Jump to content

Good Opinion Piece on Lack of Gays on Network TV


EricMontreal22

Recommended Posts

  • Members

The G&M tv critic is a self aknowledged grump but one I actually usually agree with:

A good piece in yesterday's Globe & Mail (which is kinda the Canadian equivalent to the NY Times) about gays on network tv, etc. I'm pasting the whole thign here as the website only works for subscribers:

Thank God for gay neighbours on Wisteria Lane

JOHN DOYLE

E-mail John Doyle | Read Bio | Latest Columns

October 25, 2007

So I read in the paper about this Dumbledore chap being gay.

You probably read it about it too, this being big news, apparently. Perhaps, like me, you were unsure of the identity of this Dumbledore. See, I'm no expert on the Harry Potter thing. Because I'm old and cranky, I suppose. (I'm not really, but Teddy, my former Occasional Summer Assistant, took that view daily.) I saw a Harry Potter movie on a plane, once, but was distracted from the drama by my ever-present copy of the Good Book. And yes, the Good Book is J.P. Donleavy's The Ginger Man.

Anyway, moving along - and thank heavens, says you - the emergence of a gay character in popular culture seems to have caused an inordinate amount of fuss. This is especially true of the U.S. media, which has reacted as if Dubya had announced that Mel B was his favourite Spice Girl and Tinky Winky was his favourite Teletubby.

The fact is that there are too few gay characters on U.S. network TV. It's a bizarre anomaly, and there is good reason to savour the arrival of gay neighbours on last Sunday's episode of Desperate Housewives.

It was done with delicious wit and irony. Bob (Tuc Watkins) and Lee (Kevin Rahm) moved to Wisteria Lane because Bob was fed up with the seediness of the city and fancied a nice, clean life in the suburbs. It appears that Bob is a businessman and Lee, obviously his long-time companion, is the househusband. Lee's not too thrilled about moving to the 'burbs. He's quite pointedly suspicious of the whole thing.

So Bob and Lee move in and are first greeted by Susan (Teri Hatcher). By the way - I'm not giving all away here, there's much more fun to enjoy if you haven't seen it yet. Lee glares at the perky, friendly Susan when she burbles about how great it is to meet her new neighbours. Then it dawns on her that she's meeting a gay couple.

"I watch cable," she says, to signal her profound knowledge of gay men living together. "I think it's super!" she exclaims with unerring stupidity. Then Bob arrives and mentions "Raphael." Susan tries to take this in stride. "Oh, there are three of you. That's just great!" she asserts. Lee looks at her the way some people look at me when I suggest that Little Mosque is, you know, an okay show. "Yeah, right" Lee snaps. "We're gay Mormons."

Raphael is actually Bob and Lee's dog. There follows some good comic business centred on Raphael.

The key element in this droll exchange is Susan's declaration that she knows about gay couples from watching cable TV.

In fact, ABC, which airs Desperate Housewives, is the leader in having gay and lesbian characters on network series. According to the annual study of these matters by the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD), network series in the 2007-08 TV season will feature eight regularly seen characters who are gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgendered (ie characters played by actors who have a contract with the show), which is down from nine characters in 2006 and 10 the season before. Note that the seven emerge from analyzing the content of a total of 87 comedies and dramas with 650 characters.

Those eight characters are on seven shows - Brothers & Sisters, Desperate Housewives, Ugly Betty, Dirty Sexy Money, The Office and the upcoming midseason series Cashmere Mafia. Of the eight, seven are on ABC and one is on NBC. The GLAAD study concluded that there are no lead or supporting characters who are gay on CBS, FOX or CW shows.

Meanwhile, looking at cable networks, including HBO, Showtime and FX, which air a considerable amount of drama and comedy, GLAAD found 40 gay characters appearing regularly on 21 scripted shows.

Now, call me naive or a know-nothing, but this situation is just nuts. If the kids who are captivated by the Harry Potter stories can take the news that Dumbledore is gay, surely most grownups watching network TV can accept more gay characters in dramas and comedies.

But, perhaps, it's going to be like this - the next time a network (other than ABC) airs a Harry Potter movie, Dumbledore goes mysteriously missing. Riddle me that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy