Jump to content

Barack Obama Elected President!


Max

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 8.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

McCain Aide Blows Up at New York Times Over Freddie Mac Lobbying Claim

John McCain’s campaign manager said Wednesday that a report that his firm was paid $15,000 a month for several years — until last month — by Freddie Mac is “demonstrably false.”

“Mr. Davis has seen no income from Davis Manafort since 2006. Zero. Mr. Davis has received no salary or compensation since 2006. Mr. Davis has received no profit or partner distributions from that firm on any basis — weekly, bi-weekly, monthly, bi-monthly, quarterly, semi-annual or annual — since 2006. Again, zero. Neither has Mr. Davis received any equity in the firm based on profits derived since his financial separation from Davis Manafort in 2006,” said McCain campaign spokesman Michael Goldfarb.

“Further, and missing from the Times’ reporting, Mr. Davis has never — never — been a lobbyist for either Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. Mr. Davis has not served as a registered lobbyist since 2005.”

Tuesday’s report escalated a confrontation between the McCain campaign and The New York Times that flared up a day earlier, when the paper first reported that campaign manager Rick Davis was paid nearly $2 million over five years for defending both Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae against stricter regulations.

McCain adviser Steve Schmidt responded to the earlier report by lashing out at the newspaper, saying it was “in the tank” for Barack Obama and had “cast aside its journalistic integrity and tradition.” Times editor Bill Keller defended the newspaper and its coverage in a written statement.

--------------------

I must admit that anything coming from the New York Times, whether it is critical of McCain OR Obama, is suspicious. I have studied and worked in both print and broadcast journalism for long time... what I see in the media today bears no resemblence to what I was taught in regards to news gathering, fact checking, and objective reporting.

Having said that, this story -- any basis in fact or not -- will be ignored by voters, just as the stories about Obama's ties to Biden's lobbyist son were. This crap erupts, the media tosses it about for a day or so -- just long enough to obscure the truly important issues of the day -- before fading away...

>>sigh<<

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You see, I totally took your tone as in "we" - on this thread - are only talking about same sex marriage and abortion. So, I sincerely apologize to you, cct. I wasn't going to call you out, btw. :)

But ITA that the media is more interested in sensationalized non-stories that the real issues facing the voters this year.

:lol::lol::lol: You crack me up, Golden. I'm really enjoying reading your posts, even though you're <shudder> supporting McCain.

Anyway. Not to horn in on the question you asked of Jess...

Do I think Obama is perfect? No. There's no politician that is, frankly. Do I agree with all of his policies? No. Again, there aren't many politicians that will match up with you 100% of the time. However, for me, he's pretty damn close to what I'm looking for in a President and that's why I'm voting for him.

But don't worry. When he's elected, you will become a believer. ;)

I saw that this morning Roman on CNN. How screwed up is that?!? Jeez.

There's a commentary from my local paper that I thought I'd share. I saw some posts on media exposure/questions of the candidates and it relates to that. Interesting read.

Candidates stick to the script

And I'm soooo happy to see we're back to some real issues this morning! :):)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Economic Fears Give Obama Clear Lead Over McCain in Poll

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...2303667_pf.html

The reason I don't buy what these polls say... This poll shows Obama up by 9 points over McCain -- more than any other poll. So, I decided to check it out as the facts behind the poll ARE readily available. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/polit...&s_pos=list

Net Leaned Vote for both "Likely" and "Registered" voters was for Obama by about 10 points in both categories. Interesting... But why? Well, these breakdowns of Registered Voters sampled tell the story...

901. Generally speaking, do you usually think of yourself as:

Democrat-38 Republican-28 Independent-29 Other-5 No op.-1

904. (IF NOT DEMOCRAT OR REPUBLICAN) Do you lean more towards the:

Democratic Party-46 Republican Party-28 (VOL) Neither-24 No op.=2

And these categories go on forever... but it stands to reason that if you ask a majority that leans left, the are going to choose the left-leaning candidate. This is why the polls are a joke. There is absolutely no good way to really get a decent sampling of people. If they sampled an equal number of partisans from both sides, then left the balance to moderates, THAT might be useful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

ICAM, Golden. You have to take all polls with a grain of salt IMO. But am I a little happy when I see my man declared "leading" McCain? Sure. Who wouldn't be. But you make a good point with this breakdown. I would be more interested to see a balanced poll with equal numbers of left and right leaning persons.

I know that this has been posted before, but there's a new article on the NRA going after Obama:

NRA Begins Push

Does the NRA really have an eight-figure budget devoted to tearing down Obama? And then there's this excerpt:

Hmmmm. I would be very interested in hearing Casey's viewpoint on this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A mist slowly spreads across the floor as Brian stands before the Alter of Obama, the greatness shining forth. Shielding his eyes from the blinding brightness with his left hand, he clutched his chest with his right hand -- all the while locked in a valiant but fruitless struggle to fight the power enveloping his body, washing over his skin with the radiating warmth of a soothing, sensual shower. Despite his attempts to resist, the seductive energy firing forth from The Almighty Change brought him ever so closer until he finally found himself lifted from the floor and carried forward as if swept up by a hurricane, ultimately absorbed into Him -- finally becoming one with He who simply IS -- the one known as Barack.

Ummm, nah. Don't think so, dude. :D

<<wipes sweat from brow, then gazes nervously about>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If you didn't catch this on the CBS Evening News last night, the candidates talked about the issue of Climate Change:

Candidates On Climate Change

I'm at least happy to hear that McCain is taking the issue seriously. After 8 years of denial from the Bush Administration and his railroading of the EPA, it's time this issue got some attention.

They are both on paper as committed to joining international climate change efforts as well. Again, unlike the Bush Administration that basically thumbed it's nose to the international community with the Kyoto Protocol.

Thoughts? Golden? Casey? Roman?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm wondering what the basis of this man's comment is..What makes him feel that McCain could be dangerous in restricting gun rights? I have never heard anything to that effect before..

I dont think you want to know my views on global warming...this might open a really huge can of worms...I plead the 5th!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would like to hear 'em, sure. Why not? What's the worst that can happen? It's not like I'm going to hunt you down in Georgia somewhere! Even though it's not that far from Daytona. Hmmmm..

Anyway, speak up! It's not like you to refrain from making some pretty bold statements. People expect that from you. B)B)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The Gio reveal that he is both a Q and a Falcenari will cause upheaval, but I bet Monica's upcoming death will bring the families back together  
    • That would have made more sense than Brooke's other love interests in those years (including the man who killed her daughter).
    • I am counting on Martin to step up and check Bill next week. I need an old, nasty gay read down. Does anyone know if it has been stated that Dani went to college? I felt the same way. I got a bit worried when he didn't pick up the phone. I hope he is in good shape.    
    • @Faulkner Thank you, adding that to my queue.
    • I heard the first episode. I will be back after I've listened to more.
    • Even though I wasn't watching GL in real time by then, I was happy that MZ got his long-awaited for Lead Actor Emmy. MZ deserved more wins than the one he got. He wasn't nominated in 1991 but should have been and I think he could have won that year, and I also think he should have won in 1992.
    • How did you guys feel about Devon with Mark Dalton?  I believe so. Brooke needed a storyline that played on her history at that time. I could have seen Brooke fall for him now that she has grown up.
    • Forgive me because this stretches the topic a bit, but I cannot stop thinking about this line in Barbara Rush's (aka AMC Tad's doppelgänger's Ted's mother Nola Orsini & Flamingo Road's Eudora Weldon) wiki bio.

      Please register in order to view this content

      The quote comes from an article about Rush's daughter Claudia Cowen who is a reporter for Fox News.  Rush's ex-husband was one of the biggest publicists in Hollywood.  And, she had a famous house in Bel Air.  But, I want to know how at 70 years old, she wound up at the Lloyd Estate, which is huge, and had been owned by Ron Burkle and Ted Field.  The house was worth 60 million dollars in 2001.  But, I cannot find the story of why/when/how she lived there, because whenever she gets asked about it, she always says that she was “staying” there, not that she bought it. BTW, for those that may not know.  Her ex-husband, Warren Cowen, wound up marrying the mother of Sarah Gilbert (Roseanne & The Talk), as well as her siblings Melisa and Jonathan Gilbert (Little House on the Prairie).  So, Ms. Rush did not get her money from him, because she got remarried to a sculptor of minimal reknown, and they divorced in 1973. Ms. Rush died last year with dementia.
    • When does Liam die? I just want to watch B&B for his death scene and funeral

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy