Jump to content

Marquee College Sporting Events Move To Cable.


bellcurve

Recommended Posts

  • Members

http://articles.latimes.com/2010/apr/23/business/la-fi-ct-turner-20100423

CBS cuts in Turner on NCAA basketball tournament

Under the new $10.8-billion deal, every tournament game will be on TV and production costs will be shared between the two broadcasters.

The great programming migration to cable continues.

Turner Broadcasting, just one week after signing former NBC late-night host Conan O'Brien, has teamed up with CBS in a 14-year, $10.8-billion deal for television and Internet rights to the immensely popular NCAA March Madness college basketball tournament.

The move comes as broadcast television struggles with rising programming costs and greater competition for viewers and advertisers. Although the NCAA tournament is a strong performer for CBS, the costs of covering the games were starting to outweigh the benefits for the network. By sharing the load with Turner, CBS can hold on to a big chunk of a marquee event with fewer financial risks.

With many of its big postseason games now headed to cable, the National Collegiate Athletic Assn. joins Major League Baseball, the National Football League and the National Basketball Assn. in going where the money is. Next year, most of the major bowl games and college football championship will be on ESPN, formerly mainstays of the networks.

Both ESPN and Fox Broadcasting made a run at the NCAA tournament, but CBS and Turner were always the front-runners. The two broadcasters had initially discussed teaming up on a bid for the event last fall and are already partners on PGA golf.

Although CBS' previous $6-billion deal ran through 2014, the NCAA had the option after this year's tournament to void it. CBS wasn't opposed to the NCAA exercising that option because, under the terms of the current contract, its rights fees were set to shoot up dramatically in future years.

The new deal "puts CBS on solid financial footing for lasting profitability," said CBS Sports President Sean McManus. If a new pact had not been struck it would have been "very challenging" for the network, he said.

Under the deal, Turner will pay the NCAA the $10.8 billion over the term of the deal and CBS will pay Turner its share. CBS also acquires some protection against potential losses. According to a Securities and Exchange Commission filing by Turner parent Time Warner Inc., any losses greater than $670 million suffered by CBS will be covered by Turner.

For the first five years of the deal, TBS will carry first- and second-round games of the tournament, then in 2016 TBS will start to alternate coverage of the Final Four weekend and championship game with CBS. Overall, Turner will have about 65% of the tournament's games on its cable channels TBS, TNT and TruTV over the life of the contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Sorry if this has been posted before or if it's old news, but this is very interesting and I'm posing some rather relevant questions:

And it sounds like if you want to watch sports in this decade, you're gonna have to get cable. What does all this mean for network television, where big ticket sporting events like the the BCS Bowl(now exclusively an ESPN event) and The Final Four(after 2016 swapping it every other year with CBS) move exclusively to cable? The only good thing about the TBS deal is that every game will be on television now instead of CBS cutting into East/West coast feeds for each other's games. All one has to do to find their school that they are rooting for in the playoffs is to look at the programming schedule instead of hoping/praying that CBS won't annoy the piss out of you by cutting into you're already-in-progress game to cover the last minute of some Ivy League school's playoff game.

It also makes me wonder whether The Super Bowl(which drew in an audience bigger than the M*A*S*H finale in February) and the NBA Finals are gonna make a move to cable this decade as well? Sporting events are huge draws for network television. Without them, the ratings across the board suck more often than not. CBS didn't fully recover from losing NFL Football until Les Moonves came in. And NBC, although they have Sunday Night Football and the Super Bowl back,(IIRC) went for one year without the NBA and the NFL. Couple that with terrible program development, and NBC's been in the toilet ever since.

I wonder if this was part of TBS' plan in wooing Conan O'Brien all along? Hoping that male sports auds will find him appealing after the playoff games air on their network as a lead-in to his show?

Will this lead to the ultimate death kneel for network, over-the-air, free television?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The most we ever saw was on the "Roger years" tape.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Right. Literally for decades, soaps mesmerized their audiences with tales of romance, family conflict, class struggles, and recognizable interpersonal-relationship sagas. We didn't need relentless, heavy violence. We didn't need clones, mad scientists, extra-terrestrials and demon possessions. We didn't need gaggles of plastic himbos and bimbos pushing beloved vets off-screen. We only needed to see people whom we cared about, and the intelligent, moving progression of their lives. Flashy sets, gaudy gimmicks, and high-falutin' hairdos be damned. The characters and the words were important.
    • Absolutely! Brad should've simply moved on from Lunacy. There's no point of freeing her, if you're not going to at least make an attempt at redemption or incorporating her into the fold. It happened with Quinn, who committed quite a few felonies before become the Forrester Matriarch.  Heck, keep Lunacy in prison and have Poppy/Finn discover that she gave birth to twins - 'Sunny' could've come on with a clean slate and still had Sheila/Finn and all the other drama. It certainly couldn't have been worse than what we've witnessed with the destruction of $B.    
    • I would enjoy it if Swan popped up on BTG as an old one time friend/mentor of Anita’s for a cameo. This is just

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I had totally forgotten that Courtney story. I see Burton was already phoning it in by that point.
    • omg I completely missed that, but now when I see it typed here in your post, it's obvious icky cringe. So now I just checked and Tomas said that -- on May 27 that he likes the author Carl Ivati.  He said it with sort of an accent, so I didn't catch the stupid joke or think about the spelling.   I remember when that aired, that I actually said to myself at the time, "I wonder if that's a Latin American author, and I will have to google him later." And now I see your post, and I see. Well that's cringe, and I feel stupid to have fallen for it.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • There's a lot you don't need if you have the writing.  You don't even need large casts!  You could make do with a cast of 12-18 actors if the writing is there.
    • Thank you. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with sleeping around if your spouse actually knows about it. She’s just a cheating slut.
    • OMG...Robert Mandan! And Donna Mills is a child. I keep hoping for more of early Ross/Vanessa.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy