Jump to content

AMC: What would you do to save AMC?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I think Kylie's post makes a lot of sense. Until TIIC acknowledge that AMC has a lot of problems, it doesn't matter who is or isn't on the show. Someone needs to come in and clean house. Get rid of Carruthers and a lot of the writers on the staff. I am not sure if B&E are just really weak writers or if they are not being given any choice in what they write. Maybe go ahead and get rid of them. Refocus AMC and start acting like it is life or death for the show. And it really is because it will be very difficult to gain back audience once they have lost them.

One thing that really bothered me about B&E when they did some of their first interviews was the fact that they thought AMC was in really good shape. They were happy to be taking over such a strong show. The reality was AMC was slipping and very fast. Too many years of McTrash and all the other idiots. Someone needed to come in and make major changes and shake ups on the show. Instead, they keep all the same writers. They continue in the general direction that McTavish was going but at least McTavish tried to throw in shocks and surprises once in a great while. Don't worry....I still hate McTravesty!!! :D These new writers are playing it WAY to safe and they are becoming boring and predictable. Frankly, I am worried about the future of AMC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah I've read that before. I have a huge amopunt of respect and admiration for Harding--and loved his book 8 Years in Another World. But... He's dead wrong. They did have agenerational thing but it was minor--I agree there, and I wouldn't want that at AMC. Although when Sydney was replaced with Tracy Q (who may not actually be much older but seemed more mature) they added a sorta mother hen figure, albeit a brilliantly warped one. But you had people like Buck and Tess entering their 40s, Angie and Jacob, etc, then the younger really clueless people trying to feel their way liek Ally, Zoe, etc.

What Harding failed to see was how it managed to have a true sense of community and friendship with the community being the tenants of this building--which was quite remarkable I felt, and handled better than most soaps at the time. It also managed to inter weave a large amount of types of stories (from topical to mor emelodramatic) really well.

Harding Lemay was a consultant on OLTL in the very late 90s. It was pretty awful. I wonder if that says anything :P (sorry--cheap shot but...)

E

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

"One thing that really bothered me about B&E when they did some of their first interviews was the fact that they thought AMC was in really good shape. They were happy to be taking over such a strong show. The reality was AMC was slipping and very fast."

To be fair I saw that more as B/E not wanting to hurt any feelings or create ennemies...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The City kinda struck me as a daytime version of Melrose Place that was set in New York City. Like Melrose, it didn't have a strong multi-generation aspect, there was a key apartment complex, there was the resident queen bitch, ect.

Though, Sunset Beach was like Melrose Place set closer to the beach and that didn't really have the big core family aspect and didn't last long either.

Maybe Lemay was right in his reasoning, since soaps like The City and Sunset Beach never caught on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know I'm gonna sound like I'm obssessively definding the City and maybe I am but...

I think that's wrong, though ont he surface kinda true. Sunset was much more like a SPelling primetime soap (though it kinda found a self referential style of its own). I think it's true that that style of soap doesn't last long on daytime where we need a bit more "reality" (passions aside I guess) and family relatability to watch dialy.

As for the City--it very much was a modern take ont eh Agnes Nixon formula (which is perhaps why she co created it and was listed as story consultant). The Complex was a way of making a little community within a major city like New York--so the complex had the rich loft, poorer people's apartments, a fashion mag studio, the bar for people to meet, a clinic, etc... The characters were nealry all down to earth, middle class and relatable--with a lot of social storylines thrown at us (at first not too subtly--the transgendered one, a daytime first I think, was handled way too quick). ABC gave it just over a year before they canceled it. It's last 6 months it was the ONLY soap on ABC to see its ratings climb (admittedly slowly) with each week just when the res tof ABC daytime was starting to fall...

E

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm going to take up this cause. That show had a lot of potential, but being a half hour in a bad timeslot, it suffered.

I never saw it in English, only in French. It used to turn up on the French stations here quite often (as did SB, Loving, SuB.) In fact I'm not even sure it was ever broadcast by the local ABC affiliate during daytime. Seems to me I sawr it at 1:00 am.

I loved the whole concept of it.

Sure, Lemay had "a" point, but we seem to have forgotten how refreshing a half hour show can be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I don't expect Lois to be the same person she was 25 years ago, but she's definitely lost a lot of what made Lois unique.  It's clear the show doesn't know how to write for her, and the sole purpose of Lois is to hide this Gio secret.  It's a shame she doesn't interact with more of the canvas.  It's a waste of Rena's talents. I like Brook Kerr most of the time.  She can be hit or miss.  I totally get what you are saying about her line readings too.  I honestly think the character really suffers being stuck in the Curtis pairing.  She's much better than Tanisha Harper's Jordan lol.
    • Friday and yesterday's episode is what daytime television should be. The other shows airing could take a page from yesterday's show.  I loved the rage, hurt and anger Nicole unleashed on Ted.  Daphnee should be up for an Emmy nom for these scenes.  It broke my heart to see how Dana had locked Eva out.  I do feel sorry for Eva.    I am still bumfuzzled as to why Leslie/Dana went to the DuPree's and asked them to accept Kat UNLESS Eva is really Kat's twin (and really Nicole and Ted's daughter that maybe they though they lost or an embryo Dana/Leslie stole??) I loved how Anita and Vernon both shot her down.    Ohhh and let me just say Friday and yesterday was the MOST fire I have seen Martin have since the show started.  Maybe Brandon Clayborn is coming into his own with the role finally.    
    • You've been seeing him all along. You just didn't know it was him, I guess. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Where to for Dana? She's pissed off the Duprees (most of the cast), alienated her daughter and will she be welcomed by the Have Nots at the diner? Maybe she can befriend Ashley and Derek and liven up their story.
    • Melissa Ordway announced she was moved to recurring back in November but is still credited with the contract cast members.
    • I think of Evan as a smarmy bast*rd. Maybe you'll like that description. You certainly have him pegged correctly since he is just a soldier following "Admiral" Iris's marching orders.  
    • So far the only interest I've seen from Evan to Amanda has been listening to Iris's orders to go and seduce her.  So far he hasn't been successful... but who knows. Amanda is unbearable at times. Entitled, spoiled... idiotic. Iris... so blatantly manipulating her and Amanda takes the bait. But I guess... when she gets in trouble... she'll have a chance to learn. That's what makes these shows so interesting.    Oh, no, don't worry. You haven't ruined a thing. Evan has not been on my radar that much... he was not one of the characters I was caring particularly... so nothing much has been changed for me. I don't think he has the stuff to ruin Rachel's life. He's just a pretty guy that can follow orders. Iris on the other hand... is dangerous. 

      Please register in order to view this content

        P.S Maybe Evan will surprise me. Who knows. 
    • The show has gone back to 10/10 entertainment! I'm glad that I was right in feeling that what were experiencing were growing pains. I'm sure they are not over yet, but I'll know that we always comeback to quality drama. I think it's going to be a hell of ride (in a good way) from this moment on. BTG has that magic that not a lot of shows have. I'll update more... when I'm done catching up.
    • So very glad to hear this. Yesterday I suddenly thought; OMG, what about spoilers, have I just  ruined things for Maxim in getting carried away with interest in Evan, who was so well-written & well-acted. BTW, your fan review of this episode was a sight for eyes that had not seen one of these for a little bit too long, LOL!!!  Mitch is also fascinating to me but in his case it's because he was all in with Janice & her nefarious plan & then he did this turnabout we've mentioned & he basically got off scot-free.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy