Jump to content

AMC: SOW Interview with Amanda Baker


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Amanda was a capable actress on NS....but she seriously has to bring it. Like it or not, Babe is an "important" character on AMC. There is no time for her to "adjust" to being Babe. She needs to hit it out of the park or leave. It's been what....5 months since Sabine joined AMC and she's still "adjusting". Well while they're adjusting, we're being forced to watch their half-assed attempt at being a good actress. It's not their fault their predecessors kicked ass...but it is their fault that they aren't bringing it.

ACT OR DIE is what I'm going into this as. I tried to be optimistic w/ Sabine and it blew up in my face. Never again...........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't know, I understand that Babe is in a big storyline and the character had t be immediately recast. Nonetheless, when characters are immediately I find it really jarring. When Alicia took over as Kendall (and I FLOVE SMG as Kendall) it took me a bit to like her but Ilove her in the role now. I lov Sabine in the role of Greenlee. I think time needs to pass before a recast. I'm not confident in this recast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought they should have kept AH till the end of this major storyline! She had such chemistry with Wes/Ritchie!

Amanda has to bring it the first and second epi! If not then I will never look at Babe the same way!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

OMG! Seriously! Why are people acting like Babe is this dynamic character played by this dynamic/powerhouse actress?! This isn't Sarah Michelle Gellar's Kendall, Becky Budig's Greenlee or Sarah Brown's Carly (GH).

This is a character that has basically been pimped and propped to no end because, clearly, she can't stand alone without destroying other characters to support her -- played by a blonde Britney Spears/Jessica Simpson look alike. Sorry, but let's be real, here. Alexa Havins was not hired by the shallowest of casting directors (Judy Blye 'It's All About the Look' Wilson) because of her phenomenal acting talent -- she was hired because she resembled what was "hot" at the moment. 2003 was all about Britney and Jessica Simpson, and Brian Frons loves his blondes.

All Amanda Baker (GAWD, another "Amanda" has infiltrated this show) has to do is speak with a generic nasal twang, shed a few crocodile tears when she rationalizes all of her sociopathic behavior (sleeping with her husband's brother, lying about her previous un-annulled marriage, doctoring pregnancy tests, kidnapping babies, telling parents their infants are dead, cheating on her husband because he has the nerve to be grieving for a presumed dead little sister, etc.), and she should be quite alright. All Babe has done these last four years was cry, blame JR for all of her horrible actions, repeat them, and cry again. The fact that she has been background ever since McTavish left -- and it hasn't unsettled the show -- is evidence that Babe and Alexa aren't that much of a central figure on this show.

Reflecting what was mentioned in the Patrick Mulcahey article about the writing of "Carly Benson," it seems the writers were scared to make any major decisions with the Babe character because McTavish wanted her to be liked and worshipped. The only decisions the writers made was to make Babe cause her own trouble so she could play JR's victim, in an obvious attempt to get the viewers to sympathize with her.

Next thing you know, people will be screaming at a Ryan recast: "He better bring it, or else he'll never compare to Cameron's :mellow: "

I wish Alexa the best of luck, and maybe she'll be able to play a better written role than Babe Carey ever was -- but Amanda Baker has plenty of room to play in this role

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU R SINCLAIR! I could not agree more. The character of Babe Carey is nothing but a passing ingenue in a long line of passing ingenues on AMC. She's not a brilliant creation, not some significant soap character that changed the way people looked at soap opera as a genre, and CERTAINLY not half of any supercouple.

I don't necessarily think that Babe needs to go - I am interested to see Amanda Baker's portrayal, since to me she was one of the strong points of Night Shift - but I guarantee you in a few years we'll be looking at Babe like GH fans look at Courtney. She's not even as significant as OLTL's oft-hated Jen - her death years ago still resonates in Llanview today, as her death prompted Lindsay to take a fierce motherly attitude toward Marcie which in turn led to Spencer's murder. Look at it that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The character of Babe is a horribly written one, but no one and I mean NO ONE can dispute Alexa's acting ability. Hate Babe or not, Alexa made the Babe character. No one is saying that "Babe" is so important that she couldn't be recast, but Amanda has some tough shoes to fill. With a weaker actress, Babe would NOT have lasted as long as she did on AMC. It was Alexa's portrayal that made you either love Babe, or hate her.

Frons may have hired Alexa for her looks, but she damn sure backed it up with talent. To try and undermine what she's brought to the role is really unfair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think Alexa Havins is a very good actress, yes. I also think that Kelli Giddish, Terri Ivens, and Tanisha Lynn are also very good. I'm not undermining anything, I just don't see the value of the character at all, no matter the actress.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You're welcome! :lol:

But, really, I agree with you. The Babe Carey character was just executed poorly. She came on in one direction then OVERNIGHT shifted into another and everything on the show was ruined to support this change in character. I'm not saying that she didn't have her likeable qualities (I can understand how Babe has some fans), but overall, the character was horribly, shapelessly, insultingly written -- and she was also shoved down our throats for four years. I believe her overuse made people think that she was a bigger character than she was, as if the show wouldn't last without having a Babe in some form or fashion.

It's funny you should mention GH's Courtney Matthews -- because for years, I've been saying that McTavish's writing is so predictable, that she writes formulaic caricatures -- not organic, interesting characters. When she wrote GH, Jax could easily be mistaken for Ryan. Carly could've easily passed for Kendall. Same for AJ and JR, both being alcoholic rich kids with overbearing fathers. And Courtney -- who was a McTavish creation -- was identical to Babe. The naive ingenue who was duped by the drunken rich boy.

Absolutely nothing original about this character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not really. I honestly think she played what was written. If she brought anything at all to the role, I don't think it happened until this past year, with the whole Zoe/Satin Slayer storyline. That was a difficult story to pull off for all of the actors involved, and I think she did a good job. I won't take that away from her. But overall, the past four years, she skated on McTavish and Frons' love for her and the character. That's the only reason the role lasted so long. She had a lock with the idiots in charge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I don't expect Lois to be the same person she was 25 years ago, but she's definitely lost a lot of what made Lois unique.  It's clear the show doesn't know how to write for her, and the sole purpose of Lois is to hide this Gio secret.  It's a shame she doesn't interact with more of the canvas.  It's a waste of Rena's talents. I like Brook Kerr most of the time.  She can be hit or miss.  I totally get what you are saying about her line readings too.  I honestly think the character really suffers being stuck in the Curtis pairing.  She's much better than Tanisha Harper's Jordan lol.
    • Friday and yesterday's episode is what daytime television should be. The other shows airing could take a page from yesterday's show.  I loved the rage, hurt and anger Nicole unleashed on Ted.  Daphnee should be up for an Emmy nom for these scenes.  It broke my heart to see how Dana had locked Eva out.  I do feel sorry for Eva.    I am still bumfuzzled as to why Leslie/Dana went to the DuPree's and asked them to accept Kat UNLESS Eva is really Kat's twin (and really Nicole and Ted's daughter that maybe they though they lost or an embryo Dana/Leslie stole??) I loved how Anita and Vernon both shot her down.    Ohhh and let me just say Friday and yesterday was the MOST fire I have seen Martin have since the show started.  Maybe Brandon Clayborn is coming into his own with the role finally.    
    • You've been seeing him all along. You just didn't know it was him, I guess. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Where to for Dana? She's pissed off the Duprees (most of the cast), alienated her daughter and will she be welcomed by the Have Nots at the diner? Maybe she can befriend Ashley and Derek and liven up their story.
    • Melissa Ordway announced she was moved to recurring back in November but is still credited with the contract cast members.
    • I think of Evan as a smarmy bast*rd. Maybe you'll like that description. You certainly have him pegged correctly since he is just a soldier following "Admiral" Iris's marching orders.  
    • So far the only interest I've seen from Evan to Amanda has been listening to Iris's orders to go and seduce her.  So far he hasn't been successful... but who knows. Amanda is unbearable at times. Entitled, spoiled... idiotic. Iris... so blatantly manipulating her and Amanda takes the bait. But I guess... when she gets in trouble... she'll have a chance to learn. That's what makes these shows so interesting.    Oh, no, don't worry. You haven't ruined a thing. Evan has not been on my radar that much... he was not one of the characters I was caring particularly... so nothing much has been changed for me. I don't think he has the stuff to ruin Rachel's life. He's just a pretty guy that can follow orders. Iris on the other hand... is dangerous. 

      Please register in order to view this content

        P.S Maybe Evan will surprise me. Who knows. 
    • The show has gone back to 10/10 entertainment! I'm glad that I was right in feeling that what were experiencing were growing pains. I'm sure they are not over yet, but I'll know that we always comeback to quality drama. I think it's going to be a hell of ride (in a good way) from this moment on. BTG has that magic that not a lot of shows have. I'll update more... when I'm done catching up.
    • So very glad to hear this. Yesterday I suddenly thought; OMG, what about spoilers, have I just  ruined things for Maxim in getting carried away with interest in Evan, who was so well-written & well-acted. BTW, your fan review of this episode was a sight for eyes that had not seen one of these for a little bit too long, LOL!!!  Mitch is also fascinating to me but in his case it's because he was all in with Janice & her nefarious plan & then he did this turnabout we've mentioned & he basically got off scot-free.
    • It does seem cheap and lazy for this show to have just one family. Passions was heavily criticized but it was nicely structured with a total of four families.      
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy