Jump to content

Passions: Who is the serial killer?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

You watch the show. Read my post. Spike killed Phyllis. He admitted that. Grace was "killed" overseas by that operative who was disguised as a priest. JT was killed in Harmony by someone we probably know. Are they connected? Probably but it's not the same person doing them. That much is obivious. The operative who "killed" Grace wasn't around in Harmony to kill JT so there you go. If you want to say everything is connected, you are probably right but it's the not the same exact person doing every one of these crimes so you can't say it's a serial killer. It's one big plot being carried out by multiple people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I said the same thing in this thread. But let's for example say the personal responsible is...oh, Simone. If Simone is responsible for the deaths of Phyllis, JT, Grace, and the next victim, she can still be considered a serial killer even if a different person is committing the various murders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Really? I don't think so.

It's hard to root for someone who stands by and tortures her niece. It's hard to root for a character that had been destroyed. You may not like Fancy and that is fine but to sit there and say that people can sit there and enjoy this whole rape story if they root for Sheridan is laughable. I can't see justifying the story using that logic. Nothing justifies a story like this. It's disgusting and shameful but, if you want to enjoy it, you go right ahead. I don't understand how anyone can. They mystery aspect of it is ok (and even that will probably end up with a predictable outcome) but the rapes and attacks are too much, especially on a show that has made a habit out of featuring them and using them as plot points consistently for 2 years with very little fallout in terms of character development. I know I am going to get the 'Oh, people don't watch Passions for character development" excuse but that doesn't fly when some are sitting there saying they are liking the new direction Sheridan has gone in. That is character development is it not? It's poorly executed and had very little buildup but it still is so, therefore, that excuse doesn't fly with me. Every show has to have character development or how else is the audience going to care and invest?

For those who enjoy it, good for you. However, don't say that rooting for Sheridan will make this whole story bearable because for 98% of fans it won't. It's far to disgusting and appalling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Dallas peaked early, IMO. Maybe not a fair statement as I’m still making my way through the first half of its run, but I think it’s hard to argue to point that S3 into S4 was its high point. Back to Knots. Wrapping up “And Never Brought to Mind.” Greg’s introduction kinda took me by surprise. I low-key dreaded his arrival bc I know he very quickly gets to the center of the show, but even though they wasted no time connecting him with Mac, Abby, Gary, and Karen, it still feels like a gradual intro. The juxtaposition of the ending of the Chip story with the heating up Abby’s plotting is quite symbolic of the changes the show was going through. I absolutely cannot imagine Kenny and Ginger having any part in any of this. Yall, the Gary/Val piano theme that they pull out from time to time is my FAVORITE. I find myself humming it constantly.
    • Bloodshed is inevitable now. It’s another reason I’m glad Black people aren’t getting involved in these protests. As awful as this is, I keep reminding myself that 54 percent of Latino men voted for Trump. These people were put in harm’s way by members of their own communities and sometimes even members of their own families. Too many people decided to touch the stove.
    • Maybe I'm still in denial, but nothing about Neighbours' ongoing social media output gives the vibe of a show that's ending. In today's 'Roundup' video, Alan Fletcher referenced that production finishes in five weeks, but in all the show's posts the cast are as jovial and lighthearted as ever. Remarkably so for people who are about to lose their jobs.    Perhaps they're just putting a brave face on things, and I know they approached the previous axing with a positive attitude. Maybe putting an upbeat face on things is a collective way of showing potential backers that there's still life in the show? Or is it possible that they already know the show has been saved, and we'll get an announcement next month when filming wraps and the show 'rests'?   Does any of that make sense?!
    • A very good week for male eye candy on GH. New Michael is beautiful, Curtis's arms looked great in that polo shirt, Cody looks even more handsome with his new haircut AND we got Marco in swim shorts rocking his lovely bod and chest fur. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Yeah when Jamey Giddens did breakdowns for DAYS, he would sometimes state in tweets that specific things were his idea that he had pitched to Ron.
    • I don't, since they've clearly incorporated them into Tomas' storyline, and I happen to like his tattoos, but his jackets not fitting doesn't mean they're trying to cover his tattoos. The clothing overall isn't the issue; it's the fit. And I expect(ed) more from Jeresa Featherstone and her team. Very disappointed. He's the only male, overall, whose costume irritates me.
    • "And OMG, watching the scenes of Roger's return in comparison...the quality in the writing really nosedived. The stupid mask." Very much agreed.  Having Roger hide behind a mask for weeks/months, with it culminating with him swinging in on a vine at Blake/Phillip's wedding....geez.  So juvenile. IMO, Guiding Light never did a good job reintroducing major characters, either from the dead or elsewhere.  Masked balls = awful.  Amish = awful. When Reva was brought back from the dead, she should've just showed up in Springfield as Reva, and informed everyone that she had been gone for years because she felt like it.  She had a four-year fling with some dude who ended up dumping her due to disloyalty. Josh would be pissed and declare that their love is not *always* but *sometimes* and he'd act accordingly.  Her kids would hate her.   
    • Agreed. The Emmys next year are gonna be a pretty tough competition and I hope we get a Days sweep lol  Not only does Deidre deserve a nomination for these last few weeks, but I also think Paul Telfer, Raven Bowens, Carson Boatman, Dan Feuerriegel and Alison Sweeney have good chances as well.
    • It’s not about a lack of faith and trust in MVJ, it’s about a a lack of faith and trust in Ron Carlivati, who I think can be very sneaky and manipulative when he wants to be.  And, all that “He’s just a breakdown writer” talk never changed my mind about anything, because at Days, it was “just a breakdown writer” that gave us some of the worst episodes I’ve ever seen. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy