Jump to content

GL: February Discussion


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I wonder if Beth Ehlers and Ricky Paull have yet realized that the grass isn't always greener. They certaintly have not had much success at AMC. She's hardly ever on and he's just playing Gus, but a doctor this time.

They have not duplicated the success they had on GL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 211
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I don't feel bad for RPG at all. He wanted out, he got to play the core character he signed on for, and is now paying the karmic retribution from being such an arrogant self-promoting ass at the Emmys last year but as much as I came to hate Harley over the years, I really feel for Ehlers. She signed on to play a recast Liza Colby, a legacy character with ties to practically everybody, but within weeks of her signing Pratt was hired and he decided to create a new character for her instead. The problem was that the new character was one-dimensional, poorly fleshed out, and seemed to exist solely to fight with and end up in love with RPG's Jake, who'd barely been around for three months at that point and was nothing like any of the previous Jake's who'd come before him. He was basically Gus with a stethoscope and particularly popular.

Even more mindboggling is that Liza had a lot of history with Jake so if they wanted to put those two in scenes together immediately upon her arrival, letting her play Liza would've achieved that but instead they brought her on as a foil for Jake with no background, no history, and no Plan B in case Plan A failed, which it did. Most AMC fans didn't give two whits about GusH so they didn't care to have another show's couple in a front-burner story whose ending had already been pre-determined. It didn't help that the all of the PR surrounding BE's arrival had her attached to RPG and Taylor attached to Jake and them touting how undeniable and effortless their supposedly amazing chemistry was and people hate being told what and who to like.

The pairing tanked and both characters were shoved deep into the background. Jake is starting to reemerge and perhaps Taylor will soon but she's appeared a grand total of six times since January 1st and is now tied to another newbie character with no town connections but one who is so sympathetic that if Taylor drops him for Jake, Tad, or whomever, the audience will side with him not her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
    • That would have made sense. Did all these characters get dropped when DePriest left or had they already been dropped?
    • The other issue with Missy: in June 2020, she "liked" some social media posts by Candace Owens -- things Candace said that were against Black Lives Matter.  That is described here https://tvline.com/news/melissa-reeves-racism-days-of-our-lives-instagram-controversy-2894568/ I don't know if that was ever resolved.
    • She appeared onscreen not long after Rose Livingston and Sara Montaigne, and we found out that Sara was Rose's estranged daughter. I wonder whether Peggy might have been part of that family group -- or else they were just juggling a few different potential mysteries so that they could develop whatever seemed to be getting the best response from the audience. They didn't do anything much with Rose and Sara really either. Maybe Rose would have become more prominent if Rachel and Mac had split up over Mitch, or if Sara had really flourished. In some ways I can picture Cheryl being affected by MJ's prostitution similarly to how Josie was distressed by finding out about Sharlene. But I can also see that Josie as a Frame being involved with Matthew would have different stakes for Rachel and Sharlene than Cheryl being involved with Scott. I do think the solution for Cheryl would have had to be a badder boy than Scott -- either a real bad boy who would do her wrong, or the kind of bad boy (not Chad!!!) who is essentially misunderstood and other people just don't understand. Cheryl would also have been better off with some friends her own age. Matthew and Josie benefited a bit from having other teenagers to interact with.
    • Sally Spencer was a decent actress, but the writing destroyed the "M.J." that Kathleen Layman had built. Layman had a quiet strength about her, and she and Osburn really felt like sisters. Spencer's character should have been either an unmentioned sister, or maybe Jake's that grew up close to Kathleen, M.J. and the rest, but was away for a few years before joining the force. Kristen Marie was o.k., but I always got a mousier vibe from her. Being pigeon-holed with Scott for most of the run hurt things for her, as well.  The Loves were also underserved between Rhonda Lewin and Philece Sampler. Philece would have been better as Nicole. Thank goodness Anne Heche  showed up for the next round of auditions. Christopher Holder was mediocre as Peter, but given a shot, I think Marcus Smythe could have stuck around for a while.  I would have had Peggy Lazarus be a Frame -- possibly an ex-wife for Vince with an agenda. Smythe and Hollen had  a fun chemistry that could have kept the two around.. Bringing recasts for  Cheryl and Ben back mixing it up with other Frames. Corys, Lawrences at the time might have kept all the families stronger. 
    • shoot...he said in that Locher room with Krista. I think he met her before that---she was doing Broadway and they had mutual friends or an agent maybe?
    • Yes. And I assume he met Mary Ellen Stuart at GL.
    • That's an odd coincidence. Yeah, Roger would turn anything he could to his advantage. At the time, he's just taking the pictures to bank leverage over Reva, Billy or the Lewises.  I'm kinda squeamish about 1986 episodes myself. I'd love to hear the original version of Ross/Vanessa/Dinah, but the Cain story is bad, and I don't want Billy and Vanessa to break up.
    • Eeek. I didn't know this either! I will say, though, even though they skimmed over a lot of Roger's past, I will give them props for not trying to turn him into a hero. Yeah, I was hoping we would get more 1986 episodes than were available on YT before, but now I'm wondering if I really want to see that. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy