Jump to content

Ken Corday(and others)talk about changes they'd make


Recommended Posts

  • Members

FMB's comment about no more VCRs could apply to ratings for TV as a whole.

Jeanne Cooper's comments are crazily on point.

IMO, ratings are a problem in large part due to the timeslot. Nobody is home anymore at 2pm to watch ATWT or OLTL (two shows that deserve the viewership). So for [!@#$%^&*]'s sake, move soaps to between 5-8pm when people can actually WATCH. It's a no-brainer. Reducing them to half-hour shows might also relieve some of the daily stress on writers and actors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 19
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Michael Malone (former OLTL headwriter)

"Everyone is working as hard as they can to put on this beautiful,hour long drama five days a week,but you're constrained by time,as well as the physical limits of the studio,actors and crew.

It would be wonderful if we could find a way to take a breather.For example,maybe suspend production of the show in the summer,and use that time to reintroduce people to the show.I'm not talking about reruns.I mean figure out a way to recap what's happened the past year,so that when we start fresh in the fall,everyone is clued in to what's going on.It's necessary,because in many ways daytime isn't a very user friendly medium;you have to know what's happening with the chracter to enjoy it.Having some form of recap in the summer would allow people to find out what's going on with the show,and also has the potential to help hook new young viewers.

Another thing I would change is the fear that seems to be present when it comes to competing with talk shows.You don't want daytime trying to match the lurid .freak show horrows presented on these vile programs,but at the same time you don't want the medium to retreat into a safe kind of blandness,either.Soaps have always taken risks and they need to continue to do so.

One of the things I'd like to see in terms of risk is less reliance on the old literal conventions.One of the commandments of daytime is that the audience won't care about anyone they haven't known for a long time.This puzzles me.don't we walk into a movie and instantly care about the chracters up on the screen?One of the reasons primetime shows like NYPD Blue or ER are so successful is that they've managed totake the episodic form-which gives the audience the satisfaction of a beginning,middle and end=and they've embedded it within the larger arc of the emoyional lives of the characters.This is what daytime needs to do.

My feeling is that if daytime doesn't change it will die.ome people may think,'Well,why shouldn't it?Other forms of entertainment have come and gone as audience needs have changed.Look at programs like The Ed Sullivan Show.'But there's something about this genre that goes to the heart of why people love stories,and if it can find a way to express itself in a more contemporary way,I think it will be arounf for another 30 years."

Malone has some interesting ideas,but fails to show how they would work.His summer recap proposal is vague.Is he talking 3 months of best of scenes?Summer was traditionally peak viewing for soaps and I don't think the audience would stand for it.It might work for a couple of weeks where characters reminisced about the past year,but that wouldn't provide the break he feels is necessary.

I remember Sunset Beach did a weeks worth of shows like this early on as they regrouped after the first few months(and poor ratings)

As for his idea of a more episodic approach,again it's hard to make it workable.Would a specific story last a week,or a month?The risk is that viewers might turn off if the next story doesn't appeal.how would it work in terms of characters?For example,lets say the story was Viki dealing with a stroke.Would that story run every day for say 4 weeks,with every scene about that,or would there be 2 or 3 close ended stories at a time?

The thing is ,soaps are continuing stories.Otherwise,maybe they should try novela style shows.Say 4 a year,3 months each.However,that would be a much more expensive proposition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It'sfunny he would say that since he and Gottlieb flirted with the short term, new character stories when he came to the show (like the Craig Wasson spousal abuse story) and they quickly realized they didn't work... 96 was when Griffith left him as co writer and he seemed pretty burned out though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Michael Malone: "One of the commandments of daytime is that the audience won't care about anyone they haven't known for a long time. This puzzles me. Don't we walk into a movie and instantly care about the characters up on the screen?"

Not necessarily. Even with a movie, you still need the first act in order to introduce the main characters properly. Besides which, movies are not soap operas. God. Apples, meet oranges.

(No wonder I can't stand this man's work.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Stephen Schnetser (Cass AW)

"It's time for daytime to shake things up,really push the envelope.We need to look at what are the trends in television,and instead of sticking to the tried and true formulas,imitate what's popular.i think that's what AW has been doing since Jill Farren Phelps has come on board.She came in here and said,'Gee,we have a police station and a hospital-just like NYPD Blue and ER.how can we use this tio our advantage?

Some people might think it doesn't make sense to look for primetime for inspiration,but I think it does.Everything is derivatave anyway;we all steal from movies,and when you get down to it,there are really only 12 storylines in the world,and everything else that's done is just a variation of those 12.We should be experimenting more,trying to redifine our identity.I'm not sating throw out the past.But if daytime isn't pulling in the numbers it used to-and it isn't-then what's the harm in experimenting?We've got nothing to lose."

Well,JFP's time on AW hardly set the world on fire.The show became very contrived,with characters constantly hurt or in trouble to make use of the sets.The imitation of NYPD and ER went as far as people working in those settings,but there were no in depth stories of police or medical workers dealing with the stress of work and it's effect on their personal lives.

As for imitating what's popular,Avatar is the biggest movie ever,so let's have John McBain called by the government to go to another planet,where he falls in love with a native girl.

AW once had an identity,but it was trashed and never recovered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I have a very different view of Dano. For one thing, she like me, loves her little dogs. Another thing, of course she is effusive, outgoing but she is also very vulnerable & she used to have her Frank, her mother & Vivian who officially was her publicist (I think) but she was so much more. Now, they are all gone. Well, except for her always having a pair of her little dogs. But, if I were going to think in your terms, what I would think is "cool aunt". Because this lady is really one cool dame. Here is one of my favorite views of her https://www.instagram.com/reel/DGecq8rJS4w/
    • NBC Press Photo, text, from Jason47's files on daytimeroyalty

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I found it to be a rather odd way to deal with a character departing for parts unknown.
    • Today reminded me as to why I’m a little disappointed in the name that the new Pope chose

      Please register in order to view this content

      Luckily, EJ and Johnny, and pretty much every other character saved today’s episode.  I didn’t expect Javi to be the one to save Sarah though, and I don’t mind it at all, because if it means that Javi is finally going to get his own identity/character, away from his douchy bf, I’m all for it. Javi’s scenes would’ve been a lot better had it not been for him. EJ and Johnny were the best part of today. Their conversation hit a lot of important beats and I’m so looking forward to seeing them play out. And now that EJ knows that Johnny is going to work for Xander, that opens up another dynamic to their storyline and to the Kiriakis family storylines as well. Tying them all together could be really good. There are so many story possibilities that can come out of this. And I thought Carson Boatman did a pretty good job again too.  I also liked that Johnny was there to comfort Chanel after everything that happened with Sarah. They’re so good together. But I do have mixed feelings about Chanel possibly forgiving Johnny so quickly. Hopefully, the question that she asked him at the end of today leads to more conflict for the two of them.  And yeah, still no changes in Alex’s character lol 
    • Awesome, thanks so much for taking the time to grab this episode. I had a quick review of your rip because I was curious why it was 700MB and 30 minutes. The first 10 minutes of the episode is 3169 (opening credits at 5 minutes and again at 15 minutes). I thought we had the full HD version of ep.3170 on the YouTube channel, but it appears they added the wrong episode but labelled it 3170. 
    • I guess, according to Mike Manning in the Michael Fairman chat, he was almost Derek 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • OIC Thanks. I saw thzt & looked for a prior  ... never mind. 
    • I imagine Brad will blow through all the money in a year and come crawling back, just as Portia warned him not to.
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy