Jump to content

All Soaps: The Killing of Legendary Characters


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Death happens in real life, unexpectedly, but on soaps sometimes it can hurt the show. Which ones have hurt a show in the long run? Has there ever been a death of a legendary character, one who's rooted in the fabric of the show, where it hasn't hurt the show as much as other's would have thought? Would the now reversed death of Phillip Chancellor III be an example of that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I agree that Maureen Bauer's death really hurt Guiding Light, but it wasn't the death of that show. In all honesty, at that point in time, Guiding Light still had over 50 years of history to draw from and appoint a new matriarch. There was Nadine Cooper (who of course they destroyed), there was Vanessa Chamberlin, Holly Thorpe, they could have certainly brought back Nola Rearden sooner and did more with that. They could have turned Beth Raines into the new matriarch, Beth Chamberlin is certainly a very competent actress. An impact is often felt when the death of a legacy character takes place, but the show must still go on and with a strong writer, a new successor will rise up and take the place of it's predecessor.

In regard to Phillip Chancellor III, his death had a real impact on the show which drove story for years. Katherine once said to Jill, "You will never escape me." Katherine was responsible for the death of Phillip II, the love of Jill's life. Jill blamed Katherine for the death of her son, Phillip. There was an irony in that story which held true to that sick bond between Kay and Jill. Something that would keep their rivalry going for decades to come. That when Phillip IV was old enough to learn the history between those two women, he would see how his father really died and understand the cause of his death and the deep rooted hatred between his grandmother and Kay. Maybe it would have been better for Phillip to fall into a coma and when he woke, he left Genoa City. But that wasn't the path Bell chose and maybe Bell thought it was a mistake to kill off Phillip III, but it did not hurt Y&R. I personally believe that the death of Phillip III should have never been reversed. Furthermore, Bell wrote strong women, and Nina, Kay and Jill were and still are strong women. His death allowed us to see them develop into a more stronger role, the widowed mother and wife (Nina), the damaged mother who lost both her husband and son (Jill), the woman who took away his father and carried such deep regrets (Kay).

As for General Hospital, Georgie's death was unnecessary, as was AJ Quartermaine's, Emily Quartermaine's, Stefan Cassadine, Kristina Cassadine, Justus Ward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A big pet peeve of mine is killing off legendary characters, only to have them return as ghosts soon after killing them off. Alan Quartermaine, John Abbott & James Stenbeck are three of the more recent examples.

Also, if you're going to kill off legendary characters, please don't insult our intelligence and bring them back 20 years later - i.e. Jesse on AMC and Phillip on Y&R.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

killing them doesnt bother me. like losing Georgie on GH for example was a big loss, but it could have been okay if the death was done right (not like it was..) the fallout was played for every beat (the start of it was then they dropped the ball with everyone but Maxie, and even now they have moved her past it) and they have other like characters around (they didnt. and losing Emily a month before didnt help)

Its all in how its done.

I dont think anyone on any soap is untouchable actually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think anyone should be "safe" but it has to be done well or else the show will suffer. If shows were written properly it shouldnt matter but when they put their eggs in the same basket with characters then take a chance and kill that character off, the show suffers for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think killing off Stuart Chandler will hurt AMC in the long run. AMC has a short supply of characters like him. I think TPTB have killed too many characters in recent years and a lot of those deaths have been very short sighted and the fall out has been poorly done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

^^ I bet you anything they did that so they don't have to pay DC twice. Apparently, since he is credited twice, he must be paid twice as per SGA rules. I read that once. I bet other people's nose were out of joint they didnt get twins. Watch Pratt bring on a second Luner... twice the actress that doesn't disagree with him :) That'll show all the others right? LET THIS BE AN EXAMPLE TO THE REST OF YA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thank you it really pisses me off when they KO them but I have to look at a friggin' ghost what is the point dramatically its asinine

I agree that people die in real life but this is a drama, fiction many deaths of core characters alienate viewers and are senseless plot points that lead nowhere

GH has not and probably will never fully recovered from the quick deaths of Emily/Alan/ Georgie all in the same year.

When a core character dies it should mean something there should be serious drama around them prior to their demise. Not just some sweeps stunt,

which most of them are. I'll never get over them koing Georgie then handing her storyline with Spinelli to Maxi. It was more than obvious what was going on here. Prior to that Georgie was literally pouring the their fav whom was being highly marketed coffee at Kellys. I knew then she was on her way out.

Emily is a very much needed character IMO and there is a big hole in the show with her gone that Rebecca can never fill for me.

These dramas are about old (history) as well as new characters being introduced for me. There is so much that they give the bum's rush to and waste my time with their newbies while I'm still waiting for old story to play out.

Can it hurt the show? Absolutely IMO most of the deaths do why kill off popular characters?

It doesn't make sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Yes, of course, all of those servants added to the overall picture at AW & also people had relationships with those servants! I like it when Anita asks after one of the servants at the club, how their children are doing & like that. 
    • Great scenes between Marlena and EJ today. Paula and Jeanne are making EJ have more depth than Ron had during his long drawn out tenure.
    • Might as well say it, Minority opinion, granted, but I like Joss & I'm okay with this WSB story & i hope that Emma will be their next recruit & she & Joss can be partners.
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven  The Arlene/Ben/Betsy triangle is one I wish I could see for myself as on paper it doesn't tend to excite me but I can see how well-constructed it was. I wish I could see the Rick/Meg relationship too, although I wish they'd had him genuinely fall for Meg after he gets together with Cal. The whole Brooke/Deacon/Bridget story on B&B was horribly damaging to Brooke as a character but it was dramatically very sound because I could completely believe Deacon would fall for messy and vulnerable Brooke after finally settling down with the more docile Bridget.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • According to the head writer list, it seems the show may have started to fall apart while either the Schneiders or Upton were writing.  And when it started to crumble, it crumbled fast.  It was sad to see everything Labine had brought to LOL be disassembled.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Abraham!!!!!

      Please register in order to view this content

      Welcome back!!! And I see Abe and Paulina got a new apartment too, which is just a redress of John/Marlena’s, Steve/Kayla’s, etc. But it looks kinda nice. And I enjoyed his scenes with Chanel. It added another perspective to everything that’s been going on with her and Johnny. And Abe using his own history with Lexie to comfort Chanel was a good idea. Plus, it also provided us with more suspicion/red herring about Johnny possibly shooting EJ. I’m looking forward to see what happens between her and Johnny. And I’m so glad that the two of them are on the frontburner now.  Speaking of Johnny, I still have no problem with him going to work for Titan. The drama could be so good, especially once EJ finds out. To me, it seems like another realistic reaction to everything that’s been happening to Johnny lately. It doesn’t seem random and over the top either. And I like that they remembered to have Johnny tell Xander that he has no corporate experience whatsoever. Surprisingly, the two of them work well together. And so do Carson and Deidre. I love how the Marlena/Johnny relationship has been featured so much.  Kayla was still strong and kicking ass today too. The writer change has helped her/Mary Beth so much. But I do admit we should’ve seen Steve trying to get into Dr. Russell’s lab rather than Kayla instructing him over the phone.  And unfortunately, Chad and Cat still don’t seem to be doing much for me though. The cliffhanger was ok too.   Btw, Days was trending at #4 this morning on Peacock
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy