Jump to content

AMC: APRIL FOOLS, UM, FIRST, 2009


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

All the best? Baby, haven't you heard? That's all I accept! :P

Thanks for the love.

Anyhow...

I think there are quite a few elements that are out of synch on the show right now. For me, it was clicking up until the holidays. Then, things were sped up, clearly messed around with, and now... I find myself groaning at all of these plot points.

People, for years, have run around town screaming about how living in the Chandler Mansion is the worst thing for any child. Now we're supposed to believe that JR's the best father ever and is able to give Little Adam the best home ever because... why? JR's been sober for four weeks? :rolleyes:

Ryan's going on and on and on about his love for Greenlee and how his whole world has been shattered as a result of her death -- but he's screwing Kendall exactly a month after Greenlee dies and is trying to move in with her? And Kendall allows it? WHAT?!

We already know how I feel about the whole "David Beat Krystal Because the Martins Say So" plot.

The only positive side of the whole Zendall vs. Rendall drama is that they're the only people (besides Aidan & Annie who are on far too little -- well, Annie, anyway. I can do without Aidan) that aren't obsessing about David. Every word out of everyone's mouth is "this is DAVID'S fault! This is HAYWARD'S fault! DAVID is the devil! HAYWARD'S a monster! DAVID this! DAVID that!" It's as if they have no lives, because all they do is sit together in their little groups and speak for about 5 minutes about how horrible David is. And then, my favorite, proceed to antagonize the man. I mean, seriously, Hubbards. Did ya think that hiding Little A in your ever-expanding Loft with add-on bedrooms was the best way to neutralize a man that needs very little provocation to mess with you? It's as if Babe's spirit really is taking over the town. You know... the whole "I make stupid choices that piss someone off, only to act like I'm an innocent victim when they get angry."

I'm really disappointed in the handling of Reese. As I've said before, even though I felt TB wasn't my favorite Carly (even though I'll take her over Laura Wright any day) on General Hospital, I know she has the ability to serve it up fierce! She hasn't been given that moment yet. I get that TB, as an actress, is trying to play different roles and not be "Carly" all the time. But they don't have to write Reese to be such a passive doormat, either. I wish Pratt & Co. took the time to delve further into the struggles of being freshly out. And, no... not play around with the whole "is she bi, is she lesbian?" thing. Having been out for ten years, I know there are plenty of tales to tell. They could've had Reese be out but still not be comfortable with showing affection toward Binks in public. Or, there could've been an issue surrounding Reese not being out at work and the drama between Breese could've come from that. So may other options, but they wasted their time. They sped crap up so they can get this DAYTIME'S FIRST LESBIAN WEDDING... which was only a backdrop for the all important-yet-disappointing Greenlee Dies story.

I dunno... I'm still holding out hope. Maybe once things get out of this awkward stage, it'll pick up again. We have May coming up, so... [crossing fingers!]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Out of the three idiots, Zach was definitely the one to cheer for yesterday, however that is not saying much.... I would just prefer for them all to fall in some hole somewhere and never ben heard from again. While I enjoy Erica and Ryan at odds (she finally has seen the light there), her blind loyalty to Zach just sort of negates it all.... she should be focusing on Kendall and her grandchildren aka Kendall's sons.

Pratt is still getting some things right though.... Opal's presence in everything is a big one..... while I think comparing Ray Gardener and David Hayward is just a tad bit much..... I love the reference to history there. Also the Amanda/Jake dynamic is still very strong and still continues to be my favourite storyline.... the only one really what I have an investment in currently. The spoilers for down the road as I and other's have said do look promising... it appears to be going to mix things up again which is one of the main reason's I fell in love with Pratt when he first came on board. Not afraid to go against the grain and do things that surprise and entertain me.... above all this soap needs to get that camp back that was the fall with Annie.... I am hoping one of the new recruits coming in provides that.

I still think Pratt is miles ahead of the past 5 years or so under The Writer and B&E.... but he needs to get something started again soon.... or he will prove to be just as tired as his predecessors.

As much of a plot point it was to get them airtime, I am glad the Hubbards got Little A for that very reason.... at least I get to see them.... I hope something more meaningful comes down the pike for them.

R, I totally agree with you about Reese..... they blew that big time, but I still respected what Tamara tried to accomplish what the writing couldn't. Reese was my main focus for really the last two months....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The last five or so episodes of season 8 after the Jean Hackney story ended were pretty strong with the Laura/Val friendship breakdown, Ben's PTSD with Val trying to help him, and the start of Jill realizing that Val was as much of a threat to her happiness with Gary as Abby was. I always thought that the Jean Hackney story should have ended at mid season at the latest... and then deal with the fall-out because seeing Ben/Val switch roles with Ben in mental decline instead of Val would have been interesting to explore.  And seeing Val and Laura's friendship suffer also was interesting and should have been explored especially with Karen caught in the middle and Abby both intrigued and amused at the conflict that she didn't cause. However, season 8 was the only Latham run season where Val was well written.  
    • Well, she's not in there sweeping the floors at the end of the night, and you don't bring in an award-winning producer to just sit on their backsides (or hey, maybe you do!). Again, without knowing the specific capacity she's in there working as⏤and it seems as if we are not going to at the present time⏤it's hard to speculate/discuss. I would interpret she's in a role that either would not require being credited, or she's, as others have speculated, is back and not receiving credit for the work she's done. That'd be like saying, per the WGA, all writers must be credited, but as we've seen by those who've worked as fi-core, they don't always receive credit. 

      Please register in order to view this content

       And, if my research is correct, per the DGA, you can request not to be credited for work you do. I could only assume the same would be for the PGA, as well.
    • When Anita read Barbara's letter, it started out with the viewers hearing it in Barbara's voice as Anita read silently. And then Anita saying the next portion aloud while Barbara's voice continued simultaneously. And then ending with Anita alone saying the last part aloud. Excerpt from interview  (link to full interview) The rest may be spoilerish -- Only the nonspoiler part here: I love the idea of reading that letter,” shares Tunie. “And at one point in the script, I think it said that my voice joined her, and [Anita] started reciting the letter from memory because [she] memorized this letter. I suggested to Steve Williford, our director, ‘What if it’s like that moment in Hamilton when Hamilton is writing the resignation letter to George Washington, and then he starts saying it too, and then Hamilton’s voice fades away, and then it’s all George. What if we do something like that?’ And he was like, ‘Oh, my God! I just got chills. Let’s do it!’ So, we did it.” I understood that it worked really well, so I’m really happy about that.”  
    • I think MVJ and Guza made a good team in the launching of the soap, and I'm hoping that the rotation of all stories and characters is maintained once he officially departs from the credits. And so far, Ron C's breakdowns have been decent... but they pop only when he's paired with a good script writer like Jazmin.   I hope once Guza leaves officially... that MVJ is able to reign in Ron C and the dread Jamey G.
    • I read that, but my interpretation was that she is uncredited because it is in a non-production capacity.  In others words, she's not secretly producing, or writing, as some had speculated prior to the confirmation. Her likeliest position would be in a post-production consultant capacity. I assume we agree on this?
    • Errol already confirmed she is back at Y&R and in a non-producing role; this alludes to she is not credited for the role she has.
    • I don't think Lisa served a purpose after the serial killer storyline. The writers never gave her anything to do but be Vicky's nemesis. Joanna Going deserved better. Another example of a character taking over the show and then the writers not having a longterm plan for the character.  Exhibit B: Sally Spencer. Such a missed opportunity. It really angers me how they misused her. She could sing and act and they just threw her away in that sexist nonsense storyline. Once the story was over, they wrote her off. The McKinnons should have lasted for years. I will give the show credit for how they introduced Sandra Ferguson as Amanda. I thought it was expertly done. She comes in and she immediately connected to RKK's Sam. She has chemistry with Matthew and she has realistic conversations with MAc and Rachel. That's how it is done. 
    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy