Jump to content

Where Are the Darias?


Sylph

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

DARIA! <3

And I think it speaks to a fundamental problem with a lot of youth-focused programs I see lately...they all leave me ice cold. Daria was prickly, snarky, monotone, but at the same time (as they said) had heart when you least expected. Daria was pretty much everything I looked up to as "the outcast closeted nerdy teen with acne and a brain". I think Gilmore Girls combined it the best with the snarky quirky clever dialogue wrapped up in the bubbly demeanor to soften it out. 90210/Jersey Shore/The Hills or whatever is just bitchy and unbelievably vapid.

Having said this, I don't think it's a great idea to overkill the "Daria" types on TV, they won't be as memorable or as well-regarded, though I'd love more clever and less annoyinglybubblycute Jennifer Aniston types we see ad-nauseum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I liked Daria. It could be over-the-top with its stereotypes (Kevin and Brittany, the fashion club, etc), but I like how this paragraph describes it:

The "in crowd" as depicted on Daria weren't bullies or evil or anything like that. Shallow, self-centered, sure. But Daria wasn't that much of an outcast.

What made me hate MLAL with a passion was the fact that, from the jump, we were supposed to just accept popular=bad, outcast=good without ever seeing any evidence. It's the type of thing that annoys me because there wasn't this epic, stringent "caste system" in my high school. Instead of more shows/movies that perpetrate the same boring stereotypes, I'd rather see something that's able to be sympathetic to all of the different groups and cliques.

The whole "snarky teen girl" thing, though, I'm really not a fan of. It's pretty hypocritical, IMO. It's not cute, it's bitchy, and it's no different from what the "popular girls" do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

We have a deal: one would be more than enough. So I too wouldn't advocate for an army of Darias, rather for more "unique" teenage characters. The primetime TV screen is infested with insipid, lifeless teenage creations, it's difficult to feel anything for them. If you add the wrong kind of sarcasm and irony...

Gilmore Girls did try something like this out, but in my opinion Rory got trashed (too) quickly. She became needy and a snob, something I feel was a complete opposite of what this character was when we first saw her. Rory evolved, but in a wrong direction.

In a way, you are being a snarky teen girl right now. :P

It's a defence mechanism, some people deal with the superficiality that surrounds them in that way. Since no one's really trying to really change something, people are left with caustic, sneering remarks to help them "cope" with it.

I think I can "digest" teen sarcasm better than Let's save the rain forest! crap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

:lol: But that's the thing. There's a difference between having this feeling of entitlement and superiority where you automatically dismiss people you don't really know simply because you feel you "know" who they are...and owning your [!@#$%^&*].

I didn't have a defense mechanism in high school because I never felt the need to defend myself. If so-and-so wears too much make up and has sex with too many guys, I don't *need* to make a snarky side comment about it. I don't have an urge to wallow in how much cooler I am than them. If other people's superficiality affected me, then I opened my mouth and said something. But that's the thing. One of the chief components of the "snarky teen girl" archetype is that she must be secretly terrified of all that she looks down upon. That's why Daria was different, because she wasn't scared to cut a bitch if need be. Liz from MLAL had all these problems with these horrible, horrible "robot Barbie dolls," but when she was forced to work with them on things, she turned on the pretense loud and clear because she was scared shitless of calling them out for the things that annoyed her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think a lot of that was a sort of a "you can't escape becoming your parents" kind of thing, which, while I admit happens a lot, it definitely didn't do Rory any favours down the road. Especially when her life situation is so completely the opposite of her parents, which should normally keep you grounded. It just...yea. Didn't sit well with me.

I just feel bad for all the awkward teens growing up now having the only young people they see on TV being plastic, blonde & rich...or are castrated on Glee :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

OK, now I got lost: what's the thing? laugh.gif I didn't get the thing! laugh.gif

I don't think clever, sarcastic teens have a feeling of entitlement and superiority. I think their sarcasm is just a way of showing the completely unnecessary and silly entitlement of the school's "upper class", how stupid it looks from a point of view of a "normal" person, un-obsessed with social status and its symbols.

So perhaps I should correct my earlier stance and say that what I mind about it is how writers (and snarky teens in real life too) all too often get all cosy in such a position: As long as I'm critical of them and "funny" etc., I did my share of things. It rarely gets transformed into action, some sort of a creative way to "fight" it or, better, propose a new, healithier kind of "lifestyle". Instead it just hovers there, self-sufficient, uninterested in doing anything else but "commenting".

But, even as such, it's deeply necessary right now because only in that way you could uncover certain truths.

Yeah, it's awul. Especially when coupled with the depiction of sex and sexuality on today's TV shows. Sex kind of became a tool for achieving certain things, whereas previously it was depicted as something amoral or whatever, now it became "vilified" in its own way, it became something dirty and awful in a different sort of way.

I liked Daria, I really did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You know I tend to talk too much :lol: The thing is that there's a difference between A: having your own faults but being too concentrated on rolling your eyes and being snarky to work on fixing yourself, and B: fixing your own faults while also shining a light on others'. Sitting in the corner being snarky isn't going to change a damn thing if you're not gonna say it to someone's face.

But that's what I mean. Just as there is the girl who thinks she is just awesome because she's cheer captain and the homecoming queen, there is the girl who thinks she is just awesome (or "normal") because she doesn't care about being cheer captain or the homecoming queen. I say quit worrying about other people, do what you do, and let that be the end of it.

Put it like this. When the clique of pretty girls pass by the clique of outcast girls, they're all mugging at each other for the exact same reason: "I don't like them." It makes the outcast girls no better than the pretty girls because neither group is putting forth the effort to remedy the situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I'm pretty sure Lucy and Bridget never even have another scene together for the rest of the time they're both on the show. Bridget isn't even invited to the wedding! The lack of community feeling and continuity of non-romantic relationships during this period is very jarring. Characters suddenly only seem to interact with a handful of other characters, rather than characters across the canvas. I'm deep into 1997 in my watch right now and find that it's even stranger because the show goes back and forth between ignoring history in order to manufacture some kind of separation between characters (for example, at one point Amanda refers to the Coopers as a family that the Spauldings "barely know," despite her and Alan spending the better part of 1996 going to war with Buzz over 5th street, and Alan has absolutely no reaction when he finds out about something bad that's happened to Abby, which seems pretty out of character given how close they were in 95/96) and ignoring history in order to create a sense of community that doesn't quite fit (characters who couldn't stand Amanda are suddenly acting all buddy buddy with her). The wheels really feel like they're coming off in 1997 (although I know some would argue that the wheels started to come off years earlier). Watching the Marcus/Dahlia romance again from a 2025 perspective is so weird. Marcus is a full grown man who must be at least in his mid-20s and he's dating a teenager who is not only still in high school, but is still fully a year away from graduation, and no one says anything about how creepy that is. I feel like the buzz around Marcus gave the illusion that the show was more invested in him than it ever actually was. Even during his "big" story where he's arrested for Cutter's murder, he actually doesn't appear on screen very often. He's imprisoned, Griffin is brought on, other characters make a fuss about trying to get him out, but there's a long stretch of time where he doesn't appear at all. I've been keeping episode counts while I watch and between Cutter's death in mid-November of 1995 and the end of the year Marcus/Mambo only appears 7 times (and of that only twice in December).
    • The letter reading was very emotional, and Maeve really got to me too. I was a little worried because Vanessa doesn't give a speech at the funeral, which surprised me, but then we got the private letter reading and her true emotional reaction and I was satisfied there. The YouTube channel I watch these episodes on (if not on our Vault), also had upset commenters talk about how Nola's line about Henry not accepting her at first/seen as a gold-digger was totally untrue. It's sad the writers don't do their homework and give fans the respect (and the characters respect). And yep, Bill got up and spoke at the funeral too, which was nice.  I didn't even realize that was Sharon Leal until you said it!  I had to Google it. I loved Sharon Leal in Boston Public back in the day haha. LOL at your Reva/Josh ALWAYS commentary. What is RME though?
    • Leslie is an extreme liar and manipulator. I'm not sure what her point was in trying to convince Nicole she wasn't trying to hurt her. As much as Eva did help orchestrate the entire plot I feel like there was too much piling on. Eva never said she wanted to be a Dupree so Anita was extremely out of line for that comment.  
    • Thanks!

      Please register in order to view this content

       That's positive and something to look forward to for sure, because you're right, 1996 so far isn't nearly as good as 1995. Ohh - what is Lonatrat?  Sadly you're probably right. I did feel like David was rarely seen once Marcus came on. That would have been an interesting spin, having Frank and Tina be teenage lovers and Dahlia really being his daughter. I'm getting the sense that Tina won't be seen too much anymore, as she just left Dahlia with Frank/Eleni as she's heading to jail for a while. I like the Tina actress too!  Her voice sounds a bit like Rosie Perez to me, which I love. I tried to find her online, but coming up empty. This was the only thing I could find about Tina Crede - a character snapshot video with clips and stills of her (randomly starting just before the 1:00 mark):

      Please register in order to view this content

      That's wild that the David actor is nearly 40 here! Definitely surprises me.
    • 5-6   Meh. It already looks like a scattershot week.    5-5 was actually a good episode. Damian and Lily. Phyllis finally going on the warpath that I knew she could get on with Billy and Sally. Nate started to question Audra and Victor's alliance. And I was not even bugged by Kyle and Claire.   But then there's Cole's off-screen story. Kyle and Claire going back to being whiny. And them even wanting Adam's penthouse just sounded like trying to keep the set around. And Diane shouldn't even give a flying frak about Billy's opinion. And Tessa, Daniel, and the guitars...yeeeah no.   But hey...JM looked good in that short. And those pants.  I agree. One of Y&R's good points with fans has always been that you do at least see the vets. And IN stories. 
    • One of the things that I found unnecessary and a bit disturbing about Ambitions was that in almost every episode someone was holding or shooting a gun.  Jamey and Ron seem to have the same fetish.
    • I had thought that there was a Tommy Biddles on there, but then I realized I was thinking of Dr. Biddles on Santa Barbara. Never mind! 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I have watched the scene where Vanessa reads the letter and it's lovely, but I'm really glad now that I never got around to watching the funeral. Henry ADORED Nola! He treated her like a daughter and Stacy like a granddaughter. That's why Vanessa couldn't stand her. He was crazy about all the Reardons. He spent a lot of time at the boarding house. He and Bea--they never explicitly said it was romantic, but they certainly were loving friends. This sounds worse than Bert's funeral. I really did not think that was possible.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy