Jump to content

PSNS: Friday February 9


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 20
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

This was one of my favorite episodes of the year, if not the best for Passions this year IMo.

I love having so much of the cast on and at the Blue Note.

JUVY rock. Figures we get this now with the show ending soong.

Simone/Rae was cute and the little scene with TC accepting it was great.

MW had lots of energy today and I like Chris coming on to her. Luis/Fancy was ok but this rape story appalls me. I love them as a couple but this is bringing them down for me.

Rebecca/Ethan was good. Great to see her again. Lindsey rocked that last scene and I liked the text message ending with Theresa.

The Scissor sisters were great. Loved the Endora stuff.

Noah/Paloma were cute too. Good episode overall.

As for the rapist, I said it from day one. It's Beth, Al, and Spike with Sheridan unknowingly helping them. Its probably one big plot and he has various people helping him. I wouldn't be surprised if Chris is in it too. It's predictable and has been from day one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Actually, after reading Monday's recap...I have alleviated my recent doubts. I still think Sheridan is directly responsible for both of Fancy's rapes. It's no longer "too" obvious.

Notice how the attacker and Sheridan had the same photo (version) of Luis and Fancy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The devil isn't involved.

Those who I said it is, it is. You watch. I said it when all this began. It's not coincidence that around the same time we heard of a mysterious shadowy figure appearing in Harmony that the mags made mention of John Reilly returning as Al sometime this winter. All signs have pointed to this since day one. To me, it's all an extension of the Vendetta plot because, like that plot, it's one big effort by Al and his "team." By team, I mean Chris, Spike, Beth, etc. Sheridan is using this to her advantage and unknowingly helping them. Again, I said this like 3 months ago and got bashed by Rion and others for it. It's been predictable then since day one. These types of schemes always have Al written all over them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Could be but I hope not. That would destroy what little is left of Sheridan that I recognize. Whatever, the show is going off so I guess they can pull out all the stops and shouldn't care about character destruction. God knows, they have destroyed enough characters so may as well go for it all and consequences be damned I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Repost of my hypotheis

- Rape Speculation Thread - January 5

I wrote this before it was revealed this masked attacker was an umbrella storyline. I think Sheridan has a rapist working for her, and the masked person is watching Sheridan doing all of this stuff.

I think they have different agendas. Sheridan's agenda is to break up Luis and Fancy any way she can; Sheridan wants to hurt Fancy. The evil masked person's agenda is to destroy Luis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

wow, i guess hardcore, never-say-die PASSIONS fans will watch anything and call it "the best episode of the year."

even worse -- thanking JER?????

are you SURE friday's episode was written post-cancellation? what makes you think this is the beginning of the PSNS wrap-up?

whether it's alistair behind all this or not, it's pretty damned boring, repetitive, and ridiculous. AS ALWAYS, the question remains: why can't this man with UNLIMITED power and UNLIMITED money just blow everyone away in an INSTANT? instead, we have the all-powerful al hire incompetent goobers do do his nasty deeds. stupid JERk writing.

3 minutes of good stuff on the entire show: endora dancing around at the blue note.

and is anybody else bored and sick and tired of all the face-slapping on PASSIONS? the incessant assaults and rapes are bad enough, but the face-slapping (ususally followed by "you b-itch") is lame.

another typical JERk episode, and that's not a good thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought that the girl dancing behind Endora might have been her mom, but now I'm remembering that it was mentioned that Juliet Mill's daughter was going to be in those scenes. I guess it was her, and not Nicole's mom....although there were 2 blondes that I thought looked like Nicole...so maybe it was the other blonde who didn't have lines.

I loved those scenes, and I'm wondering if maybe Julian and Ivy's daughter Pretty was there. I know we thought we saw Julian seeing Endora, but maybe he was actually seeing Pretty, and she's been there all along and is one of the masked people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
    • Elements of it were silly, but it was a small price to pay to get Zas back. I should say there's a difference between in town and out of town returns. It's understandable for Roger to skulk around town in a bad wig and clown suit when he's in Springfield and running the risk of bumping in to people he knows.  Taking us out of town to find someone always has a short shelf life. Then it usually becomes about another character knowing X is alive but determined to keep them out of Springfield. Like Alan discovering Amish Reva. I don't know how long it went on, but it was probably twice as long as necessary.
    • Elizabeth Dennehy complained on the Locher Room about how ridiculous so much of the writing was for Roger's return. She laughed at so much of Roger's antics and how it was hard for her to take them seriously. Probably another reason she was fired as she didn't play the game.  
    • Only thing I enjoyed was Abby / Olivia, etc., and the addiction storyline. Otherwise, I could do without the season.
    • Right? Vanessa had a ball gown for every occasion.
    • Roger's return storyline may have been silly but Roger's return was what lead to GL's last golden era.  It was the combination of Roger's return and Robert Calhoun becoming EP that got GL to finally hit it's stride after some really bad years. It will always disappoint me that the ratings during Robert Calhoun's run didn't reflect the quality of the show.
    • He also gave some of the best episodes, like the episodes surrounding Doug's death. The problem with Days was that Ron had a horrible vision from he top. I don't feel the same for MVJ and nothing that has happened in all these months suggests she doesn't have a handle on the show. Now if it becomes an issue I'll acknowledge it, but I'm not seeing it so far.
    • Jean Hackney was awful and that lead to Ben's exit story which sucked. I liked Ben/Val together. Val's love for Ben was that of a grown woman moving on with her life and Ben's love for Val made him willingly decide to raise another man's children as his own.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy