Members bellcurve Posted March 29, 2010 Members Share Posted March 29, 2010 I'll attempt to be brief... For me, her agenda consists of praising people she either got along with or that she loved in her soap magazine heydey to either currently promote them(in the way R Sinclair just mentioned) or more importantly promote herself to make her arguments(on her blog and on the board here) hold more weight and validity and to create some sort of "I wish I had met them" or "Oh wow, you met ****" envy between herself and those "intelligent soap fans" she wishes to force her personal tastes, dislikes, views and beliefs. I admit, I am still bothered by the previous post and maybe you're right YurSoakingInIt, that I have no reason to bring that to another thread. Her saying that we can't judge what a Head Writer projects onto his/her shows because they write for money is completely and utter BS. She raked the story ideas of Carlivati and Guza over hot coals because of their alleged misogyny, yet some blogger in 2003 refers to McTavish and Reilly as psychos because of their own record of misogyny(among other areas of sucktitude) and that's ridiculous? Then I wish to GOD she, Sara Bibel, Tom Hackiello and every other blogger/tweeter/hasbeen would convey that experience in a way that makes some sort of interesting point about why daytime is abysmal instead of spouting off these ridiculous facts and pointless stories("Jim and Megan WAS PO' FOKES!," "Galen Gering was SO cute, I forgave him for being a douche and I still forgive him for talking [!@#$%^&*] about my dead writer friend's weight") that have absolutely nothing to do with the questions she raises or the questions that are posed to her. She wants to talk about establishing a dialogue between herself and "the intelligent soap fan"? Well my advice is to act like it and quit talking down to and playing moral police to the exact people you want to appeal to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members R Sinclair Posted March 29, 2010 Members Share Posted March 29, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members You're Soaking in it Posted March 29, 2010 Members Share Posted March 29, 2010 Ohh.... well I'm sorry, I screwed up! You see, all along, I was thinking more along the lines of this... ....and this! EDIT: Your hero is trying to rescue you again, so I'm addressing his concern. The photos aren't about frailty or femininity... they're about attitude and "fabulousness," meant as a humorous reponse directly to the photos you used in the previous post. I love this movie, and this character... Seriously? Your mind actually went there? Let's just say that no one's planning to strike anyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members bellcurve Posted March 30, 2010 Members Share Posted March 30, 2010 I'd take that back if I were you. That's not keeping the discussion "above water." And besides, R strikes me as someone who would definitely meet you outside. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members EricMontreal22 Posted March 30, 2010 Members Share Posted March 30, 2010 Aww I think Soaking's sae, it's not like he implied that R Sinclair might have actually enjoyed or anticipated a storyline written by Megan McTavish or something Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.