Jump to content

Lorraine Broderick as AMC head writer


Recommended Posts

  • Members

They were the ones who had Kirk vanish, yes.

All I ever saw with Eddie was a lot of tics. He got way too much airtime too early, and I don't think Marston was able to handle it. The lesser amount of airtime he got on OLTL is probably one of the reasons he managed to last 4-5 years without imploding for good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 722
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

DePriest's relationship with the ABC soaps has seemed odd to me. She's most famous for her more over the top work at DAYS, creating Where the Heart Is, Sunset Beach... But ABC and FMB brought her into a sagging AMC, temporarily it seems, to help put things back on track around 89. And OLTL briefly tried to do the same with hiring her right at thevery end of Rauch's era. She just seems an odd choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I resent this R :P I've always respected and enjoyed your opinion, and you can (and do often) disagree with me all you want. But I watched live every day and as soon as McTavish's stuff was known to air (the fourth of July week) we got a number of great scenes, the show suddenly was about family again, she quickly turned the focus back one established characters, etc. I'm not sure how long it lasted if at all, and we were into McTavish's tricks pretty quick but it's not a myth to me that I believe if I saw it live and absolutely feel that way (and a number of people on here, like Steve, who were against McTavish coming back did, briefly temporarily, admit she had quickly vastly improved the show. Sure maybe anyone coulda improved the show at that point, but...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I distinctly remember calling a former colleague of mine, upon hearing of McT's rehiring in 2003. I asked him rhetorically, "what are they thinking?" I thought I knew McT's pattern very well, and I actually DO. But he gave me a take that hadn't previously occurred to me. He said, "oh, she'll start out strong. She may even go for a long while on good stuff... but there'll be a price to pay at some point down the road... then watch out!"

And he was so right. She comes on to a show with big promises and she makes a big splash upon entrance. It's almost as if she quickly lulls the viewers into a false sense of security. Then there's this point where she goes, particularly with AMC, "AHA! THIS SHOW IS MIIIINE!!!" Then we get the character-decimating, history-trashing, and general insulting audience intelligence. And in hindsight, we realize that - ONCE AGAIN - she was resorting to her usual back of tricks she always has, and we didn't notice: rape, evil twins, implausible-and-pointless dead character resurrections, bombs and explosions... She's used rape and evil twin dual roles AT LEAST three times on just AMC alone.

And then she crashes the show into a firey fusilage, gets fired (this last time WAY TOO LONG after she wrecked things), and we feel burned, duped, and pissed off.

I know it's shallow, but I've always heard McT was so possessive of AMC largely because of jealously toward Lorraine Broderick. Broderick won the Emmys, she was Agnes Nixon's favorite, and so on... So I have to admit that I was a little thrilled to hear that she was second choice to LB back in 2003, and I'm mega-thrilled that LB will be back again, and will likely be the last of the two to be involved with the show. In a way, she'll be helping repair damages that occurred even when McT is still in place....

ETA: I don't want people to take this the wrong way. McTavish has always been very nice to the soap press, a sweet person and accessible. But at the same time, it was easy to see that she was a little insecure and a little manic about her role, especially when it was regarding AMC. When she talked about her storylines, and we knew they were VERY bad, what was alarming was how sincerely oblivious she was to that. She honestly thought whatever she was doing was good and "true" to AMC... all of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I hadn't heard about his story problems--care to elaborate? Of course at Y&R he always had top writing staff

As for being a jerk... I dunno I do think AMC could use an EP who actually has a vision and sticks to it for once--they haven't since FMB (someone some ofthe cast didn't get alon gwith, keep in mind) I mean JHC sounds a bit like a jerk too but she has none of the positives that can come with it.

Thanks--I do actually remember Miles and wondering what happened to him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I dunno if WW would ever return--nearly all of his work was still done to some extent under Agnes' guidelines, he's old, a known big family man and has had no soap connections since leaving--I doubt there's any desire to return.

Those credits are kinda arguable--like wikipedia's are Wisner's name wasn't on as headwriter on many episodes in the time he wa slisted there, for example--not saying he wasn't one of the headwriters, but... (that said I loved the Will murder even if it did seem to become a template for all the, poorer, murder mysteries, especially under McTavish to come)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I did think there were some strong moments when she returned. The rape story with Bianca was sick and wrong but it had a very powerful narrative which carried over for many months.

I also thought some of her 1998 return had some strong moments (Stuart/Marian, Opal's son Adrian, Dixie's illness), although most of that was overshadowed by her bizarre carnie material, and then Kit Fisher. Really, the only good thing carnies ever gave AMC was Myrtle.

I have always felt like she can be a strong writer if someone holds her hand and says do this, do that, do this, do that. I would say if she has characters she enjoys, but she seemed to dearly love Brooke, Tad, and Dixie, and she did some damage to Brooke in 1998 and she did horrific damage to Tad all through her second run. I guess the only character she loved that she never really damaged was Jackson.

She has high highs and low lows. Unfortunately, the lows seem to win out, but I would be lying if I didn't say that some of her material is still some of the better memories I have of AMC over the past decade (of course some of her material brings the worst memories).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think your list is as good as possible--the problem is much of this will have to remain guest work (just like Agnes Nixon did do a lot of the HW during the time you have credited to W Washam and as I said her named headed the Emmy writing list for AMC every year till at least 96 I believe)

I believe she wasoffered GL as a co HW--so made the move on her own

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

To be fair, as Loyal to AMC said FMB was brought in to tighten the stories--and I have heard from a number of people who watched back then that it's true, while by our current standards the show probably rocked, around 1988 many people did feel (and the ratings showed this) AMC was in need of a minor overhaul in terms of on and off screen decisions. I still think DePriest (whose work I like--I'd love to see Where the Heart is--while I don't love the over the top style of soap opera she was best known for I do think out of the people who did that kind of soap her stuff was amongst the best--I even liked her time at SuBe the best) was an odd choice and it was prob smart she didn't stay too long, but it does seem that her and especially FMB did help turn the show around as they were meant to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ha I always thought the Eric Kane as a clown story was one of the 1988 stories that caused the overhaul, but I do think there are a couple of DePriest episodes on youtube and they do show her slightly more over the top take on Pine Valley (as well as how quickly FMB did improve the production quality of the show)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Passanante fled to ATWT among rumours AMC was firing her. This is why for a few months that Fall AMC had no headwriter (we were stuck with Ghost Jesse, etc) I believe why she had some reputation left was maybe she took credit for some of the better stuff when she was listed as co headwriter with Agnes, but she did have a very good rep as an associate writer on OLTL starting under the Malone/Griffith era and I believe that was the position she initially returned to on ATWT?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I saw a new BTG promo during Watson tonight (Sunday May 11).   I don't remember what I saw (and I wouldn't say here on the nonspoiler thread anyhow). I know only that it was different from the "next on BTG" preview at the end of Friday's episode. If anyone catches the new promo, please post it on the spoiler thread.
    • I hope GH gives Lesley an on screen memorial I'd love to have Scott, Robert, Holly, Rose Kelly, Mike Webber, Blackie Parish  & Claudia Phillips return for the episodes
    • As requested by @BoldRestless the 1976 story summary of Y&R from the Daytime serial newsletter. I will post it in parts as it is quite detailed.  Pt 1 Set in Midwestern Genoa City, The Young and the  Restless, which premiered four years ago, is the story of the Brooks and Foster families. Jennifer and Stuart Brooks are, on the surface, the perfect couple, blessed with four beautiful daughters, but under the veneer of a first impression lie cracks in the facade. Jennifer had become dissatisfied with her marriage after the birth of her oldest daughter, Leslie, and had left Stuart with the idea of returning to her former fiancé, Dr. Bruce Henderson. After later reconciling with Stuart, Jennifer found she was pregnant with Laurie, and she has lived all these years with the suspicion that Laurie may be Bruce’s daughter. Leslie  has recovered from a nervous breakdown and is now a famous concert pianist, happily married to former Surgeon now newspaperman Brad Elliot.  . Chris Brooks is married to Dr. William (Snapper) Foster, and Peggy, the youngest Brooks daughter, is a college student. Jennifer recently left Stuart a second time, considering again a life with Bruce, but the discovery of a lump in her breast followed by a mastectomy for cancer has again changed her priorities.   Laurie, meanwhile, has been dating Dr. Mark Henderson, Bruce’s son.  Snapper’s mother, Liz Foster, had finally accepted the fact that her husband, Bill, had abandoned their family and had had him declared dead when he suddenly walked back into their lives, suffering from emphysema. Jill, Liz and Bill’s only daughter, was married to Phillip Chancellor, the father of her unborn child, just hours before his death. Phillip obtained a quick Caribbean divorce upon learning of his impending fatherhood and was badly injured when his now-ex-wife, Kay, meeting him at the airport upon his return, lost control of the car when he told her of his plans to marry Jill. After Phillip’s death Kay vowed to void his marriage to Jill and deprive Jill of |his estate. Kay’s son from her first marriage, Brock Reynolds, supports Jill in her claim, but Kay, a former alcoholic, cannot accept the idea of having lost Phillip to her former paid companion. Greg Foster, Jill and Snapper’s brother, is an attorney working for Legal Aid, where Chris is his assistant. Upon learning that her daughter Lauralee has become engaged to Dr. Bruce Henderson’s son Mark,Jennifer Brooks tells Mark she suspects he and.Laurie are half brother and sister. She explains she spent a week with Bruce after a bad fight with her husband, Stuart, when she believed their marriage was over. A blood test confirms her fears—Stuart cannot be Laurie’s father. Keeping what he’s learned to himself,Mark painfully breaks his engagement to Laurie and leaves town. Laurie is shattered by this, unable to understand what went wrong. But soon she begins to put bits and pieces together and confronts hermother, asking what she said to Mark that drove him away. Jennifer finally tells her daughter the truth and stands helplessly as Laurie turns to run to her father for comfort and suddenly realizes he’s not her father—even this her mother has taken from her. Laurie follows Mark to Cleveland and tries to persuade him that they can still be married—they need not have children—only to be hurt again when Mark sadly tells her their love would become dirty and they would wind up hating themselves and each other. Heart broken, Laurie agrees to let him go. Jennifer has recently left Stuart, due to growing frustration in her marriage, and had planned to marry Bruce, but discovery of breast cancer and a subsequent mastectomy caused her to reconsider her plans. When Stuart earnestly pleaded with her to come home to him and their daughters after her recovery, she agreed, but now her guilt over Laurie’s situation has caused her to waver. When Laurie confides the truth to her older sister Leslie, Les makes it clear to her mother that she finds the idea that Jennifer would think of returning to her father contemptible. But Brad Elliot,Leslie’s husband, warns her to hide her feelings or her father will notice and ask for an explanation.Jennifer gives in to Stuart’s wishes, and he welcomes her home as his wife again. Leslie has had two more piano-concert triumphs and basks in the attention of the music world, as well as that of Lance Prentiss, a wealthy industrialist who has been following her career with avid interest. Les invites Lance home to Genoa City, hoping the dynamic, handsome young titan of business can help distract Laurie from her heartbreak. With the birth of Jill Foster’s baby imminent, Kay Chancellor offers Jill one million dollars for the child —fathered by her late husband, Phillip Chancellor. After Phillip’s death Kay had the divorce ruled invalid and voided Jill’s marriage, making her unborn child illegitimate. But now, finally acknowledging Jill’s baby as Phillip’s, Kay tells Jill she can give the child the Chancellor name and social position, as well as the love she had for Phillip. Jill, torn by love for Phillip and his baby and the extreme financial need of her family (Jill’s father is dying of emphysema and needs a warm, dry climate), realizes that Kay can give her child everything he could need, things Jill could never provide, and agrees to Kay’s terms.  Jill’s son, Phillip Chancellor Foster, is born prematurely a few days later. Liz Foster, Jill’s mother, is horrified that Jill would “sell” her son to Kay, and Jill’s father, Bill, is horrified that it is concern for his health that led Jill to this arrangement. He would rather die than give up his grandson. But when Jill, who has avoided seeing her child, has to take physical custody of him in order to deliver him to Kay, she is suddenly unable to give him up.
    • tagging @Troppo who tracks B&B episode number anomalies -- see above posts.
    • Thanks!!

      Please register in order to view this content

        haha you did good explaining all that. So basically Monday's episode is gonna be what was suppose to be Friday's episode. Even though CBS and PPlus uploaded Monday's Aka Friday's show before they deleted it? LOL
    • I do mean those two, but when I download them, the Chris from Greece version is from RTL with subtitles and starts with a doctor greeting Stephanie and the rsclassicfanfanforever version is from Videoland, no subtitles and starts with Tawny and Becky? Sorry if this was already discussed. Is the Chris version merged with another episode? That one is longer.
    • B&B episode Episode #9521 (Season 38, Episode 162) was scheduled for Thurs. May 8. It was officially preempted, although some areas saw it, (Some areas saw the Steffy/Finn/Monaco rerun on May 8.) cbs.com and PPlus had 9521 (S38,E162) uploaded on May 8, despite it being preempted from that date, and they never took it down. B&B officially aired #9521 (S38, E162) on broadcast CBS television on Fri. May 9. B&B officially postponed the next episode #9522 (Season 38, Episode 163) to air on Mon. May 12. cbs.com and PPlus had #9522 (S38, E163) uploaded Fri. May 9, despite it not airing yet on broadcast tv until Mon. May 12. cbs.com and PPlus still had the early upload of 9522/S38,E163 available on their websites for about a day and a half, LOL,... (even though it doesn't air until May 12)... and then they finally removed it from their websites.   ALSO... at the same time as removing 9522/S38,E163 . . . .  cbs.com and PPlus fixed the website label for #9521 (S38, E162), which had displayed as "May 8" but now correctly says "May 9". --------------------------- Meanwhile, B&B in Canada "ctv.ca" Canada uploaded #9521 (S38, E162) on Thurs. May 8, because they didn't realize at first that it was preempted in USA. Eventually ctv.ca Canada deleted the early upload of S38,E162. But then... "ctv.ca" Canada didn't re-upload #9521 (S38, 162), even after it aired in the USA officially on May 9. And apparently they were afraid to upload anything new, so for a couple of days, the most recent episode available  on ctv.ca was Wed. May 7,  #9520 (S38, E161). Finally  "ctv.ca" Canada uploaded *BOTH* of these: #9521 (S38, 162) (USA official airdate Fri. May 9)... And #9522 (S38, 163) (USA official airdate Mon. May 12)... listing it as as Monday May 12 and it's still on their website. --------------------------- Meanwhile, B&B in Australia: "10play.com.au" fast-track Australia seemed to know what to do. They waited until 9521 aired in USA officially before uploading to their site. They haven't uploaded 9522 yet. (I don't have access to view Australia episodes, but I can see their menu. I kept checking their website multiple times over the past few days, and I saw the thumbnails and episode descriptions.)  ------------------- That was extremely confusing for me to type up. I probably made some errors. LOL.
    • The one that Christos did would be the RTL Lounge recording (without end credits and subtitles) and the one @rsclassicfanforever did would be the Videoland version with end credits and no subtitles). Is that what you mean by two versions? @BoldRestless
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy