Jump to content

Y&R History and character growth


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I have a question. I am a relatively new viewer and before I started watching consistently I was on and off. I was familiar with many characters and a few character dynamics before I started watching consistently a few years ago. Before consistent Y&R, I watched GH from about 1996 to 1999 (Loved that era though the quality of my experience started to decrease in the end of my viewership) the one thing I must say about many if not a few of the characters @ the time on GH was that there was an attempt to show character growth and also self recognition among individual characters. I love that now while MAB is at the helm there is a bit more logic and drive to each character. That self recognition among certain characters is a tool used in explaining certain character's drive (very few and inbetween). I realize a successful approach to telling character driven stories on soap is never to have the character change too much however as a viewer I'm curious as to whether or not I'll ever see character growth on a bell soap. Has history ever shown (on Bell soaps) a character having grown in some form without being regressed? I mean Kay/Jill dynamic, the Nikki-Victor-Ashlye dynamic which seems like it's about to rub off on the Newman offspring Nick with Sharon and Phyllis. These characters do the same things expect different results it seems, whereas the other soap I mentioned the characters sometimes learned from their mistakes or felt compelled to repeat them even though they know they are bad anyway. In that logic one can dedeuced that they feel or felt the end justified the means.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Very astute. While there has been growth, I'd say that it was very slow...and with lots of regressions ("two steps forward, one back"). Probably the only characters who seem to have shown real growth (i.e., no reversion lately) are Michael and Lauren. I guess Paul grew (from his sex-addicted younger self), but he's been in stasis for the last 20 years. Until his recent break from reality, Kevin had probably shown the most growth.

And there is Kay. Now the big hearted grande dame of Genoa City, there was a time when she was far more self-involved and narcissistic, seldom leaving her living room or the liquor bottle. It was Brock who encouraged her to do more with charity, as a way of breaking her cycle of self-involvement.

Victor did progress from the very hard hearted, untrusting soul he was when he first came on (with Julia). But again, in the LML era and since, I perceive a regression.

Nikki, ironically, showed the most growth through LML's era (early on, when she was a rock for Victor during his epilepsy) and later (when she was a rock for her family during Victoria's coma)...but again, she keeps reverting. I'm not sure of what to make of her today.

Again, during LML's era, I felt Nick made serious growth. He got over his paralyzing grief, and once he dissolved his marriage, he then FULLY committed to Phyllis, to honesty, to his family. He was also a rock for his father during the epilespy, putting the pain of the past behind. Alas, that has all been undone now....he's back to the same selfish rich kid he always was, IMO.

In Jack (and Victor) we see a lot of Wile E. Coyote/Roadrunner....permanent circularity of battle...zero growth. In the fact that Ashley is still hooked on Victor...very little growth.

So, yes, I'd say that in general absence of growth or reversion is a hallmark of this show (and B&B too).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Whenever I hear that a current soap is "honoring its history", I take pause, because in today's soap world, that often means character regression and recycled stories. The character regression for Victor, Ashley, Nikki, and Jill is one of the aspects of the current Y&R I hope they can improve upon. It reminds me of when Hogan was praised for "taking Craig back to his roots" on ATWT, which meant making him an unrepentant murderer and cruel bully who was permanently ruined.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

no show honours it's history quite like the Y&R and that is one reason why the show has stayed at #1 for so long when all the other soaps are trying to distance it self from it's history by getting rid of characters who help built the show. GH for example drives me nuts every time I turn the show on it seems like a differnt cast or the same character with a different face. Y&R is consistant and I love it for that reason. MAB has returned the show to it's roots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I don't, since they've clearly incorporated them into Tomas' storyline, and I happen to like his tattoos, but his jackets not fitting doesn't mean they're trying to cover his tattoos. The clothing overall isn't the issue; it's the fit. And I expect(ed) more from Jeresa Featherstone and her team. Very disappointed. He's the only male, overall, whose costume irritates me.
    • "And OMG, watching the scenes of Roger's return in comparison...the quality in the writing really nosedived. The stupid mask." Very much agreed.  Having Roger hide behind a mask for weeks/months, with it culminating with him swinging in on a vine at Blake/Phillip's wedding....geez.  So juvenile. IMO, Guiding Light never did a good job reintroducing major characters, either from the dead or elsewhere.  Masked balls = awful.  Amish = awful. When Reva was brought back from the dead, she should've just showed up in Springfield as Reva, and informed everyone that she had been gone for years because she felt like it.  She had a four-year fling with some dude who ended up dumping her due to disloyalty. Josh would be pissed and declare that their love is not *always* but *sometimes* and he'd act accordingly.  Her kids would hate her.   
    • Agreed. The Emmys next year are gonna be a pretty tough competition and I hope we get a Days sweep lol  Not only does Deidre deserve a nomination for these last few weeks, but I also think Paul Telfer, Raven Bowens, Carson Boatman, Dan Feuerriegel and Alison Sweeney have good chances as well.
    • It’s not about a lack of faith and trust in MVJ, it’s about a a lack of faith and trust in Ron Carlivati, who I think can be very sneaky and manipulative when he wants to be.  And, all that “He’s just a breakdown writer” talk never changed my mind about anything, because at Days, it was “just a breakdown writer” that gave us some of the worst episodes I’ve ever seen. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy