Members stenbeck212 Posted July 26, 2007 Members Share Posted July 26, 2007 ^That's how it goes these days. When misogyny doesn't work into the plot, soaps just terrorize children! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Soapsuds Posted July 26, 2007 Author Members Share Posted July 26, 2007 I would have loved for Lucinda to say, "You are going to regret doing that!".....or something along that lines. If the slap from her wasnt coming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members ClassicsSoapFan Posted July 26, 2007 Members Share Posted July 26, 2007 I wanted a slapback too!!! I remember when Charles Keating was on as Niles Mason. Thomas Gibson was his son Derek. Lucinda leaned they were behind the fire/bomb at the cottage were Lily supposedly perished. Lucinda walked in the police station and spat at Niles hitting him in the face. The camera held on Keating and he started to chuckle. I can't help but think that was the actor's reaction and not the character. I rewound that tape back and forward watching that scene! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members All My Shadows Posted July 26, 2007 Members Share Posted July 26, 2007 Lucinda should have bitch-slapped the [!@#$%^&*] out of that useless ho Meg. MEG, YOU ARE A USELESS HO! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members winterguy125 Posted July 26, 2007 Members Share Posted July 26, 2007 Lucinda did not slap Meg, but if looks could kill, the look on Lucinda's face would have done it. I agree with soapsuds I don't think Lucinda is quite done with Meg yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members stenbeck212 Posted July 26, 2007 Members Share Posted July 26, 2007 Did anybody else catch Meg saying Emma has singlehandedly run the farm for ALMOST two decades? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members P.J. Posted July 26, 2007 Members Share Posted July 26, 2007 I swear, I shudder to think of what has to happen to little Sage to finally glue her parents back together. It's not that I don't understand that Jack and Carly really need to rebuild their trust, and that some joint worrying about the children will speed that along. It's that instead of doing something semi-realistic, like Jack actually acknowledging that JJ is just NOT going to "come around" to Katie, and how Jack's actions have pushed his child away (just as much as Carly's did with Parker), we get some cartoonish villians to throw Carjack in to some uber flight or fight mode. I don't think the villians are the lamest plot Carjack have been churned through---that would be Katie, the suddenly very, very unCarly-ish Katie, whose past has been conveinently forgotten by Jack. Compared to Katie...the mystery of the "missing beautiful baby boy" looks like genius. Pure genius. And Emma/Meg/20 years??!!?!?!?! I knew there was something else stupid Meggie said! Please, Meg's father died when she was a toddler. That would be about 40 years ago, hun. The Snyders have been on the show more than 20, even. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Sweet_VeeVee24 Posted July 26, 2007 Members Share Posted July 26, 2007 That is the thing that bothers me...Jack won't even acknowledge the fact that Parker is going through things that need his undivided attention; and then top it off with JJ outright telling him that he didn't want Katie in their lives...Common sense would tell any father that his kids happiness are important too...not just his own..and he knows that his kids will never be happy with Fluffster trying to buy them off with fancy make-overs and pathetic attempts at bonding like one of the gang... But I forgot this is the same man that after he regained his memory, totally blew off Parker to do all things JJ and also made that cutting little comment to Carly "I chose you didn't I" when she asked him if he still had a thing for Julia II. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members JSROCKS Posted July 26, 2007 Members Share Posted July 26, 2007 Jack IMO has always been a condesending patronizing jerk. Yes there is major chemistry between him and Carly but to me it dosen't make up for the fact that he is truly an a$$. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Cheap21 Posted July 27, 2007 Members Share Posted July 27, 2007 LOL..who is fluffhead? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members P.J. Posted July 28, 2007 Members Share Posted July 28, 2007 Katie. Because her stories are usually less-than-deep thinking, heavy drama. They are fluffy, she is Fluffy. Sort of like Madonna. And you can use it like an adjective. Object to her many men/slutty ways? She can become FluffMe, FlufferNutter, FluffedByAll. Is she in a nasty mood? FluffZilla. Is she just acting dumber than usual? FluffTwit suits her well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.