went the distance. The "no ethnic limitations" blind item makes me wonder if OLTL was already planning for Blair.

 

James Kiberd on a West Coast soap? I'm sure Bill Eckert was always planned with Geary in mind, but now I'm picturing Kiberd's take. Speaking of GH, they are REALLY trying to tease the idea of an Edge and Anna coupling. I swear it's been mentioned once for the last three issues.

 

Oh, hey, the first SOD mention of Soapdish. I'll be curious to see if there'll be a review or commentary when it comes out.

 

Like I said, I was right that an NBC soap got the primer. My predictions for the rest of the series, in this order: AMC, Y&R, SB, GH, B&B, Loving. Also, d'oh to totally confusing Kathleen McKinnon with Frankie Frame.

 

And now, onto that new soaps article. I wish there had been more in terms of character descriptions. It was nice to know that Claire Labine was already working on Heart & Soul (not named in the article) as early as 1990. I wonder if Marland was thinking of Chicago-set Generations as he described The Soul Survivors. After all, it's not reinventing the wheel if the current tire is deflated. As for Pacific Lives ... what, no mention of Mike and little Jeremy relocating, too?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

BTW speaking of the gender pay gap, Robert Gentry was guaranteed two primetime movies in his contract to join the lowest rated soap on NBC, I don't think either member of the Haus of Evans (Judi & Mary Beth, who brought DAYS ratings up), were offered similar perks when they hopped soaps.

 

Also, in relation to today's news being discussed on other sections of this board, if a fan reporting to have "inside information" suggests that a network executive can tell an independent studio who to hire/fire as a producer then I would advise that they read up on the drama between New World, the Dobsons, and NBC Daytime in 1990.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think the arrival of the Spauldings (Alan/Elizabeth/Phillip) caused the erosion of Sara's character on the show since Elizabeth took over Sara's place in the whole Justin/Jackie story.  Sara's brief marriage to another deceptive man sounded like it paled in comparison to the previous deceptive man story that she had played the decade beforehand.. and it was probably done because of the whole Alan/Jackie/Mike/Elizabeth cluster that took off story wise.   I know the show had introduced Brandy, the woman Justin cheated on Jackie with... but I don't believe she lasted more than a year.. and didn't make much of an impression. While the Dobson's were good at writing/juggling multiple characters/stories.. they weren't perfect though they did manage to make use of characters not in the front burner like Sara, Ann, etc. I do know that Sara/Adam looked to be starting up at the end of the Dobson era with a jealous/regretful Barbara looking on.. which played out during the Roger/Holly rape story and Hollys prison story.   I don't know if Marland was as inspired by that story when he took over
    • If you ever make it to the Paley Center in NYC (fka Museum of TV and Radio), in their viewing room, you can watch Days 1/1/73 featuring Denise Alexander as Susan. It’s her last month on the show before switching to GH.
    • Overall I was impressed with this week and fall out from the revealation.  I am looking forward to seeing the Nicole/Dana showdown next week.  I do wonder if June is going to be tied to Hayley.  
    • I thought Adam and Sara got married? Although I do not remember any mention of her when Adam returned for Blake's weddings. But MA certainly got the short end of the stick storywise, as Marland's obsession with therapy reared it's head. 
    • Didn’t Meg Bennett return to SFT as a writer in the last few years. I always wondered if they tried to get her back as Liza.
    • Millette Alexander got the short end of the stick once they killed off Joe. The Justin thing was a non-starter. Then she was briefly married to Alan's corrupt lawyer and HE was killed off. She was paired briefly with Adam and that ended because she believed Holly over Roger about the rape. Definitely, Marland had zero interest in her except as the therapist for the many, many of his female characters who needed therapy. It's not odd she left the show. One of the rare 1978 episodes on YT shows Alan going to Cedars for a physical check-up. He ends up with Sarah as his doctor. In between making mysoginistic comments about women doctors, he also openly flirts with her. It's very obvious they were chem testing Sarah and Alan. It's a really good scene. Bernau is both obnoxious and charming and Millette is amazing, trying to be pleasant and profesional without rolling her eyes at him, but at the same time maybe a LITTLE bit attracted to him. An interesting what-might-have-been. So it appears the Dobsons were actively looking for someone to pair her with, they just never found the right one for a long-term story.
    • I'm happy to read whatever you provide, @Paul Raven. 

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • First, let me say I love reading all of your takes and thoughts. They always provide a different point of view... a breath of fresh air... in this sometimes stuffy topic. 

      Please register in order to view this content

      You've inspired me to add my 2 cents about this product placement debacle.  I absolutely HATE the way they are doing product placement in BTG. I really hope this doesn't catch on or evolve into more and more of these moments. It's incredibly off-putting to place them in a highly dramatic moment where we are still on the emotional journey with the character. What is next - Dani spraying the house while having a nervous breakdown? It makes me not want to buy the product they're selling. LOL. That's just me.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy