Jump to content

Bravo's The Real Housewives of....


Cheap21

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 40.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Cheap21

    4961

  • Taoboi

    4020

  • Cat

    4011

  • NothinButAttitude

    3972

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

The reunion was good, so I know season three is gonna be fire! Now I might be in minority, but Ana did not need to secure a spot for season the as she was one of the catalyst in drama popping off this season. And besides Melted Candle, Ana was the only new Miami housewife that is well received. I think Ana is sick of Lea's old a** picking on those who won't fight back, and let Lea know that she is her match. Plus, Ana's allegations must be true or Lea wouldn't've kept jumping up screaming like a guilty person. A hit dog will holla. . . On top of that, Lea's been taking shots at Ana's daughters on the blogs, so that harpy b*tch getting read was justified.

Adriana brought the fire too, slaying Joanna repeatedly.

So glad that Marysol stood up to Lea.

Karent will try and show up next week, but previews show that Alexia, Elsa, and Adriana serve her phony a**. And Karent REALLY needs to get off Lea's balls.

Anyone else notice the tension between Lea and Adriana AND Lisa and Ho-anna?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No offense but I beg to differ. Ana and Karent got the season popped off, but it was Joanna and Adriana's rivalry that took the cake. Plus, I personally don't need all my HWs to be turned up. Adriana filled that role, so why would Ana? And go read Lea's blog or all her interviews on the show. She was the one throwing jabs when no one was looking; however, Ana shocked her a** when she came for her. Don't go for no one kids, and no expect to read like a comic, which Ana did to Lea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think you are overselling Ana. I liked her enough but sh didnt really provide much material to work with. Her divorce and scenes with her daughters gossipping about the other women was boring. She was mainly a fly on the wall and didnt do alot of getting involved. Her contributions were very minimal. Alexa, who got a downgrade to friend, seemed more like a housewife than she was. No, not every woman needs to be turned up and dramatic. Lisa most definetly wasnt and I felt she made for a great addition as a housewife. She had an interesting and relatable personal struggle, as well as got involved in alot of the drama (without being negative and stirring ish up). Lets face it, the cast is huge. 7 women, 8 if you count Alexa. Ana is the most expendable out of that bunch. She knows it which is why she was trying so hard to secure a spot for season 3 at the reunion. It was a last ditch attempt to be relevant

In related news, Adriana is the latest housewife to turn singer

Please register in order to view this content

Edited by Cheap21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think I'm overselling Ana. I'm just stating my opinion, which is she was one of the ones in the center of the storm from the start. Just because she wasn't turned up like Joanna or Adriana does not mean she didn't bring anything to the table b/c she did. And aforementioned, her attacking Lea was justified. And she had the goods on Lea (i.e. the mysterious folder), which was why Lea was pressed. If anyone is expendable, it's Karent; however, I see Bravo keeping all these women. But if people want to believe that Ana showed out at the reunion to keep her spot, that's fine. She still brought the heat (nod to her line). Plus, the reunion was a tryout for everyone with the exception of Adriana, Joanna, and Marysol (thank Mama Elsa for that).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Neither did Lisa but she brought a heck of alot more to the table on a regular basis than Ana

Karent expendable? She was the biggest sh-t stirrer of the season and EVERYONE was talking about her. Her name was in the mouths of every single one of the housewives. Not only did she have alot of her own drama, she excerbated drama between the other women (Adriana and Joanna). I really dont think Bravo will view her as expendable especially since she ended the season, not nearly as polarizing with viewers as she was early on

I thought they started off weak but gradually grew
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I skimmed some of the 1982 synopses; Steve was planning on an opening an office in Finland, and I think Jim went there as part of the preparation.
    • That makes sense. What a messy time for the show. And any changes they made were mostly for the worse.
    • The transition from Neal to Adam was very abrupt, and to be honest my theory is that the character of Neal was designed so that we think he is super shady but then it turns out that he was on the side of good all along so Neal could have seamlessly become a hero of the BCPD with no need for Adam. I don't know whether Robert Lupone was hired on a short contract or if he was fired from a longer-term contract because they decided they wanted someone who was more of a leading man type, but I can imagine a scenario where Charles Grant did both the undercover Egyptian treasure/flirt with Victoria and the straighter-arrow day to day police investigation. But in my imagined scenario the MJ prostitution plotline probably doesn't exist and instead he probably continues a relationship with Victoria. The story seems very odd to me. I assume that David Canary would have been included only because a plotline where Steve is going to Finland in which only Rachel is seen in actual Finland seems unlikely. The synopses explicitly mention that Alice can't go with Steve but would whoever was playing Alice at that time have had the kind of clout to get the remote cancelled? It also strikes me as unlikely that production would have approved the expensive location shoot and *then* cancelled it only because of jealousy. It seems more likely that they rejected it because of the expense but then the jealousy part got added to the gossip speculatively, possibly because while it was being worked out they justified not including more castmembers because of the expense. 
    • My comment has nothing to do with cast resentment, but does relate to the Finland location shoot: It may be a coincidence, but Jim Matthews died in Finland in 1982.  Hugh Marlowe's final episode was in April 1982, but the character probably didn't die untll May or June. (I'm unable to find the character's date of death, only the date of Marlowe's final episode). SInce Jim and Rachel had very little interaction after around 1975, it is unlikely Jim's death in Finland had any connection to Rachel's potential visit, but the choice to have Jim die in that location at that time is a head-scratcher.  I'm sure the writers sent Jim on an extended trip (and off-screen) because of Marlowe's illness.  But Finland seems like a strange choice considering the (then) recently cancelled location shoot.  
    • I totally understand your sloths concern about it and I agree with you. Let’s hope the show plays it’s cards right.    Further comments about the last few episodes: - I liked that one of the attendees was filming the scene. That’s realistic. I wonder if the writers will follow up with that.  - Martin and Smitty trying to drag Leslie out was very heteronormative, so perfectly in line with them two as characters lol.    As for the future: it’s obvious the Duprees will come to accept Eva one way or another, but the rivalry with Kay should be here for the long term   On the topic of acting: the only bad actors I’m seeing are Ted and Derek. Tomas hasn’t proven to be either good or bad, so far, but he’s certainly mediocre and uncharismatic. He sucks the energy out of the scenes and I don’t see any couple of women ever vying for him. 
    • I’m trying to think which actors VW were working with at the time, and none of them had been there for a while. Even like Mac and Ada didn’t have that big of a part in Rachel’s storyline.  And Jamie was involved with all that movie stuff.
    • Brooke did ads before ATWT too. That probably helped get her the job. After ATWT she seemed to branch more into hosting, along with ads.  I think I saw Kelley in an ad or two, but you're right she wasn't on as much. 
    •   Thanks for sharing these. I wonder if Charles might have been in the running for Adam. I know Preacher was a bit of a bad boy at times on EON, but Neal seemed to be a step down, and Robert Lupone had played a similar part on AMC. Given the huge cast turnover at this point I wonder who thought they had been there long enough to go.  Laura Malone/Chris Rich would get a remote within the next year. 
    • Interesting.  It seems to allude to that statement that Warren Burton made around that time about some AW actors getting special treatment.  I wonder who was resentful about not getting to go. 
    • Good morning, boys!  I figured that it was time that our Gio was introduced into the hotness thread

      Please register in order to view this content

      @ranger1rg I even included a close up of his face for ya!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy