Jump to content

'Unfair' Emmy Submission Practices


YRBB

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

It's interesting.

Agree with what he says about true detective, however I also think of it as a tv show before anything else. So why not go for best drama if it is in fact one of the best? I wonder how people would feel if there wasn't a second season coming with a new cast and story.

The comedy aspect is hard. OITNB and shameless are comedies - but not sitcoms. They are very much equally funny as dramatic as they find the humor in the drama but don't downplay drama either. Very much that awful word, dramady.

It is kind of like how networks complain about hbo and now Netflix having an unfair advantage of shorter seasons, better production and bigger stars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

FX is being hypocritical criticizing HBO's decision. FX had every intention of submitting 'American Horror Story' in the regular drama series category after season 1 but when they realized that as an anthology they were eligible for the much weaker mini-series category they decided to submit it there in order to virtually guarantee Jessica Lange an Emmy win. As great an actress as Lange is, she never would've won for that role in the regular series category and FX knew it.

HBO is putting 'True Detective' in the drama series category because they believe that they can go toe to toe against the best and win and they're right. I think it's honorable for HBO to want McConaughey and 'True Detective' to have to beat Cranston and 'Breaking Bad' in order to win. FX decided to submit AHS in the mini-series category for one simple reason: they knew they couldn't compete in the drama series category, they wouldn't have even been nominated. 'True Detective' on the other hand can beat anybody. They don't have to sit at the kiddie table to get a trophy nor should they be forced to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As far as the comedy/drama aspect goes, I wish shows could be nominated in any particular category regardless of genre. If the producers thought comedy was their strong suit that year, then they submit the show for comedy. But if particular cast members thought that their dramatic performances were better than their comedy performances, then they should be allowed to submit for drama. It sucks that a lot of great comedy performances on "dramas" and dramatic performances on "comedies" were never honored in any way simply because each show, as a whole, has to pick one blanket genre. Especially when we have so many shows that blend high comedy and high drama today, they really need to look into changing those rules.

I do think it's interesting how he defines miniseries as a "show" with "groups" of episodes. A miniseries doesn't have an umbrella title or thematic connection, it's just a single story cut into episodes and that's it. Miniseries do not have "seasons." The definition was changed to suit AHS, so I don't get why he's such a stickler for vocabulary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Not to ramble too far off topic but it happens a lot with comics too, especially only wanting to keep cheap talent around and pushing out creative voices. There are some patches where creatives can go to start their own worlds...wish that was true with soaps, but who knows, maybe it can happen someday. I never thought we'd get a new soap this year.
    • Very true & also at least in the case of stand-out HWs, it is fraught with exhaustion & burnout.
    • Plus we are never going to have a Shonda Rhimes, a Dick Wolf, or a Chuck Lorre of daytime -- a single brilliant person who could come in and change the genre -- because Shonda, Dick, or Chuck would only be able to work on one soap opera at a time, not three or four at the same time as they do in primetime.  As long as TPTB insist on the 60-minute format, we will never have another super influential individual like Phillips, Nixon, or Bell.  They simply would never have time to do more than one soap opera at a time and that would stifle their influence overall. Thanks. So maybe this is happening to some degree in other entertainment genres.  I don't keep up with the particular franchises you mentioned, so I was unaware.  I appreciate your perspective.
    • I think it's become more common in other genres in recent decades, as the industry as a whole has collapsed - these are complaints that have been made about creative talents in the MCU, Star Wars, Doctor Who, etc.  The MCU is in that place now as they burnt so much goodwill that even when their new movie got strong reviews, the audience didn't show up - similar to how AW got some praise for their 89-93 material compared to some of the barren years beforehand, but viewers just weren't coming back.  (I know they did return, somewhat, in the JFP run, but not enough to make up for the big budget she used)
    • I mean I really hope so. Still kinda amazed though that it would get by Standards & Practices. A pair that was talked about that I could see it was Jacob Young & that guy who kept changing what name he went by Someone Martines at least part of the time, but at any rate Jacob was playing Lucky & this other guy was playing Nikolas.
    • Excellent explication. That doing it in these two examples, is not like doing it in other similar genres or franchises, so one could easily postulate that the people who hire do not generally consider "newbies" but instead insist upon experienced people, which leads to rehiring rather than hiring from "outside" which is what your closed system is all about.  When you think about it how many people can you name who did soaps who came from outside? I can only think of 3 HWs : Pete Lemay, Hogan Sheffer & Michael Malone. For EPs only 2: Wendy Riche & Linda Gottlieb    
    • I saw some people mentioning this and I was curious too - did Bo already know Caroline was dead? Maybe they decided it was too much for Bo to process losing Caroline along with Victor and Doug.
    • @asafi Thanks for sharing. A nice milestone. I'm not sure if she is referring to just DAYS, as otherwise she isn't alone (Ken Barlow and Rita Fairclough on Corrie are two others).

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Someone making that must have had a laugh. I have to admit I never saw any chemistry between them. 
    • That'a an interesting comparison, and might be a parallel.  But i also know too little about sports  to really comment on it's accuracy.  It might have something to do with a "closed" system, and the consuming nature of producing or writing a daytime drama and coaching.  Both in football and daytime, those factors make it hard for new talent to break into the system.  And even a very talented coach or daytime writer or executive producer can only do one team (or one show) at a time, limiting that person's impact on the entire system.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy