Jump to content

Why the soaps arent coming back


allmc2008

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I believe that if people on the message boards actually where a little bit more positive when the shows canceled instead of making threads like Worst Paring or Worst Storyline I think other production companies/networks would buy them. Granted the networks did not make it easy on us so it was in our nature to make threads like that but still. I was on the SC message boards and realized how negative people are. SoapNet was the same way! If people where positive I bet the networks would be enticed to at least put them on DVD. But like I said the networks did not make it easy on us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

TPTB couldn't give a hoot less about the positivity of message boards. An agitated fanbase is a good fanbase.

Daytime soaps as we know them no longer work economically. It's much easier for Nick/TVLand/anyotherStation to develop their own programming (be it a stale comedy or shlocky "reality" show) than for them to pay P&G/ABC/NBC to license a show and pay hundreds of employees to produce 5 shows per week. They produce; they own. They can then sell "seasons" on dvd/all the gimmicky t-shirts they want (if it happens to be considered a hit) , rerun it into the ground or bury it after two shows if it's not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have always believed that the economic part could be solved. Cut them back to 30 minutes and have a hiatus from end of December to late February. If an anniversary special lands on those months for example AMC's January 5th then have a January 5 special then continue with the Hiatus. If I had it my way I would have cut the shows back to 3 days a week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But 30 minutes/3 days a week isn't what we're used to. Would I settle for that over not having ATWT/GL? Sure. At some point in the future, a more telenovela format might succeed here in the US...but it would IMO take a huge shift in viewer habits and how ratings are determined.

Frankly, I'm not sure any kind of scripted, multi-day, new content show is viable anymore. It's hard enough for the traditional networks to make 22-25 seasonal episodics work now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • He needs to divorce her arse with her constant cheating.   She's no better than Doug... she's F*cking pathetic.
    • I didn't know of any interruptions for Maeve Kinkead after her 1997 return. Her runs would then be 1981-1987, 1989-1996, 1997-2000, short arcs until the end. I knew Maureen Garrett second run was interrupted from a 2009 interview but I couldn't recall the exact year. Her runs would then be 1976-1980, 1988-2000, short arcs until the end.
    • As I said in May, I have no problem with Martin and Bradley being married. You can still do all the fun introloper storylines with them as you do everyone else. Both men of a certain age, and it is very believable for them to have either a first love or have been previously married. And, you can do it without either of them cheating!  

      Please register in order to view this content

       I said something similar during the premiere week. Bill was the perfect age to play Martin as Vernon and Anita's child. I would've much preferred this version, but oh well.
    • I don't know how you want to count Maeve. She "retired" in '00, but would come back for appearances. I don't know however if she made an appearance in '01 or '03. In '02 I believe she came back for Josh and Reva's wedding. I assume she came back when Gina Tognoni took over the role of Dinah. And I know she was back for Ross' memorial service. Maureen Garrett was around until at least '00. I don't think Holly was in town when Ben returned though. I just got pissed off about Jerry all over again.
    • So, pretty sure Zaslow, Garrett, Kinkead, and Newman all chose to leave the first time. (If that's wrong, please correct me). Bernau - not sure why he left the first time. Was it voluntary? Or did they decide to write him out? They were writing so many out during that time period. It always seemed odd to me that they introduced Alex, FINALLY giving him someone he could talk to, and then he was written out. Or maybe that's why they made Alex his sister, so she could take his place as the head of the Spaulding family? Would love more intel on that if anyone knows. Simon - was he replaced by RVV? Or did he voluntarily leave the first time? It seems to me like one of those times TPTB decided to sex up or glamorize a character (and it clearly flopped). If he was fired, interesting he came back. Again, would love if someone could spill the tea. Clarke - I've always assumed he left because of his personal issues, but not sure if that was the case the first time.
    • So Doug just leaves Vanessa there with Joey? He's a f*cking loser. Vanessa needs to divorce his arse 
    • Tina Sloan tied Jerry VerDorn record when Guiding Light was cancelled - 26 years uninterrupted 
    • Very true...but TPTB all were desperate to get into prime time or films and couldn't, so they looked down on their own industry and tried to infuse themes that just didn't work in soaps. I would have thought after 9/11 the shows would have gone out of their way to provide that warmth and comfort that the audience wanted, and to bring old viewers back. Budget cuts? Just bring back kitchen sets, both ATWT and GL got rid of those besides one each..(the Snyders and the Bauers) You don't need super fancy sets if you have the writing. 
    • LMAO they didn't 

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • LY has a job on another show. She's going to be on the Legally Blonde prequel "Elle" 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy