Jump to content

All: Grade the soaps


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

ATWT: C-[/b]

The Good: Luke/Maddie/Noah- all actors are doing a terrific job in this storyline, which we are not seeing enough off. Maura West: having Carly back is a big improvement fot this show, Marie Masters: seeing Susan involved in a storyline is great, even though it's Allison's story, Marie brings so much realism to the character of Susan.

The Mediocre: The teens (JJ, Sage, Faith, and Parker) are likeable and can actually act. The great group od recurring actors: Terri Gaber, Robin Mattson, etc.

The Bad: Cleo (glad that is over!) Jade leaving (just when I was finding the character instersting.)Where are the vets? Don Hastings, Helen Wagner, Scott Holmes, and Eileen Fulton. The Paul/Meg/Craig/Lucinda mess. Holden and Lily headed for another breakup. And last but certainly not least----- KACK!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

B&B: A

It has been extremely flawless as of late. Heck it might even be A+ on certain days. The dialogue is to die for, they suddenly use the whole cast (I'm sure LAD is back in the mix very soon), storylines rotate as I've haven't seen it on soaps in years, the acting has been very good. Fantastic, and a real classic soap opera. Kudos to Brad Bell & the Y&R cast-aways...

2007 overall mark: B+ with an increasing tendency

Y&R: Mark withheld

I'm no longer watching but when I catch 5 seconds I want to shake my head against a wall. It is nothing but dumb, the dialogue is extremely bad, there are only few good actors left in decent stories and the music is like stolen from a videogame.

2007 overall mark: D+ witha declining tendency to F

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

GH - B

Good - Feisty, energetic, Carly. The show would be so dull without her. Noah becoming a rock star. I love the dual Rick Springfield's. The Jason paternity story is getting real good. Kate and Sonny.

Bad - Jax has been gone too long. The Iraq story. Not every military person returning from Iraq is a psycho/drug addict. The whole Logan and his father story does nothing for me. Kelly leaving the bar and attempting sex with Jerry, and she is a friend of Robins, and a doctor? That's bad.

Ugly-Alan Q "fading". I so hope they tell us he is alive. Not much story for the older characters like Monica Tracy Edward and you know the rest. When will soaps get a clue?

OLTL - C

I would give OL a B except for the loser character of Marty.

Good - Todd is back.

Bad - Evangleine is not back. David is leaving.

Ugly - How will Michael and Rex explain they kept Tommy's identity a secret?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • https://www.nzherald.co.nz/lifestyle/shortland-street-fears-speculation-grows-about-shows-future-amid-industry-struggles/T2GECWXTI5AD3AMEV46YYYUE6E/ Still a big cloud over whether the show will get another year.
    • I had hoped they'd pair her with Michael Knight. They had a nice chemistry and he's been one of the better random castings on GH. When it comes to Gio, I found the scenes with Dante to be overdone. It's obvious they're trying to set up conflict for the reveal but I don't think that was needed. It actually made me less excited for the reveal and killed any interest I had in Dante and Gio forming a bond.
    • He also lost the woman he was going to marry, under very sudden circumstances. They are probably surprised Rena has wanted to stay. I think Lois works OK in her current capacity, if they allowed her to have more of a point of view, a bit more life of her own, and not just the reason for Gio's paternity being hidden. The character always felt very thin to me and on paper this dynamic with Tracy, Brook Lyn, Gio, visits from Gloria could be better for her than how overly centered she was on the canvas the first time around. But as of now she could be better used.  Somehow the show that was revived due to supercouples seems completely alien to romance. The older cast has this hardest but even with tiers who are younger or middle-aged, they've really dragged their feet about Liz and Lucky, they have contorted themselves in trying to figure out how to pair a man with Joss, Kai and Trina barely get focus...and others I struggle to remember. They also blew up Sasha/Cody so now I guess we're meant to be waiting to see if she finds true love with Jason? The show is so hesitant and when you are this hesitant it means you are incapable of writing romance.
    • I agree.  Rena doesn't seem to mind the lighter workload and seems happy though. Strangely, a lot of the veteran cast are without viable love interests-Sonny, Nina, Lois, Jason, Tracy, Alexis, Carly (Brennan doesn't count).  The show lacks serious interest in romance.
    • I just can't wait until next week when we can go back to a full weeks worth of episodes. 3 episodes and a mid-week gap has been so difficult to deal with, especially in light of how good the show is.
    • I always hoped they'd change Parker's paternity back to Phillip.  I guess it doesn't matter since Chloe is off the show currently.  I don't recall Holly or Maggie mentioning Parker, so it's not they are close to him. 
    • I’ve reached the summer of 1998.  Until now, my impression has been that the show has steadily improved since the great quality dip of 1994, reaching as high as 8/10 in 1997. Sure, I could complain about a few things in 1997 (Claudia got wasted after her initial storyline; Thorne’s feelings for Taylor were a bit too sudden; the storyline where Sheila lived with James and Maggie while pregnant got rather boring; Mike periodically revisiting Sheila despite being on the run from authorities), but overall it was a very strong year.  I liked the Thorne/Taylor/Ridge triangle, the mystery plot about who shot Grant, the sham wedding to trap Sheila, Stephanie/Eric/Lauren, and Clarke manipulating his way back to working at Forrester. I even liked the Greenland storyline with Eric/Lauren/Rush, although I had expected to hate it. Maybe 1996 tops 1997 in raw soapy excitement (especially as Sheila got a chance to interact with a larger canvas of characters), but certain problems with overall storyline cohesion puts it somewhat below 1997 for me. Unfortunately, early 1998 has turned out to be a bit of a speedbump, perhaps on par with 1995 levels of quality: - Maggie’s character really got trashed after James left her to be with Sheila, and the early 1998 storylines where she imprisoned Sheila in the house from Psycho, or installed those wires and mikes and such in her house to make her think she’s going crazy, were total GARBAGE. So much so that the latter storyline (and Maggie with it) pretty much disappeared into a limbo.  - I have mixed feelings about the twins plotline with Lauren. No way did Rush survive being shot with a crossbow through the chest, and the romance between Lauren and Rush’s good twin brother Johnny was rather dry to me. I did however enjoy the camp aspect of Rush taking his brother’s place to be with Lauren, and Eric rescuing her. But it doesn’t appear like Bell cared too much about the Johnny/Lauren romance beyond the twin storyline gimmick, and it too disappeared in an unsatisfactory manner (come on, why not hire Johnny’s actor for just 5 more episodes for an arc where he realizes Lauren is not over Eric, or JUST SOMETHING?) - Clarke wormed his way back to FC in late 1997, which had exciting storytelling potential, but then he disappeared almost entirely. Sad to see my favorite character wasted in this manner. Does he get anything interesting to do between now and the Morgan saga of 2000-2001? - The Thomas saga was entertaining in 1997, but it got stretched out too much, and made some of early 1998 tiresome, with Ridge having to decide YET AGAIN which woman he wants to be with. On the plus side, I like the plotline of Thorne being neighbors with Macy and Grant, and we’ve finally been introduced to the SORASed Rick/Amber/CJ crowd. The Stephanie/James/Sheila triangle is also starting, and it makes me excited (I remember seeing some if it in my childhood). I know Sheila, Grant, and James are all leaving soon, which I honestly kind of dread - between them and Clarke’s near-absence, it feels like herd is going to get culled too much in the near future. But I know there’s the familiar 1999-2002 to look forward to.
    • LOL - this is a perfect description, and that's what I loved about it! May be a bit campy, but it immediately caught my attention in a good way.  I'm not familiar with the Fishing Trip storyline, I'll have to look that up. I've noticed that about Josh, which has made him less attractive to me overall. He just yells a lot when he's not happy. Wow, Reva was married to HB!  LOL - "Always... eventually, and again"
    • I love your ideas. I would love to see Jack grown up this confused unhinged individual. He should hold a grudge against both Brooke and Taylor.   
    • @chrisml

      Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy