Jump to content

Barack Obama Elected President!


Max

Recommended Posts

  • Members

It's been talked about all over the news for weeks, the way the McCain campaign is keeping SP on a short leash (pun intended).

And this is from an excerpt that I linked to earlier from my local paper. The commentator is a moderate independent. If you would like a good read, go back and check it out.

Biden has answered quite a few impromptu questions, sometimes sticking his foot so far down his mouth that it's coming out his ass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I've heard a lot of people mention the lack of Biden in comedy. IMO, he's kind of hard to make fun of. He doesn't have some crazy accent (ala Palin), or something easy to make fun of (being older like McCain or some quirky personality like Clinton(s)). He does stick his foot in his mouth a lot, but a lot of that only happens because people pay close attention to what he says. The average SNL viewer probably wouldn't. The only thing crazy thing Biden has said that IMO, most remember is the higher taxes = patriotic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Global Warming is not necessarily an issue that has been split along party lines. There are many Republicans (as you posted earlier), notably John McCain, that believe in GW, as well as many Democrats. The Republicans do not really have an "agenda" to deny climate change. Your argument of political ideology playing into the global warming debate, is contradictory of your earlier point...showing Republican "believers"

So I am not really following your comment about Coleman being in the "pocket" of the GOP. What would Republicans gain from comments denouncing GW?

Using this same argument I'm not sure how you can critique my source as if all Republicans or conservatives do not believe and all Democrats and liberals do...

Here is one last "unbiased" source against GW, from the AC (affiliated with the Associated Press).

Global Warming is Not Real - What's Behind This Hoax?

The article's answer as to what's behind the hoax..money, and lots of it...Money to combat something that may not even exist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Another issue. I haven't heard the candidates talk about this, but I thought it would make for some colorful discussions in this thread.

Assisted suicide

There's an article from The Orlando Sentinel of a man in my hometown that shot his wife to death. Evidently she was ill and had cancer. His attorney is calling this a mercy killing.

Elderly man shoots wife

What do y'all think of this? I don't know if this would be considered "assisted suicide" or not, since we will never know if his wife asked him to put her out of her misery.

If your wife/husband/significant other asked you to end their life, and they had a terminal illness with no chance of recovery, would you honor their wishes? Would you do it even if they weren't terminal, but didn't want to go on living for some reason?

Personally, if I live to be 80 or so and am terminally ill, given a few months to live, I don't know what I'd do. But if my beloved partner asked this of me, I think I would do it for him if he were terminally ill.

Should this be legislated by the government at any level? Or should it continue to go through the courts as "murder" as in the story above?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was thinking about this subject last night while I was flipping between Letterman and Leno...I've noticed that niether of them ever make jokes about Obama/Biden. IA with you banbfan, that they are harder to pick on because of their lack of quirks..

But if you think about it...the late-night comedians usually use a quirk from a candidate that starts in a campaign and lasts throughout the entirety of the President's term in office.

For example:

Reagan: joked about his age, and being spacy-headed

Bush I: his accent--mannerisms-- Dana Carvey..enough said..

Clinton: womanizer..

Bush II: dumb..

I wonder what the cliched joke will be with Obama if he is elected? We all know, and have already seen jokes about McCain...age.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The media was in a particular huff yesterday about being frozen out of the meetings Palin participated in yesterday. CNN actually went so far as to withdraw before some sort of compromise was worked out. They also complained that McCain hadn't held a press conference in weeks and when he finally did yesterday it lasted about 11 minutes.

Both SNL and MadTV have made fun of Obama. I don't know that there is a whole lot funny about him, Biden, or even McCain at this point but some comedian may be working on it.

I disagree that the media not harping on Biden's gaffes and some trivial lawsuit is an indication of bias. It means that they are doing their jobs in not wasting people's time with rubbish and they probably think the trite topics they do cover are more interesting.

I would venture to guess that Palin's interviews would gain large audiences because people are trying to learn about her. Biden has been around for years so there isn't that urgency to learn more about him as opposed to learning a little something about someone who could be VP in a matter of weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Point taken. However, I do believe that there are many more Dems that believe in Global Warming than there are Republicans. Would you agree?

Perhaps not in today's political climate, with both McCain and Obama believing that it's a problem. However, there has most definitely been an agenda by the Bush Administration to downplay it's existence. One example is having the EPA's position watered down and numerous reports of scientists in places like NASA having to have someone in the administration review their reports on the subject. And if something was too supportive of GW, having the document changed to reflect GWB's views.

Big business support via lobbyists, for one thing. Big Oil's support as well.

Anyway. It's always interesting to hear your point of view because it's so different than mine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Palin gets question, looks to McCain, demurs

This is what happens when campaigns let reporters into photo ops. They get all uppity and ask questions.

From the pool report account of what happened after McCain and Palin's meeting with Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvilli and Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko:

McCain then looked around the room and gestured as if to welcome questions. The AP reporter shouted a question at Gov. Palin (“Governor, what have you learned from your meetings?”) but McCain aide Brooke Buchanan intervened and shepherded everybody out of the room.

Palin looked surprised, leaned over to McCain and asked him a question, to which your pooler thinks he shook his head as if to say “No.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'll believe what I see the evening of November 4th... going into the early morning hours as both camps refuse to concede... on into the next day when the recounts are demanded... through the coming weeks and into the next month as the legal challenges are brought forth... moving on do December when the Supreme Court weighs in and...

Well, you get the idea. I just hope Joe Biden's assemblege of great legal minds can help us avert was I'm sure will be certain disaster!

They avoid such nonsense so easily in other countries... I mean, you don't see Hugo Chavez arguing over hanging chads!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thank you, Jess! You have a very nice bias, too. :o

You know what really give me pause about McCain? His age. OMG... That makes the inexperienced, nasty-skank-in-the-box Palin NEXT IN LINE TO THE THRONE is his heart skips a beat away...

Just kidding! I'm okay with his age... and with Palin since the President really runs the government by committee.

Though we both know Clarence Thomas is in charge from the bench, with his nasty conservative ideology!!!! Damn him... :angry: Damn him to HELLLLLL!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • You are going to be so proud of me because I agree.  I kept thinking why is Sonny/Mo getting all the dialogue and gate keeping everyone's feelings when there are 3 other capable actors in these scenes?  Ned should have told Sonny to shut up lol. I am fine with Sonny getting a reaction, but he got 90% of the airtime for his reaction.  I don't even think it's mental health that's keeping his job.  MB wouldn't get this much time on screen if it was a pity thing.  Frank is too afraid to cut Sonny because of fan reaction.  I know there aren't any Sonny fans here, but I do think there are Sonny fans out there (besides me) lol.
    • I've been looking at the ratings during and after each head writer switch.  The ratings during Marcus' tenure (Oct 74 to April 75) were very good but at first not quite as high a Upton's (who was there six months prior. Marcus left when Mary Hartman was picked up as she was a creator and head writer). I've watched Marcus' interviews on Youtube; she discusses most of the soaps she worked on. She liked the money; she's not all warm and fuzzy about writing for them. She loved nighttime genres that gave her writing more flexibility than soapy dramas. But she was good at writing soaps.  By April 75, SFT was no.2 in the ratings behind ATWT. O'Shea was next (lasted 18 months) and in May 75, SFT high No. 1. When O'Shea left the show as still in the top five. O'Shea moved to OLTL in 77? but not as head writer so not sure why she left SFT. The Corringtons were the safest bet to keep long term. They needed to change direction by 1980 as the ratings were  dropping but still very solid 6s/low 20s share). They should have expanded the show to an hour and given the Corringtons some direction and more budget. One has to wonder about two people who were with the show for a long time: Mary Ellis Bunim was promoted to EP when she was about 28, amazingly and a woman! She as talented but she went through at 11 head writer changes if she started in 1974.  Here's her list of writers: Theodore Apstein (January 1974 – May 1974) 5 mo Gabrielle Upton (May 1974 – November 1974) 6 mo Ann Marcus (October 1974 - April 1975) 6 mo Peggy O’Shea (April 1975 – November 1976) 18 mo Irving Elman (with James Lipton) (November 1976 – Summer 1977) 9 mo Robert J. Shaw with Charles/Patti Dizenzo (August 1977 - Spring 78) 6-9 mo? Henry Slesar (Spring 78 to August 78) 3-4 mo? Corringtons (August 1978 to May 1980) 1 yr/9mo Linda Grover/John Porterfield (May 1980 to mid July 1980) 3 mo. Gabrielle Upton (July 1980 to at least through March or April) Harding Lemay April to June 81 writers' strike Don Chastain (Summer 1981 writers' strike - replaced by Ellis/Hunt Dec 81 or Jan 82) Then Fred Bartholemew comes in when Bunim goes to ATWT (Oct 81?) and he brings in Ellis Hunt for the NBC switchover, they lasted 11 months. Mary Stuart is the other mystery to me: how was she to work with? Did she instigate many of the writer firings? Was she not involved at all. No other P&G show went through this kind of frenetic change. (The Doctors might be a close second but wasn't on as long and not P&G).
    • I'm getting the sense that something happened between Anita and Dante Green that wasn’t exactly copacetic, to say the least. I wonder — did he promise her fame and fortune as a solo artist, and then attack her when she rebuffed his advances? I hope it’s not a long-lost child plot lurking out there for her. Maybe she left behind an sibling in poverty or something instead, back in Cabrini-Green/Chicago. It does seem like neither Tracy nor Sharon’s solo careers turned out the way they dreamed — both ended up singing at City Wineries. I still think Leslie is connected to the Duprees — maybe her mother is Sharon, and she's going after the Duprees because she believes she could’ve had their lifestyle if things had gone differently for her mom. She does have ties to Chicago. That said, I hope this is the last disguise from her toolbox for a while — I’d hate for that to get played out. But I do wonder if she’s going to use Nicole 2.0 to frame Nicole for something down the line? I’m all for giving Shanice more time on canvas, and I wouldn’t hate it if she and Andre became an item — someone who doesn’t mind being public, unlike Dani. Or I can see Doug finally getting fed up with their arrangement and turning to the nurse for some “relief.” Vanessa was, in a way, telling herself off in those scenes with Ted about his cheating. And I have to say, Keith Robinson’s Ted brings a broader range of emotion than Maurice Johnson’s did — though I think Ted 2.0 is benefitting from better writing than OG Ted, whose arc relied more on MJ’s charisma and physical presence. That said, as someone else pointed out, Keith looks like he’s drowning in the clothes they’ve got him in. Hopefully, they’ve got some better-fitted attire lined up now.
    • They are just right there in your face.  It's hard to not see Ciara's boobs at all times.  And simmer down camera man, this is a family show!! The high school stuff makes it weird.  Physically the actors all look fine together.  It just makes me think Doug needs to find friends his own age.   With Ari at least Doug was under the impression she was over 21. I liked JJ and Eve too lol!
    • Specifically that's Kat & she is, there's no other way to say it except like pulling off a band-aid. She's Chad's "#1 fan" IOW, basically, kinda sorta she's an albatross around Chad's neck.  Kat can turn any conversation into a discussion of Chad & what he ate for breakfast or the most minute of minute things about Chad Duell's life & times.  We hope she's not dangerous. We hope she's just boring. That Chad is not back has lit a fire under her. She's upped her number of posts, which all relate in some way to Chad. Now you know what there is to know about as I said Chad Duell's #1 fan.     
    • The Duh-prees - Count me in as someone who cannot stand Kat’s fashion. No one walks around town dressed like that. And those wigs? Completely immovable. We have incredible wig technology these days—can’t the show find something better? - Vernon’s sermons are total FF material. - It looks like they’re setting up a past drinking habit for Anita (with all the “drowning” references), and maybe even a rape/child plot? Also—remember when Dani was an alcoholic? Lol.   Ted / Nicole / Leslie - Some people are projecting way too much onto OG Ted. Sure, he had screen presence, but his line delivery was pure caricature. He wasn’t menacing or threatening—he was a joke. NuTed may be meek, a bit one-note, and smaller in stature, but his confrontation with Leslie on Friday worked. Also, let’s be real—Bill’s not scary either. Total softie. Couldn’t scare a fly. - The ATWT reference was cute, but wasn’t the Duncan storyline from the ‘80s? Are we supposed to believe Nicole was already practicing back then? Since she said it was her patients who watched… like others pointed out, God forbid she watched herself! - Also: I stand corrected on Leslie. I think she’s starting to make more sense as a character. She’s fearless and provocative—that’s what drives her. I actually loved her mirror scene where Nicole 2.0 made her debut.   The non-Dupree characters - You guys were a bit dramatic about Monday’s show. It just had too many unlikeable storylines crammed into one. That’s all. Also, I stand by what I said about Derek and Ashley—their storyline is totally rom-com coded, and I’m into it. - I’ve developed a soft spot for Doug!!

      Please register in order to view this content

      And I thought that Vanessa ripping into Ted had a subtle layer of self-reprimand to it   - I officially can’t stand André. I don’t buy him as a playboy at all. Same goes for Pamela with her transatlantic accent. It’s such a shame that this is the first character CML had to create… and this is what we got?
    • party pics and vids from Don Diamont's wife Cindy Ambuehl https://www.instagram.com/p/DJ9X--uxnF2/
    • You’re really starting to see panic in the other actors’ eyes as they watch him struggle to get through his lines. There is a shot in yesterday’s episode in which  Swickard is standing behind Mo while he drones on and on, and the younger actor is clearly doing everything he can to hide his “WTF” face.
    • Don posted May 12th for 16th anniv of his B&B debut, and Michele Val Jean replied on May 21st: https://www.instagram.com/p/DJknIr8y4ra/

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I just saw this & I liked it. Maybe you will like it too. You do not have to attend every argument you are invited to. It seems to me to be a suitable adage for today's internet.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy