Jump to content

May 2-6, 2011


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I don't want to blame fans but maybe showrunners also have let a lot of the online fan noise impact what they do. We all know how much online posters have agendas and many continue to threaten if my fave actress or this actor is horrid or don't break up my fave couple or else mentality that I think in some ways have hurt soaps too. Back years ago the showrunners ignored the complaints from fans and did what they knew was right. TOday it seems at times they let the noise drive the shows and decisions in a way versus just riding the wave and IMO that has hurt the shows as much. I think a lot of the view of soap watchers comes from what these people see online which is the farthest from the truth

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

You may be right - I do think that's true in some cases, moreso shows like Y&R or sometimes DAYS than the ABC soaps. I think at GH and AMC they always did what they wanted and if fans didn't go along, too bad. That's not necessarily wrong, but when what they wanted tended to be heinous (Rylee, endless Jason deification at the expense of everything else on the canvas), they should have checked themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

See I am not sure I agree with this. I cant speak for AMC anymore. I haven't watched AMC for years but back when I was still somewhat invested in GH to me the show seemed very static. They don't break up couples, they pander to onliners who screamed to have Becky Herbst back, they attempt to do a triangle with Sonny, Brenda , and Dante without really doing one so as not to anger Sonny and Brenda fans too much and the story was a dud, they won't break up Patrick and Robin for fear of anger, they put Jason and Sam one of the dullest couples ever on the show back together why? Not that Jason and Liz were interesting. The only thing they haven;t responded to has been less mob but the mob was a mandate from Disney as a way to streamline yet differntiate GH enough into the ABCD lineup.So I think they do cater to online screamers and thats hurt the show and prevented them from actually shaking up the canvas a bit. At the end of the day all its done is kept some fanbases on line happy and locked the show into repetitiveness and continued decreases in ratings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Supposedly putting Jason/Sam back together was about Frons. I think the most vocal fanbase was Jason/Liz, and they rarely interact.

I think keeping Robin/Patrick together is mostly down to not really caring about them. Brenda/Dante/SOnny is one of those stories that may have been impacted by bad fan reaction but mostly seemed down to someone realizing how incredibly stupid it was and how little chemistry VMG and DZ had and how it basically made Dante look like a huge a$$hole.

I think if they were interested in fan reaction they would have done another Sonny/Brenda/Jax triangle.

That's true about keeping Rebecca Herbst around, but generally I feel like GH pretends to listen to fans more than they actually do. For instance, Guza's hilarious claim that he was rebuilding the Quartermaine family - with short term Skye who barely interacted with the family, Brook Lyn who turned into a whore and ignored her family, and Maya, who was second fiddle to a 16 year old until the actress wisely found work elsewhere.

It's always tough for me to figure out how much ABC pandered to fans and how much they condescended to their idea of fans, ending up with stuff like Dixie's death, but bringing her back as a ghost 15 times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I do think she's been pretty wrecked, having tried to kill someone in cold blood, letting her whole family (including the woman pregnant with her great-grandchild) get charged or questioned, and having no remorse, but it doesn't matter as much because Kathy has not existed as a character since Gillian's return anyway.  There are reasons to bring Max back, like Lauren and his not knowing he had a child with Linda, but he is exhausted, with Jake Wood phoning it in years before he left.  I am a little surprised about Zoe because Michelle Ryan said for years she didn't want to return, to the point of even asking the show to recast the role, but I guess this may only be a short stint. I wouldn't be shocked if they kill Zoe off.
    • HAHAHA. Yeah, that's my bad. I misread that line. Sorry about going into "Unnecessary" detail about my username. Anyway, I love the story behind your Username.    reading on my phone...

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Completely agree with you. I think Bonita Brisker has been really good as Sharon. What Anita did was obviously awful, so she doesn't need to reign anything in. We're getting a good look at someone who's struggled in life compared to Anita "We're the Duprees!" Williams.   -- Anita is starting to look foolish for dredging all this up just so she  can get her ass back on stage. Is she so delusional she doesn't realize how she hurt Sharon and Tracy? -- Anita's line to Vernon "How can I expect Sharon to forgive me when I haven't forgiven myself" struck me as really selfish. After all that with Sharon, Anita again made it all about herself. -- Does anyone really believe Anita wants equal billing if the Articulettes reunite?  -- Colby Muhammad continues to be a standout. Her Kat more than holds her own with Leslie. -- The writing was very good for the father/daughter scene between Ted and Eva. It wasn't so good between Ted and Martin in their father/son scene. It didn't play like family to me, especially when Ted referred to "my wife" when talking about Nicole to Martin. -- Overall, a very solid show today.    
    • I honestly do not see the point of Max coming back again. Zoe does not surprise me. I've been waiting for that since Bionic Woman flopped in the US, frankly. I'm not against it vs. some other pointless returns. Some returns work and some don't, some are just there. Like, am I grateful that Kathy is alive? Yes, absolutely. Do I love any of her stories? No. But she's not utterly destroyed, she's just there.
    • I think Frank probably wanted to try for Jonathan with Kate Mansi. I actually can't knock the idea of a Lucky/Kristina affair or flirtation on paper, as a romantic obstacle to LNL2, but not with the characters in the places they are at present or have been over the last few years. It would be a mistake to do right now and would poison the well. I think Jonathan probably made it clear when he came back that he wanted what had been promised to him years ago with Elizabeth, and between his not being one of FV's preferred focal leads and Liz being a grudging afterthought if she's not with one of his OLTL stars, I suspect FV was content to leave them where they are vs. where they should be, which is central on the show. It's like I said a few days ago: A lot of this is how Lulu has always been. But back in the day the issue was that Lulu (and Carly) were deified for it, whereas now it's that Lulu is just used as the heavy because FV has a preexisting favoritism for Setton/BLQ. And that's a waste of a key character and talent, namely Alexa Havins.
    • Melanie Smith was very difficult to replace, but as KMH did last for a long time, she clearly managed to do so. I preferred Melanie, but the main issue with Kelley is I just think she was horribly written for most of the time. Initially the writing wasn't horrible, it's more she was not the right choice, but over time the writing genuinely became awful, and unplayable, with a few exceptions (I think her pairings with Chris and Hal worked and got to take her in some new directions).
    • Coming into June and...   TRASH. Or as I like to say for moments like this...HUNNI, WHAT IS THIS?   Outside of seeing Traci come home...and then...Ashley...not a darn thing is going on. So they are clearing stalling now, aren't they? It really hit me during the Phyllis/Daniel scenes. It was feeling like a B&B scene where two characters have the same repetitive conversation. And I have not seen Phyllis/Daniel scenes in that light lately so yeeeeah NOPE.   I did like the touch of Traci arrived outside of the Abbott mansion door and taking a breath and looking around. Very aftereffects of Martin. And I liked her and Diane having their conversation about Martin. I wished JG had allowed Traci to stay in town to deal with her feelings about Martin so at least we are getting some follow-up on that.    And same with Ashley and her talk with Jack. I will take Eileen Davidson anyway I can get her. Dare I say...will she be around for the Dumas reveal?   Outside of...   Kyle, Claire, and Harrison in a park IS NOT a storyline.   Sharon having to use the phrases (and in text) with Nick dinner as friends IS NOT a storyline.   Giggly Heffa giggly-heffa-ing around town IS NOT a storyline.    With Damian MIA and my love of Eileen Davidson...I might just go on break until the Dumas reveal if this is how we are starting June. 
    • Dragging this quote over from the Texas thread just because it shows a reference to Bay City as a fictional location at least as early as 1981. It doesn't quote Gail Kobe as saying it directly but the point she is making about the Houston setting of Texas does seem to take it for granted that Bay City is not real.
    • It's too bad they couldn't get access to the old music cues from the 80s and 90s, to run with the flashbacks or in the current scenes. That would have added a lot. Imagine if they had played the old Roman and Marlena theme.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy