June 20, 201114 yr Author Member Nah they just love tearing down characters to prop Kreizman & Swajeski's pets
June 20, 201114 yr Member They sure do like making Amanda a whore, time and time again Well... making her a rocket scientist or literary professor weren't exactly on the table, so....
June 20, 201114 yr Member They sure do like making Amanda a whore, time and time again There's nothing wrong with her being a whore. The character worked best as a skank, but a manipulative, bitchy skank. She comes across too weak and insecure rather than owning her sexuality
June 20, 201114 yr Member Nah they just love tearing down characters to prop Kreizman & Swajeski's pets She was a whore in the baby daddy story long before the Castillos There's nothing wrong with her being a whore. The character worked best as a skank, but a manipulative, bitchy skank. She comes across too weak and insecure rather than owning her sexuality There's a difference between owning it and letting it own you
June 20, 201114 yr Member She was a whore in the baby daddy story long before the Castillos There's a difference between owning it and letting it own you IA on the first part. This is NOTHING new for Amanda. She impulsively jumped to sleep with David while married to Jake and now she impulsively jumps to sleep with JR while married to Jake. And before that she slept with 3 men within a short period which led to her not knowing who her kid's father is. As for the second part, thats why I said she isnt owning it. She is portrayed as too weak for that
June 20, 201114 yr Author Member LOL she's a whore but JR isn't? She's NOT a whore she doesn't get paid to have sex with men
June 20, 201114 yr Member They sure do like making Amanda a whore, time and time again Yeah, and I thought JR still wanted Marissa.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.