Jump to content

AMC/OLTL/GH: ROBIN CHRISTOPHER, true queen of ABC Daytime!


MarlandRulez

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

Bumping for Robin...She's returning in September, right?

I posted this in the TQ thread, but those interested in seeing Skye as Tracy's daughter should read this. RC and JE work so well together. I'd love to see something like that play out.

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • 1 month later...
  • Members
Posted

why, i thought you were over this :rolleyes: Take your own advice, if you intend to troll, vent about me in the Tracy Q thread but id hate for her fans to come down on you too for taking up space.

  • Members
Posted

So how's it feel to have your lovefest infested with people that hate your character?

Now you know how we feel...dealing with garbage like this from you.

You're just lucky I'm more respectful than you and that I'm not posting how I really feel about RC/Skye.

How's it feel? Dealing with garbage like this? Cause I haven't even bashed her yet and I bet you're getting annoyed.

You know...we tried respectfully asking you to stop.

We tried reporting you...we tried ignoring you...and yet maybe because you're lonely in here in this thread...you just decide to bug us?

Well let me tell you...I don't have one single kind thing to say about RC/SKye.

And since rudeness is the only language you seem to respond to...I'd be more than happy and come in here and tell the world five six twenty times a day..how I really feel about RC.

WOuld you like that?

I doubt it. Not after you read what I had to say.

So let's make a deal.

You stay out of the TQ fest and I'll stay out of here.

Cause they're obviously not banning you for what YOU say and do...and I doubt they'll ban me either.

So keep it up.

Keep coming in the TQ fest and being a pain...and I'll make it a habit to come in here several times a day discussing RC's "acting."

It's your choice.

What do you love more? RC? Or antagonizing people who up until now were minding their own business?

It's your choice.

Have a nice day.

  • Members
Posted

So I take it that means we have a deal?

GOOD.

Cause I really don't want to expend my energy bothering talking about her "acting" any more than you want to read it.

IF we don't have a deal?

Say so now.

  • Members
Posted

Oh Goody !

That means we have a deal.

I'm so glad.

Have a NICE day. :)

And BTW...just as a reminder...if you come into the TQ thread and be nasty like you have been....all bets are totally off.

If you think I'm even REMOTELY joking? Test me.

CAuse it won't bother me the slightest little bit to come in here and write an essay on RC and her "acting."

Thanks for being such a nice, understanding, respectful poster in the future.

And once again...have a NICE day.

  • Members
Posted

You know I can't tell if you like the attention..after all this thread hasn't seen this much action in....well,EVER.

WOnder why? :)

But I'm done here.

Like I said...if you have something nice to say about Jane or Tracy or to or about the posters in that thread...come on in.

The water's fine?

But you come in spewing your venom about ANY of the posters or Jane or Tracy or ANY of her scenes or pairings or ANYTHING negative?

NOTHING you say about Jane will even TOUCH what I can say about RC/Skye.

I mean I will put your horrible rude comments in that thread to SHAME.

I will NOT HOLD BACK about RC/SKYE.

So....like I said. Your choice.

We can co-exist on the same boad in peace. Or not.

Entirely up to you.

  • Members
Posted

Hmm..

"nasty Piece of work"??

You see Marland....after all I said.....I never once called you names.

I have been ....and I will continue...to keep my comments to the CHARACTERS or actors.

I don't personally call other poster's names...calling them pathetic or nasty pieces of work.....

And I'm sure somewhere in the rules of this board there's a rule against that.

I guess I'll have to email EVERY mod to find out.

And that's the difference between you and well...every other poster in most of the threads on this board.

We insult characters...but not each other.

And bTW...it's not like the TQ lovers dont' know how much I HATE LOATHE AND ABHOR Skye Chandler.

It's not like they can't see from lurking that I posted here.

It's not like they can't read what I posted.

So whatever you're trying to accomplish by ONCE AGAIN coming into the TQ thread to start crap?

Failed...because I'm right here..not hiding.

The difference is...you have NO respect for other members.

How sad.

*shakes head*

  • Members
Posted

I'm not looking for a fight.

I'm looking for peace.

I want to be able to come in to the TQ thread without reading posts from you calling other members names.

I want to be able to come into the TQ thread without you being insulting to JE/TQ or her scenes or her pairings.

I want to be able to come into the TQ thread without hearing how RC/Skye is superior to JE/Tracy.

Because all of the above? Does not belong in the TQ thread.

Now if you want to come in the TQ thread and be positive about all of the above, and be respectful?

Good.

If you don't...that's fine too. But ya know....the more I think about it...I don't think I'll bother responding in this thread anymore no matter what you do.

It's your choice. You can choose to be respectful of other people or not.

I don't really care because if there's not a rule against a poster who goes out of their way to call others names and the mods won't do anything about it? I'm not sure I even want to post here anymore.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • Vernon is an idiot. Why would he have Sharon in the same hotel that Leslie is staying at?
    • Yes, that out of the blue return was odd. Maybe GG found a forgotten clause in the contract he signed when he was wooed to ABC and they were forced to take him back! Like George Reinholt he talked about the contract that promised him primetime roles. But it was loaded in the networks favor. I think it was Gloria Loring that re-signed at Days on the promise of primetime opportunities, but that was all it was- she was put up for guest spots and TV movies but not necessarily guaranteed that she get the role.
    • I still am baffled by why Monty brought back stunt hire Gerald Gordon in the early '80s out of nowhere for like a year. I haven't found anyone who can come up with a thing he did in that second stint of note.
    • It's interesting to watch this having watched The Doctors. I'm not sure I'm seeing that much of a difference in the characters Gerald Gordon and Anna Stuart played on The Doctors and what they're playing here.
    • I keep forgetting a huge chunk of that year was written by scabs. You're probably right, because by the time the strike was over, they were likely planning an exit for Alan's character as it must have been obvious by then that Bernau was not going to return. If he was still there, it's also doubtful they would have approached MZ and MG about coming back. Wild.
    • And to think the original plan was for David and Lesley to have an affair.  Not only would that have made no sense - Lesley wasn't THAT stupid, lol - but it also would've ruined her and GH.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Week ending March 5 1978 Second season shows are tested CBS finishes first week in March with stronger than usual 1 9.5, but not enough to beat ABC The prime -time ratings pattern continued to hold steady for the week ended March 5, and attention increasingly turns to second season entries as the networks probe one another's weaknesses or cover their own. As usual, ABC -TV won the week, scoring a 20.5 average rating. But CBS -TV was closer than usual with a 19.5 average garnered with the help of several strong specials and movies in addition to some of its dependable series regulars. NBC followed its habit of plummeting when its "évent "entries failed. In this case it was the miniseries, Loose Change, which scored only 24 and 22 shares on Monday and Tuesday, leaving the network with a 16.9 average rating for the week. Looking at new series and new time slots, ABC's Six Million Dollar Man on Monday (8 -9 p.m. NYT) continued to falter with a 22 share, while What's Happening, in its new slot on Saturday (8 -9 p.m.), also remained shaky with a 23 share. Starsky and Hutch is still healthy with a 38 share in its new slot following Charlie's Angels on Wednesday, and How the West Was Won also had a 38 on Sunday (8 -9 p.m.). Against West CBS's Rhoda and On Our Own came in poorly for the second week in a row of face to face competition, with each pulling 25 shares after a 41 share lead in from 60 Minutes. ABC's special two -hour presentation of the upcoming series tryout, Having Babies, scored a 27 share on Friday (9 -11 p.m.) against strong competition from both the other networks (the movie "Ski Lift to Death" on CBS and Rockford Files and Quincy on NBC). For CBS, its new Monday night leadoffs, Good Times and Baby I'm Back, scored so -so 27 and 28 shares respectively. But the second half of the night had its best performance since the new line -up came in- M *A*S *Hwith a 45, One Day at a Time with a 41 and Lou Grant with a 36. Celebrity Challenge of the Sexes and Shields and Yarnell showed no signs of reviving on Tuesday, with 16 shares each, but the new Tuesday movie slot held up with a 41 share from Clint Eastwood's "Magnum Force." The network's entire Saturday line up continued to limp in, as Bob Newhart Tony Randall, The Jeffersons, Maude and Kojak all scored sub 30 shares (with the exception of Newhart's 29, in fact, all scored sub -25 shares). NBC premiered its new Chuck Barris Rah Rah Show on Tuesday (8 -9 p.m.),when it pulled a 24 share. The second episode of Quark had a 27, three points down from its premiere. There might be the temptation to conclude that the 29 share turned in by the National Love, Sex and Marriage Test on Sunday (9:30 -10 p.m.) proves the appetite for "sophisticated" subject matter is not insatiable after all, except that its competition was not only CBS's strong comedy block but also ABC's rerun of "The Way We Were," which pulled a 35 share. Of NBC's other midseason entries -CPO Sharkey, Black Sheep Squadron, James at 16 and Class of '65 -CPO Sharkey turned in the highest score of the week, a 27.   *NBC were in dire straits at this point relying on movies and specials which could hit or bomb in equal measure.  Fred Silverman had his work cut out for him when he arrived that Summer. He favored sitcoms and series as the schedule's foundation and NBC had no sitcoms to build on and few solid series. He also had a big backlog of specials/mini series that had been committed to air. Also NBC had a long standing relationship with Universal so he was forced to work with that studio. He struggled to get quality producers on board as they were either tied into deals with ABC/CBS or were wary of having their shows on the 3rd rated network. He still felt variety had a place on the schedule however and that lead to duds like Susan Anton, The Big Show and Pink Lady and Jeff.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I spent years hoping we would get an oral history like the OLTL book, but it’s too late now with so many having passed away.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy