Jump to content

ATWT: Monday November 5th


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I don't know about Bonnie....I thought it was a little strange she kissed Holden on the cheek, but acted so distant with Lisa. The lame "past" with Vienna seemed stupid, given how long ago it must have been. Barely a mention of Issac, and none of Sarah, Marshall Traver's daughter who she and Issac adopted. *sigh* If we must suffer with returns, why can't we get Issac back?? Paul Taylor...well, I didn't know what we had till he left.

AAAAAAhhhhh, the familiar feel of being trifled with. It defines being a Carjacker, that's for sure. Just as Jack admits his marriage didn't fail because of Carly, but because of what he's continued to feel for Carly...the joy of the moment is already gone. Thanks to the continued need to keep Carly as the underdog. I will say...Carly looked lovely today. And it was nice seeing someone (Lily!) actually overjoyed to hear she's not dying after all. Although it would have been nice if we'd seen Lily actually told of the news....

Boy, Dusty came off like an arrogant SOB today. Why are TIIC continuing this Dumily pairing? ICK. Why would Dusty want her, after the way she blew her stack about something he did when they weren't even together? The woman nearly KILLED him. And yet he's put that in the past. Chris seems really, really green. And not in an eco-friendly kind of way either.

Holden...Lily...SNOOOZE. Holden looked ridiculous accusing Lily because Dusty "helped" with Luke. All Dusty friggin' did was convince Noah to leave Luke and take him home. Holden acts as if Lil, Luke, Noah and him were all bobbing for apples and hanging out together all night. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I always love reading your posts PJ. :D I thought today's show was great! It was nice seeing Lisa and Emma. The writing still sucks but it was good seeing more variety in today's show. Bonnie's rivarly with Vienna was lame. I like NuBonnie. And was it just me or is the shaky camera gone? Today's camera views were great!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

*sigh* I loved today's show. I love how Jack was with Carly. Then I got a slap in the face when I remembered what my girl Carly had done. I HOPE there is a way for her to get out of this okay. She has to tell Jack before Fluffy does! I do not want to see her get satisfaction from telling Jack.

The whole Bonnie thing was weird. For one thing, sista girl had a bad weave. Her whole thing with Vienna was...not believable. Are they referring to Simon?

Holden sucks. That is all the time I am going to waste on his a**. Dusty, as sexy as he is, was a complete a** today. I still like him a lot more than Holden!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I have very detailed synopses of all 1976 storylines for the soaps from the Daytime Serial Newsletter. Please let me know if you are interested in a particular show and I will post it in the appropriate thread. As I stated they are very detailed, so I don't want to clutter up threads if posters are not interested.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Surely we (and Billy Flynn) are not going to be saddled with a character named Aristotle Dumas? This isn't 1970's Edge of Night.
    • What annoys me a little bit about the "day players" is they sound a bit too "Brooklyn-ish" sometimes.  Obviously, the show was taped in New York City, and the actors are all New York actors, but Monticello is supposed to be located in Illinois or Ohio.  Occasionally, they grab actors and actresses for small roles who have VERY distinct New York accents, which contrasts sharply with the main cast, none of whom have noticeable accents (except for our dashing European gigolo, Eliot Dorn, of course).  The heavy Brooklyn accent works fine if the character is a bookie, or the owner of a pawn shop, or a guy who's selling stolen guns on the street corner.  But when it's a steadily recurring character -- such as the first Mrs. Goodman, who worked for Miles and Nicole -- it's pretty jarring to me sometimes.  And you'll see it often -- such as an "under-five" character who witnesses a car accident, or a character who witnesses a shooting, or the occasional desk clerk, or waiter.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I'm screaming at those clips and gifs.  THIS IS PURE GOLD.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's always been my thought. I can't imagine that the show would play up the unseen AD so far in advance without them casting a *star*. After today's episode, I wonder if he'll somehow be connected with Diane. It was strange that Diane mentioned her very distant family today. I can't recall Diane ever talking about her backstory. Maybe he's her much younger brother?  It's also possible he's connected to Diane during her time in LA. Sally's already said she crossed paths with him. OC, I think Dumas is Mariah's mistake.... As a side note, it was good to see some mixing it up - Adam with Clare/Kyle and Sharon with Tessa.
    • Here's the place to share some memorable criticism. You don't have to agree with it, of course (that's often where the fun starts). Like I mentioned to @DRW50, Sally Field was a favorite punching bag in the late '80s and early '90s.   Punchline (the 1988 movie where she and Tom Hanks are stand ups): "It's impossible to tell the difference between Miss Field's routines that are supposed to be awful, and the awful ones that are supposed to be funny." -- Vincent Canby, New York Times. "It's not merely that Field is miscast; she's miscast in a role that leaves no other resource available to her except her lovability. And (David) Seltzer's script forces her to peddle it shamelessly." -- Hal Hinson, Washington Post. "As a woman who can't tell a joke, Sally Field is certainly convincing. ... Field has become an unendurable performer ... She seems to be begging the audience not to punch her. Which, of course, is the worst kind of bullying from an actor. ... She's certainly nothing like the great housewife-comedian Roseanne Barr, who is a tough, uninhibited performer. Sally Field's pandering kind of 'heart' couldn't be further from the spirit of comedy." -- David Denby, New York   Steel Magnolias: The leading ladies: Dolly Parton: "She is one of the sunniest and most natural of actresses," Roger Ebert wrote. Imagining that she probably saw Truvy as an against-type role, Hinson concluded it's still well within her wheelhouse. "She's just wearing fewer rhinestones." Sally Field: "Field, as always, is a lead ball in the middle of the movie," according to Denby . M'Lynn giving her kidney to Shelby brought out David's bitchy side. "I can think of a lot more Sally Field organs that could be sacrificed." Shirley MacLaine: "(She) attacks her part with the ferociousness of a pit bull," Hinson wrote. "The performance is so manic that you think she must be taking off-camera slugs of Jolt." (I agree. If there was anyone playing to the cheap seats in this movie, it's Shirley.) Olympia Dukakis: "Excruciating, sitting on her southern accent as if each obvious sarcasm was dazzlingly witty," Denby wrote. Daryl Hannah: "Miss Hannah's performance is difficult to judge," according to Canby, which seems to suggest he took a genuine "if you can't say something nice ..." approach. Julia Roberts: "(She acts) with the kind of mega-intensity the camera cannot always absorb," Canby wrote. That comment is so fascinating in light of the nearly 40 years Julia has spent as a Movie Star. She is big. It's the audience who had to play catch up. And on that drag-ish note ... The movie itself: "You feel as if you have been airlifted onto some horrible planet of female impersonators," Hinson wrote. Canby: "Is one supposed to laugh at these women, or with them? It's difficult to tell." Every review I read acknowledged the less than naturalistic dialogue in ways both complimentary (Ebert loved the way the women talked) and cutting (Harling wrote too much exposition, repeating himself like a teenager telling a story, Denby wrote). Harling wrote with sincerity and passion, Canby acknowledged, but it's still a work of "bitchiness and greeting card truisms." The ending was less likely to inspire feeling good as it was feeling relieved, according to Denby. "(It's) as if a group of overbearing, self-absorbed, but impeccable mediocre people at last exit from the house."
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy