Jump to content

Barack Obama Elected President!


Max

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 8.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

You're taking a big leap.....not even a jump to this conclusion.

I watch a couple of cable political shows here and there that are liberal but that doesn't mean they don't point out problems with the Democrats at times....anyway, it's besides the point since I don't really consider that news.....even though the actual news isn't much in the way of news.

I listen to newsradio every morning for the amount of time they claim it takes to bring me the world....though I don't think they've ever delivered on that claim. If there is a real bias on that station....it's conservative as they are always making Obama responsible for anything and everything. If there is a conclusion to leap or jump to......it might be that they don't have a problem with the other candidates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The thing about media and super analysts is they think they know what the average person is thinking and they keep assuming that people care about the things they say people do. Since the media with all its negativity tends to tap into the cynical side of viewers then I think it's more likely that people will look at McCain's effort to stall the debate as his trying to avoid it instead of as any great exercise of concern for the economy.....he said it was fundamentally sound several days ago.....but even if people missed that they do know that the situation didn't just arise today so what was he doing about it all week?

And I'll add this as well.....even though we may have given it some thought and concluded that both parties contribute to the mess.....McCain can't really tap dance away from it by claiming to be a reformer coming to save the day. Those low information voters to which the media refers at times are basic enough to associate the problems of the day with whoever is currently in office. It may not be Bush's fault or the Republican's fault but if half the people in the nation were asked....who do you think they'd blame it on?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No [!@#$%^&*]? George F. Will??? Are the Republicans defecting from their ticket? McCain has had problems attracting them since Day One and even after his pathetic attempt to get them back by selecting SP, they still aren't drinking the kool-aid. Well, most of them aren't anyway...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Should I be hurt that you don't read my posts because I posted this article yesterday morning? :D

Casey even responded and said something to the effect of thinking that McCain's temper would make him a good president. He listed presidents in support of his argument.

Now what I didn't say then was that all of them were no longer president when they were McCain's age. I don't mind taking heat on this but I won't say you can't teach an old dog new tricks since I have known some very sharp seniors.....including a 93 year old giving the occasional guitar lesson. I tend to think as a person gets older certain qualities magnify. One who is sharp and well read tends, to me, to try to maintain that.

I don't think I've ever looked at McCain and thought that he was a brilliant man and would make a fine president at any point since I first saw him.....and age hasn't made him more impressive at all to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Okay so it's not just Roman....it's you too.....maybe it's everybody. :mellow:

George Will might be over whatever ails him by the weekend.....I guess he was unhappy with McCain last weekend and it kind of carried over. Prior to that he didn't have much of an issue. All McCain has to do is drop a sugar cube in that glass and George will be singing the maverick song again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The impression that I am getting is that McCain wants to focus on this historical issue and come to a resolution..

I dont think he said he wants to avoid or cancel the debate, just delay it. But Obama doesn't want to come together in a bi-partisan effort by suspending the campaign and debates...he wants to continue the partisan bickering..

Obama has avoided all of McCain's invites to participate in town hall style debates. Do you feel he was right in this?

BTW, Do you all know what the debate topic is for Friday? It's foreign policy!...why would Obama feel this is something that is front and center on American's minds right now..?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

*Roman whispers*

It was OBAMA who called McCain this morning and said they should issue a joint statement of bi-partisanship. It was AFTER that call that McCain suspended his campaign.

And, I'll ask again......if he's such a damn pro on FP, why does he want to cancel this debate? Can he not do two things at once? Aren't you also one of those who said neither Obama or McCain could do anything themselves about this crisis?

Guess you changed your tune once again, Casey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

McCain is running scared. He's afraid of debating Sen. Barack Obama and the GOP and McCain and Palin are very,very scared to have Joe Biden and Sarah Palin debate. Old man McCain wants to move Friday night's debate to Thursday 10/2 when the Biden/Palin debate is scheduled and move that debate to a later date. This just smacks of desperation. McCain is a loser for even asking for this. The Obama/Biden campaign should remain FIRM and state no postponement of EITHER debate. If McCain is too scared to show up for Friday night's debate then Obama can have the night for himself!!!

Also as far as the McCain/Palin campaign kicking out the press during their trip to meet foreign leaders, etc. That smacks of pure communism! Communists do NOT believe in freedom of speech or freedom of the press, but in the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BOTH are GUARANTEED in the CONSTITUTION!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I posted it yesterday morning and since this may be the only issue on which I can win on this board as the deck is stacked against me....looky here:

http://boards.soapoperanetwork.com/index.p...mp;#entry648878

Anyway I know that people probably miss a lot of posts since I have missed responding to quite a number of ones that I saw but then couldn't find when I went back....and I give up pretty easily. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • You are going to be so proud of me because I agree.  I kept thinking why is Sonny/Mo getting all the dialogue and gate keeping everyone's feelings when there are 3 other capable actors in these scenes?  Ned should have told Sonny to shut up lol. I am fine with Sonny getting a reaction, but he got 90% of the airtime for his reaction.  I don't even think it's mental health that's keeping his job.  MB wouldn't get this much time on screen if it was a pity thing.  Frank is too afraid to cut Sonny because of fan reaction.  I know there aren't any Sonny fans here, but I do think there are Sonny fans out there (besides me) lol.
    • I've been looking at the ratings during and after each head writer switch.  The ratings during Marcus' tenure (Oct 74 to April 75) were very good but at first not quite as high a Upton's (who was there six months prior. Marcus left when Mary Hartman was picked up as she was a creator and head writer). I've watched Marcus' interviews on Youtube; she discusses most of the soaps she worked on. She liked the money; she's not all warm and fuzzy about writing for them. She loved nighttime genres that gave her writing more flexibility than soapy dramas. But she was good at writing soaps.  By April 75, SFT was no.2 in the ratings behind ATWT. O'Shea was next (lasted 18 months) and in May 75, SFT high No. 1. When O'Shea left the show as still in the top five. O'Shea moved to OLTL in 77? but not as head writer so not sure why she left SFT. The Corringtons were the safest bet to keep long term. They needed to change direction by 1980 as the ratings were  dropping but still very solid 6s/low 20s share). They should have expanded the show to an hour and given the Corringtons some direction and more budget. One has to wonder about two people who were with the show for a long time: Mary Ellis Bunim was promoted to EP when she was about 28, amazingly and a woman! She as talented but she went through at 11 head writer changes if she started in 1974.  Here's her list of writers: Theodore Apstein (January 1974 – May 1974) 5 mo Gabrielle Upton (May 1974 – November 1974) 6 mo Ann Marcus (October 1974 - April 1975) 6 mo Peggy O’Shea (April 1975 – November 1976) 18 mo Irving Elman (with James Lipton) (November 1976 – Summer 1977) 9 mo Robert J. Shaw with Charles/Patti Dizenzo (August 1977 - Spring 78) 6-9 mo? Henry Slesar (Spring 78 to August 78) 3-4 mo? Corringtons (August 1978 to May 1980) 1 yr/9mo Linda Grover/John Porterfield (May 1980 to mid July 1980) 3 mo. Gabrielle Upton (July 1980 to at least through March or April) Harding Lemay April to June 81 writers' strike Don Chastain (Summer 1981 writers' strike - replaced by Ellis/Hunt Dec 81 or Jan 82) Then Fred Bartholemew comes in when Bunim goes to ATWT (Oct 81?) and he brings in Ellis Hunt for the NBC switchover, they lasted 11 months. Mary Stuart is the other mystery to me: how was she to work with? Did she instigate many of the writer firings? Was she not involved at all. No other P&G show went through this kind of frenetic change. (The Doctors might be a close second but wasn't on as long and not P&G).
    • I'm getting the sense that something happened between Anita and Dante Green that wasn’t exactly copacetic, to say the least. I wonder — did he promise her fame and fortune as a solo artist, and then attack her when she rebuffed his advances? I hope it’s not a long-lost child plot lurking out there for her. Maybe she left behind an sibling in poverty or something instead, back in Cabrini-Green/Chicago. It does seem like neither Tracy nor Sharon’s solo careers turned out the way they dreamed — both ended up singing at City Wineries. I still think Leslie is connected to the Duprees — maybe her mother is Sharon, and she's going after the Duprees because she believes she could’ve had their lifestyle if things had gone differently for her mom. She does have ties to Chicago. That said, I hope this is the last disguise from her toolbox for a while — I’d hate for that to get played out. But I do wonder if she’s going to use Nicole 2.0 to frame Nicole for something down the line? I’m all for giving Shanice more time on canvas, and I wouldn’t hate it if she and Andre became an item — someone who doesn’t mind being public, unlike Dani. Or I can see Doug finally getting fed up with their arrangement and turning to the nurse for some “relief.” Vanessa was, in a way, telling herself off in those scenes with Ted about his cheating. And I have to say, Keith Robinson’s Ted brings a broader range of emotion than Maurice Johnson’s did — though I think Ted 2.0 is benefitting from better writing than OG Ted, whose arc relied more on MJ’s charisma and physical presence. That said, as someone else pointed out, Keith looks like he’s drowning in the clothes they’ve got him in. Hopefully, they’ve got some better-fitted attire lined up now.
    • They are just right there in your face.  It's hard to not see Ciara's boobs at all times.  And simmer down camera man, this is a family show!! The high school stuff makes it weird.  Physically the actors all look fine together.  It just makes me think Doug needs to find friends his own age.   With Ari at least Doug was under the impression she was over 21. I liked JJ and Eve too lol!
    • Specifically that's Kat & she is, there's no other way to say it except like pulling off a band-aid. She's Chad's "#1 fan" IOW, basically, kinda sorta she's an albatross around Chad's neck.  Kat can turn any conversation into a discussion of Chad & what he ate for breakfast or the most minute of minute things about Chad Duell's life & times.  We hope she's not dangerous. We hope she's just boring. That Chad is not back has lit a fire under her. She's upped her number of posts, which all relate in some way to Chad. Now you know what there is to know about as I said Chad Duell's #1 fan.     
    • The Duh-prees - Count me in as someone who cannot stand Kat’s fashion. No one walks around town dressed like that. And those wigs? Completely immovable. We have incredible wig technology these days—can’t the show find something better? - Vernon’s sermons are total FF material. - It looks like they’re setting up a past drinking habit for Anita (with all the “drowning” references), and maybe even a rape/child plot? Also—remember when Dani was an alcoholic? Lol.   Ted / Nicole / Leslie - Some people are projecting way too much onto OG Ted. Sure, he had screen presence, but his line delivery was pure caricature. He wasn’t menacing or threatening—he was a joke. NuTed may be meek, a bit one-note, and smaller in stature, but his confrontation with Leslie on Friday worked. Also, let’s be real—Bill’s not scary either. Total softie. Couldn’t scare a fly. - The ATWT reference was cute, but wasn’t the Duncan storyline from the ‘80s? Are we supposed to believe Nicole was already practicing back then? Since she said it was her patients who watched… like others pointed out, God forbid she watched herself! - Also: I stand corrected on Leslie. I think she’s starting to make more sense as a character. She’s fearless and provocative—that’s what drives her. I actually loved her mirror scene where Nicole 2.0 made her debut.   The non-Dupree characters - You guys were a bit dramatic about Monday’s show. It just had too many unlikeable storylines crammed into one. That’s all. Also, I stand by what I said about Derek and Ashley—their storyline is totally rom-com coded, and I’m into it. - I’ve developed a soft spot for Doug!!

      Please register in order to view this content

      And I thought that Vanessa ripping into Ted had a subtle layer of self-reprimand to it   - I officially can’t stand André. I don’t buy him as a playboy at all. Same goes for Pamela with her transatlantic accent. It’s such a shame that this is the first character CML had to create… and this is what we got?
    • party pics and vids from Don Diamont's wife Cindy Ambuehl https://www.instagram.com/p/DJ9X--uxnF2/
    • You’re really starting to see panic in the other actors’ eyes as they watch him struggle to get through his lines. There is a shot in yesterday’s episode in which  Swickard is standing behind Mo while he drones on and on, and the younger actor is clearly doing everything he can to hide his “WTF” face.
    • Don posted May 12th for 16th anniv of his B&B debut, and Michele Val Jean replied on May 21st: https://www.instagram.com/p/DJknIr8y4ra/

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I just saw this & I liked it. Maybe you will like it too. You do not have to attend every argument you are invited to. It seems to me to be a suitable adage for today's internet.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy