Jump to content

Another World


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 13.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Wow, so great to see Courtney during her final weeks.  Courtney is clearly not the focus of this scene (Marianne is the focus), but watch Courtney's detailed acting.  The looks she gives her father, while Marianne speaks. And the way she strokes her niece's hair near the end of the scene.   

Now, imagine Susan Harney playing the same script.  It would not have been terrible. In fact, Harney would have been quite acceptable in this scene.  But none of Alice's subtext would have been exhibited.  None of Jacquie Courtney's nuance.  The scene would have been played rather flat, with Alice being a side character.    

History shows it is nearly impossible to successfully and permanently replace a TV soap opera ingenue.  Think about efforts to replace the following: Alice Frame, Tara Martin, Nina Cortlandt, Penny Hughes, Marley Love Hudson, Lily Walsh, Lily Winters among others. And even Mary Ryan (who I hesitate to describe as an ingenue, but perhaps). For reasons I do not understand, soap opera ingenues seem almost impossible to replace.    

Edited by Mona Kane Croft
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Courtney was a very warm actress, but not in a gooey way, more in a very dignified way, like what you imagine royalty to be. I can't speak for her OLTL run as much, but you can always feel that in her AW work. It was especially striking to me when she came back one last time in 1989 as the show by then was populated by performers who were so different to her. She was almost ethereally vulnerable even as she was mature and restrained - those moments she had with Rachel were beautiful. 

I remember Lauralee Bell going on about how hard it is to play an ingenue or a "good" character. I'd generally agree with her.

Recasting can work sometimes but in many cases it doesn't, especially when viewers have a special connection with a performer. That performer is what strings the character together for them. You have to have that poise and integrity to make the inner life of a long-suffering character work. There are some performers where I don't really love watching them that much, but I respect the obvious effort it took (like Lauren Marie Taylor and Noelle Beck on Loving).

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Totally agree.  That final brief scene with Rachel, where they share a few words.  Rachel scurries off, and the camera focuses on Alice.  The look on her face said more than any words from a script.  Thankfully somebody (I assume the director) allowed Jacquie to play Alice according to her instincts, and it worked perfectly -- even in 1989.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's very true. I do respect the efforts the show made for the anniversary compared to many soap anniversaries - there were certainly issues (the Gwen mess, and as much as my heart went out to Iris in spite of her many failings, I'm not sure Robert would have been so forgiving, even all those years later), but Alice's return was a big success. I wish they'd had her come back for the 30th too but I suppose the show had changed even more by that point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Courtney never should have been let go in 1985.  Just as she left, they were setting up a good story with amnesiac Rachel digging into her past with Alice.  At that point, Rachel wanted nothing to do with Mac, and she moved out of the Cory mansion.  This was the perfect opportunity to have Mac date Alice again and set up a triangle- this time with Alice having the upper hand on Rachel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Hmm.  Maybe I got my dates wrong, but I was referring to the Alice/Rachel scene at the end of Mac's funeral.  That was at least several months after the 25th anniversary, but maybe still in 1989.  Not sure.   Anyway, that was Courtney's final scene on AW.   

But the 25th anniversary episodes definitely had both high points and low points.   That much is for sure.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Maybe I am misremembering, but I thought Malone sued and won and that she publicly discussed her claim that her firing was because of her weight. And that her version of the falling out was that she didn't know why Rich and Frangione had become cold to her. Which sounded like we were expected to infer that Chris Rich thought it reflected badly on him for Sandy to have a fat wife so he wanted Malone pushed out. 

I have not been able to find any references to the lawsuit other than mentions in this and other forums. Maybe they settled out of court?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I question the story about Laura Malone suing and winning a settlement because there is nothing on-line about it - and as a faithful reader of Soap Opera Digest (I have all the back copies from the 80s & 90s) nothing was reported about any lawsuit by her

I wouldn't think she would have any grounds to sue - her contract expired and the show decided not to renew the contract. That is not wrongful termination. The contract expired and the show decided they didn't want to negotiate a new contract, nothing illegal about that.

This whole story about Laura Malone suing and getting a settlement seems to be a urban legend, because there is no evidence this ever happened. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy