Jump to content

The Book of Clichés


Recommended Posts

  • Members

There was a thread... Long time ago, I know I bumped onto it by accident on Usenet that was very, very detailed. And I can’t find it now. (MarkH, I’m looking at you — if this sounds familiar, let me know.)

Anyway, I found another one and I'm going to quote some things from it, formatting a bit changed (look here):

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was thinking not too long ago about starting a list of cliche phrases from soaps.

"The press is going to have a FIELD day!"

"I don't know how to tell you this..."

"How long have you been standing there?" "Long enough!"

As for standard soap opera cliches, I have to add my personal pet peeve:

Someone is on the phone as they enter a room and the person on the other end of the phone is almost ALWAYS depicted as being a complete and utter moron, even if it's another character we know. "I don't care WHAT you have to do, damn it, just GET IT DONE!" and then the person hangs up on them in a huff.

Y&R does this A LOT. I always think "Damn, Jack's a total douche on the phone."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

When two characters go out of town, they are forced to share the same bed/hotel room. PSNs did this one time with Whitney and Chad, and having them separated by a sheet. Oh look! The sheet falls onto the bed, and the two end up in each other's arms= LAME!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, I think I said soaps are about clichés, but clichés well done. And I kind of agree with that and at the same time think some of them need to be banned if not permanently then for about 10 years or so (those JamesF listed in another thread, for example).

I think ideal soap storytelling is about "easy" yet brilliant twists and tales. Think Lost. For four f*cking seasons those people tried to get off the island and then BAM! "Kate, we have to go back!" Man! Some would say that is such an easy, obvious choice yet amazing. As if a gigantic hammer squashed your head, especially if you were spoiler-free.

A soap has to be a concatenated, inevitable sequence of events, one leading to the next one seamlessly flowing, how action provokes reaction. Newton's third law if you will: ""To every action there is an equal and opposite reaction." :P Your hero or heroine is in this whirlwind of events, nobody knows what the hell is happening, but everyone knows it's brilliant.

Soaps are about those 7 or 36 or [insert number] dramatic situations, each time done differently, diversely structured or something. But it has to flow. One event after the other after the other and so on. An avalanche. Not the jerky, spastic stop then go, stop then go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Honestly, I think cliches are the problem. Cliches remove unpredictability, and that is part of the reason people roll eyes and stay out of soaps.

On my Y&R right now, Sharon Newman has been sleepin' up a storm with at least three men. You just know -- no spoilers, I'm not aware of any -- that she's gonna turn up pregnant. Although I confirm that it will be interesting seeing that particular group of men do a "who's the daddy" story...on the other hand...didn't Billy Miller just go through that? Didn't Jack and Nick go through that with Summer? (Although, part of me wonders if this story is being engineered to get us to a blood test involving Jack and Nick...and that it will somehow lead to the reveal -- sob -- that Nick is not Summer's father. I'm just feelin' that, a little).

But, back to cliches in general. Outside of daytime, the shows I tend to like the most are those that surprise me...those that do an interesting spin on a genre. The Sopranos was great, because we'd never seen a family like that before. The first season of Brothers and Sisters was great, because we'd never quite seen a family like the Walkers--or a primetime show that (back then) so fully embraced political issues in the context of a prime titme soap. True Blood is great because -- really -- a soap opera romance between a vampire and a mind reader? I can't tell where it is going. I also tend to like independent films, because they often don't stick to the traditional premises of big studio films.

I actually think the secret to the evolution of the serial (when it happens--although I happen to think, from the list above, that it has happened) is to eschew the cliches or turn them on their ear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Community Posts

    • Totally agree. AL isn’t suited to Summer written this way (which is, truthfully, in character). HK wasn’t credible in the boss-bitch moments, which AL plays more easily.
    • Welcome back, Tripp 

      Please register in order to view this content

      I’m glad Tripp is back in Salem and I like that he’s planning on being more assertive. He doesn’t deserve to get hurt again. Though I wouldn’t be surprised if some people in the Soap Universe are gonna be mad about his lines today Hopefully, we get some scenes of Johnny/Tripp and Wendy/Chanel. There haven’t been that many lately and this storyline definitely needs them. I think weaving Talia into it would be a good idea as well. She needs a new man now that the Colin storyline is over.  Rafe is still dumb. There really are no security cameras at that hospital that could have shown that Colin didn’t take Abe?? Speaking of Abe, his storyline is total ff material. James Reynolds deserves so much better than this. 
    • I've been rewatching early SATC (am mid-season 2), and am enjoying the mid-90s indie film vibe of the show at that time. It was a bit tougher and grittier but it also showed some of the growing wealth of the city at that time. SATC was always about pecking order and jostling for a better position, but on the romantic frontlines. I also enjoyed the Bad Dating SLs LOL. I understand why it went the fairytale-ish route. Part of this mirrored the evolution of the city itself, as Manhattan became more moneyed and, dare I say, unaffordable. It was a glamorous city that many aspired to live in and conquer against the odds. Part of it was also, as the show progressed, our own growing investment in the main cast and their SLs. Hence less standalone episodes and more a continuing soapy story of romantic relationships. IMO, this was a fairly organic evolution.
    • Lanier is fine but I miss Hunter King as well. A lot of the material AL is struggling with currently HK would’ve had an easier time playing, she could knock out those bratty whiny freakout moments with little effort. AL’s Summer should be written as icier and more indignant.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy