Jump to content

Barack Obama Elected President!


Max

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I'm not Ryan but if you're saying that she did sign a document that refuses to count MI and FL then she shouldn't try to count them should she? Doesn't that show her mission to now have them counted is self serving.

It wasn't John Edwards but that's beside the point.

You're arguing that she should get all the delegates in FL and MI yet you have yet to declare that they are winner take all primaries, so you have no basis other than that you want her to get all the delegates because you want her to win.

I'm just going to add that for me to continue to debate over MI is moot since not only were they in violation of the rules but they also didn't offer any options for voters who wanted to select a candidate other than HC (if that candidate's name was not on the ballot). There is no way that voting uncommitted signifies a vote for HC when her name was an option. And there is no way that she should be designated all of those uncommitted delegates when they clearly did not vote for her whether it be in full or at fifty percent.

I've repeated myself more than once as to the names on the FL/MI ballots and this whole thing is cyclical and enough to cause not just a headache but a migraine. The seating intent will be revealed on Saturday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Thank you.

The talking in circles will go on because when someone chooses to ignore any response that puts a dent in his/her premise and continues to set forth the same premise then you get the never ending cycle of A A A A A even though B nullifies the basis for A.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This just in.

And.....this should stop some of the seating BS I keep hearing get repeated.

Democrats Advised to Seat Half of Disputed Delegates

Sign In to E-Mail or Save This Print Reprints Share

DiggFacebookMixxYahoo! BuzzPermalink

By KATHARINE Q. SEELYE

Published: May 29, 2008

Democratic Party lawyers have determined that no more than half the delegates from Florida and Michigan can be seated at the party’s August convention, dealing a blow to Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton’s efforts to seat the full delegations from those states.

Election GuideMore Politics NewsThe rules committee of the Democratic National Committee meets on Saturday to determine whether to seat the delegates from these states, which were penalized for holding early primaries.

In asking that the full delegations from these states be seated, Mrs. Clinton hopes to narrow Senator Barack Obama’s delegate edge and make the case that by including the votes from these states, she will have more of the popular vote in the nominating contests, an assertion that has come under some dispute. But the party’s legal analysis, contained in a 38-page memo to the committee, says the committee can either seat only 50 percent of the delegates or seat them all but give them only half a vote, which amounts to the same thing.

Whatever the committee decides about the delegates may not be a big factor in Mrs. Clinton’s pursuit of the nomination. Even if she were awarded all the delegates in proportion to her popular vote in those states — her best-case scenario — she could not overtake Senator Obama’s delegate lead.

It is not entirely clear what the Obama campaign intends to ask for at the meeting but Mr. Obama has said he wants the delegates seated. His top aide, David Axelrod, has said that the campaign could go “half-way” on any compromise.

The important goal for the Clinton campaign is to include the popular votes from those two disputed states in its overall vote tally. The Clinton campaign is already doing this, but because Michigan and Florida have been stripped of their delegates, an air of illegitimacy hangs over their votes and her opponents do not recognize their popular vote.

If the rules committee seats even half the delegates from those states, that could confer some legitimacy on the Clinton’s inclusion of those votes in their overall tally, although a Clinton aide said that the campaign does not feel it needs the seating of the delegates to legitimize the popular vote. Those votes have been counted and certified by the secretaries of state in both states, the aide said, and the rules committee cannot alter that.

The rules committee’s meeting is important because it needs to address the decisions by Michigan and Florida to move up their primaries in violation of party rules. The committee stripped the states of their delegates as punishment for doing so. If it restores the delegates, even at half strength, it may send a message to other states that next time they can violate the calendar without serious consequences, in effect a license for chaos.

So the committee is in a box in trying to figure out how to respect the voters in Florida and Michigan, who were not responsible for this potential disenfranchisement, while still honoring voters in 48 other states where officials followed the rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

All of this could have been avoided if:

1) MI and FL had moved their primaries back to their original dates

2) Hillary hadn't gone against her pledge to not campaign in MI or FL and not try to change the rules just because she's down.

The issue at hand should be with the leaders in MI and FL. Not the entire DNC. The DNC did what it had to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Another piece on information.

From CNN:

Poll of Polls: Obama, Clinton both leading McCain

Posted: 02:30 PM ET

(CNN)–The CNN general election national poll of polls now shows both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton leading John McCain McCain by two points: 46 percent to 44 percent.

The last general election poll of polls — released May 15 — showed Obama leading McCain by five points (48 percent to 43 percent) and Clinton leading McCain by four points (48 percent to 44 percent).

NATIONAL GENERAL ELECTION POLL OF POLLS*

May 15-27

Voters’ Choice for President

Obama: 46 percent

McCain: 44 percent

Unsure: 10 percent

*The national general election “poll of polls” consists of three surveys: Gallup (May 22-25/27), Newsweek (May 21-22), and Reuters/Zogby (May 15-18). The poll of polls does not have a sampling error.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You know.....since Obama is leading McCain in that poll, he should DEFINITELY be President....seeing as how that was the argument a few months ago when Hillary had overtaken Barrack in the polls.

But wait, who am I kidding. Barrack needs to step aside and let Hillary be POTUS because she is the one who can take us to the White House in November. I must remember that. Hillary as POTUS, Barrack as VPOTUS.

*smacks head*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I tired to make this point a while back so I naturally agree. All those officials are doing is looking for someone to fix their mistake and also trying to shirk responsibility by shifting blame. If they can stir the pot then the people will forget who disenfranchised them in the first place.

What are you even thinking? :lol::lol:

Only when second place is the new first place. :D:D:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thank you, Wales.

I forgot that. So, by that logic......

Al Gore DID beat GWB in 2000.

And.......the Rams beat the Pats in SB36.

And........

Luke Skywalker, in blowing up the Death Star......really won the war between the Empire and the Rebels.

I see, I see.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Don't tell fans of the NYG that the Giants didn't really win the SB this year.

I can't wait for coverage of that non event on Saturday. Hmmmm so the lawyers said 50 percent and the media is going to pretend as long as it lasts that something else is going to happen as they analyze it to death.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Lord.

Clinton Backers Plan Rules and Bylaws Protest

By Garance Franke-Ruta

The cracks in the divided Democratic Party just got a little deeper.

A group of high-profile Hillary Clinton supporters, Democratic fundraisers and Florida Democrats is planning to hold a day-long rally Saturday outside the Washington hotel where the Democratic National Committee's Rules and Bylaws Committee Meeting will be considering the fate of votes cast in the Michigan and Florida primaries to call attention to what they say is the exclusion of women's voices from the democratic -- and Democratic -- process and the disenfranchisement of Michigan and Florida voters.

"Our purpose is not to divide the party or attack the DNC or Senator Obama," said the Hillary Rapid Responders, one of the rally planners, in an online announcement of it. "At the same time, Hillary's strong support cannot be dismissed in DNC efforts to unify the party."

The rally is perhaps a more unusual intra-party affair than such words suggest, pitting powerful Democratic women against a party for which they have done much.

The event is being co-organized by the Women Count PAC -- founded by five top Clinton supporters, including longtime Clinton friend and fundraiser Susie Tompkins Buell and Stacy Mason, a former editor of Roll Call - -and a coalition of disparate other groups working under the umbrella of the New York-based group Count Every Vote '08. It will draw together some of Clinton's most loyal backers and be emceed by Jehmu Greene, the former president of Rock the Vote who sat on the DNC committee that spent 2005 trying to reform the party's primary process.

Announced speakers so far include National Organization for Women President Kim Gandy and Florida Democratic congresswoman Corinne Brown. Organizers say that they expect individuals to come in from 26 different states for the rally, as well as some major celebrity speakers, and that they are receiving logistical assistance or other support from the pro-Clinton United Federation of Teachers and EMILY's List. The group Florida Demands Representation, organized by James Hannagan, will also be there.

The rally was the brainchild of a young Clinton fundraiser and New York attorney who is a member of Count Every Vote '08, according to the group's spokeswoman Karen Feldman, a political consultant from Hudson, N.Y., who specializes in female candidates. Count Every Vote '08 first came together in mid-March to lobby Democratic superdelegates on behalf of Clinton. "When we started we were a group of women primarily supporting Hillary Clinton," said Feldman of the initial team, which also included legendary N.Y. Clinton fundraisers Ricki Lieberman, Pamela Hayes, and Barbara Layton, as well as Allida Black, the project director and editor of The Eleanor Roosevelt papers at George Washington University who has known Clinton for years through human rights circles.

Black also joined together with Tompkins Buell to start Women Count PAC two weeks ago, along with Clinton fundraiser and Silicon Valley executive Amy Rao, former Roll Call editor Mason and corporate communications specialist Rosemary Camposano. The group raised more than $250,000 in four days, Camposano told The Trail, and used that money to buy ads in the New York Times, USA Today and four newspapers in Kentucky and Oregon.

In response to the ads, "we started getting e-mails and phone calls -- just thousands and thousands of women saying, 'How we can stand up?' 'How can we help?'" says Camposano. "We've been hearing from women who feel like women, as group, we are 51 percent of the country and we don't have a voice when getting heard in the media. ... We're hearing from the women who feel completely outraged about being ignored in this process and being marginalized."

The latest ad, which ran in the Times over the weekend, called on women readers to attend the May 31 rally.

This.....

Bull.

[!@#$%^&*].

WASHINGTON – Hillary Clinton’s campaign today rejected suggestions that the Democratic Party’s Rules and Bylaws Committee might only be authorized to seat half of the disallowed delegates from Michigan and Florida.

The Associated Press first reported last night on a memo from party lawyers in advance of Saturday’s meeting of the committee to discuss seating of the delegations. In it, an analysis says a strong argument can be made that party rules automatically require a state to lose half its delegation if it violates bylaws for scheduling a primary and the Rules Committee can’t do anything about it.

The Rules Committee earlier stripped both states of all of their delegates for scheduling early primaries. Now, with the party’s presidential nomination still undecided, Saturday’s meeting has been called to determine if there’s a way to bring them back into the fold and avoid a nasty floor fight at the convention.

Clinton’s campaign wants the delegates apportioned just as she won them in both primaries, which would help her argument of electability to superdelegates – or so she and her advisers hope. She would take an edge in the popular vote if those states counted – as long as caucus voters nationally were not counted and the uncommitted vote in Michigan, where front-runner Barack Obama’s name did not appear on the ballot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • You are going to be so proud of me because I agree.  I kept thinking why is Sonny/Mo getting all the dialogue and gate keeping everyone's feelings when there are 3 other capable actors in these scenes?  Ned should have told Sonny to shut up lol. I am fine with Sonny getting a reaction, but he got 90% of the airtime for his reaction.  I don't even think it's mental health that's keeping his job.  MB wouldn't get this much time on screen if it was a pity thing.  Frank is too afraid to cut Sonny because of fan reaction.  I know there aren't any Sonny fans here, but I do think there are Sonny fans out there (besides me) lol.
    • I've been looking at the ratings during and after each head writer switch.  The ratings during Marcus' tenure (Oct 74 to April 75) were very good but at first not quite as high a Upton's (who was there six months prior. Marcus left when Mary Hartman was picked up as she was a creator and head writer). I've watched Marcus' interviews on Youtube; she discusses most of the soaps she worked on. She liked the money; she's not all warm and fuzzy about writing for them. She loved nighttime genres that gave her writing more flexibility than soapy dramas. But she was good at writing soaps.  By April 75, SFT was no.2 in the ratings behind ATWT. O'Shea was next (lasted 18 months) and in May 75, SFT high No. 1. When O'Shea left the show as still in the top five. O'Shea moved to OLTL in 77? but not as head writer so not sure why she left SFT. The Corringtons were the safest bet to keep long term. They needed to change direction by 1980 as the ratings were  dropping but still very solid 6s/low 20s share). They should have expanded the show to an hour and given the Corringtons some direction and more budget. One has to wonder about two people who were with the show for a long time: Mary Ellis Bunim was promoted to EP when she was about 28, amazingly and a woman! She as talented but she went through at 11 head writer changes if she started in 1974.  Here's her list of writers: Theodore Apstein (January 1974 – May 1974) 5 mo Gabrielle Upton (May 1974 – November 1974) 6 mo Ann Marcus (October 1974 - April 1975) 6 mo Peggy O’Shea (April 1975 – November 1976) 18 mo Irving Elman (with James Lipton) (November 1976 – Summer 1977) 9 mo Robert J. Shaw with Charles/Patti Dizenzo (August 1977 - Spring 78) 6-9 mo? Henry Slesar (Spring 78 to August 78) 3-4 mo? Corringtons (August 1978 to May 1980) 1 yr/9mo Linda Grover/John Porterfield (May 1980 to mid July 1980) 3 mo. Gabrielle Upton (July 1980 to at least through March or April) Harding Lemay April to June 81 writers' strike Don Chastain (Summer 1981 writers' strike - replaced by Ellis/Hunt Dec 81 or Jan 82) Then Fred Bartholemew comes in when Bunim goes to ATWT (Oct 81?) and he brings in Ellis Hunt for the NBC switchover, they lasted 11 months. Mary Stuart is the other mystery to me: how was she to work with? Did she instigate many of the writer firings? Was she not involved at all. No other P&G show went through this kind of frenetic change. (The Doctors might be a close second but wasn't on as long and not P&G).
    • I'm getting the sense that something happened between Anita and Dante Green that wasn’t exactly copacetic, to say the least. I wonder — did he promise her fame and fortune as a solo artist, and then attack her when she rebuffed his advances? I hope it’s not a long-lost child plot lurking out there for her. Maybe she left behind an sibling in poverty or something instead, back in Cabrini-Green/Chicago. It does seem like neither Tracy nor Sharon’s solo careers turned out the way they dreamed — both ended up singing at City Wineries. I still think Leslie is connected to the Duprees — maybe her mother is Sharon, and she's going after the Duprees because she believes she could’ve had their lifestyle if things had gone differently for her mom. She does have ties to Chicago. That said, I hope this is the last disguise from her toolbox for a while — I’d hate for that to get played out. But I do wonder if she’s going to use Nicole 2.0 to frame Nicole for something down the line? I’m all for giving Shanice more time on canvas, and I wouldn’t hate it if she and Andre became an item — someone who doesn’t mind being public, unlike Dani. Or I can see Doug finally getting fed up with their arrangement and turning to the nurse for some “relief.” Vanessa was, in a way, telling herself off in those scenes with Ted about his cheating. And I have to say, Keith Robinson’s Ted brings a broader range of emotion than Maurice Johnson’s did — though I think Ted 2.0 is benefitting from better writing than OG Ted, whose arc relied more on MJ’s charisma and physical presence. That said, as someone else pointed out, Keith looks like he’s drowning in the clothes they’ve got him in. Hopefully, they’ve got some better-fitted attire lined up now.
    • They are just right there in your face.  It's hard to not see Ciara's boobs at all times.  And simmer down camera man, this is a family show!! The high school stuff makes it weird.  Physically the actors all look fine together.  It just makes me think Doug needs to find friends his own age.   With Ari at least Doug was under the impression she was over 21. I liked JJ and Eve too lol!
    • Specifically that's Kat & she is, there's no other way to say it except like pulling off a band-aid. She's Chad's "#1 fan" IOW, basically, kinda sorta she's an albatross around Chad's neck.  Kat can turn any conversation into a discussion of Chad & what he ate for breakfast or the most minute of minute things about Chad Duell's life & times.  We hope she's not dangerous. We hope she's just boring. That Chad is not back has lit a fire under her. She's upped her number of posts, which all relate in some way to Chad. Now you know what there is to know about as I said Chad Duell's #1 fan.     
    • The Duh-prees - Count me in as someone who cannot stand Kat’s fashion. No one walks around town dressed like that. And those wigs? Completely immovable. We have incredible wig technology these days—can’t the show find something better? - Vernon’s sermons are total FF material. - It looks like they’re setting up a past drinking habit for Anita (with all the “drowning” references), and maybe even a rape/child plot? Also—remember when Dani was an alcoholic? Lol.   Ted / Nicole / Leslie - Some people are projecting way too much onto OG Ted. Sure, he had screen presence, but his line delivery was pure caricature. He wasn’t menacing or threatening—he was a joke. NuTed may be meek, a bit one-note, and smaller in stature, but his confrontation with Leslie on Friday worked. Also, let’s be real—Bill’s not scary either. Total softie. Couldn’t scare a fly. - The ATWT reference was cute, but wasn’t the Duncan storyline from the ‘80s? Are we supposed to believe Nicole was already practicing back then? Since she said it was her patients who watched… like others pointed out, God forbid she watched herself! - Also: I stand corrected on Leslie. I think she’s starting to make more sense as a character. She’s fearless and provocative—that’s what drives her. I actually loved her mirror scene where Nicole 2.0 made her debut.   The non-Dupree characters - You guys were a bit dramatic about Monday’s show. It just had too many unlikeable storylines crammed into one. That’s all. Also, I stand by what I said about Derek and Ashley—their storyline is totally rom-com coded, and I’m into it. - I’ve developed a soft spot for Doug!!

      Please register in order to view this content

      And I thought that Vanessa ripping into Ted had a subtle layer of self-reprimand to it   - I officially can’t stand André. I don’t buy him as a playboy at all. Same goes for Pamela with her transatlantic accent. It’s such a shame that this is the first character CML had to create… and this is what we got?
    • party pics and vids from Don Diamont's wife Cindy Ambuehl https://www.instagram.com/p/DJ9X--uxnF2/
    • You’re really starting to see panic in the other actors’ eyes as they watch him struggle to get through his lines. There is a shot in yesterday’s episode in which  Swickard is standing behind Mo while he drones on and on, and the younger actor is clearly doing everything he can to hide his “WTF” face.
    • Don posted May 12th for 16th anniv of his B&B debut, and Michele Val Jean replied on May 21st: https://www.instagram.com/p/DJknIr8y4ra/

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I just saw this & I liked it. Maybe you will like it too. You do not have to attend every argument you are invited to. It seems to me to be a suitable adage for today's internet.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy