Members PhoenixRising05 Posted February 5, 2007 Members Share Posted February 5, 2007 You watch the show. Read my post. Spike killed Phyllis. He admitted that. Grace was "killed" overseas by that operative who was disguised as a priest. JT was killed in Harmony by someone we probably know. Are they connected? Probably but it's not the same person doing them. That much is obivious. The operative who "killed" Grace wasn't around in Harmony to kill JT so there you go. If you want to say everything is connected, you are probably right but it's the not the same exact person doing every one of these crimes so you can't say it's a serial killer. It's one big plot being carried out by multiple people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members RionPassions Posted February 5, 2007 Author Members Share Posted February 5, 2007 I said the same thing in this thread. But let's for example say the personal responsible is...oh, Simone. If Simone is responsible for the deaths of Phyllis, JT, Grace, and the next victim, she can still be considered a serial killer even if a different person is committing the various murders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members PhoenixRising05 Posted February 5, 2007 Members Share Posted February 5, 2007 Really? I don't think so. It's hard to root for someone who stands by and tortures her niece. It's hard to root for a character that had been destroyed. You may not like Fancy and that is fine but to sit there and say that people can sit there and enjoy this whole rape story if they root for Sheridan is laughable. I can't see justifying the story using that logic. Nothing justifies a story like this. It's disgusting and shameful but, if you want to enjoy it, you go right ahead. I don't understand how anyone can. They mystery aspect of it is ok (and even that will probably end up with a predictable outcome) but the rapes and attacks are too much, especially on a show that has made a habit out of featuring them and using them as plot points consistently for 2 years with very little fallout in terms of character development. I know I am going to get the 'Oh, people don't watch Passions for character development" excuse but that doesn't fly when some are sitting there saying they are liking the new direction Sheridan has gone in. That is character development is it not? It's poorly executed and had very little buildup but it still is so, therefore, that excuse doesn't fly with me. Every show has to have character development or how else is the audience going to care and invest? For those who enjoy it, good for you. However, don't say that rooting for Sheridan will make this whole story bearable because for 98% of fans it won't. It's far to disgusting and appalling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members PhoenixRising05 Posted February 5, 2007 Members Share Posted February 5, 2007 That isn't a serial killer. It's an orchestrator. She would be orchestrating the scheme but not directly doing it. Whatever the case, it doesn't make a difference. Passions isn't classifying this as a serial killer story and it really isn't so whatever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DaysnPassionsFan Posted February 6, 2007 Members Share Posted February 6, 2007 With everyone mentioning Precious, I would love for the finale to have the entire series as Precious' dream. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members EricaKane4life Posted February 6, 2007 Members Share Posted February 6, 2007 OH MY GOD! Did you guys just see the post that Kenny posted on another thread? I won't even tell you what it says but I'm going to be sh***** bricks if it's true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members KLN Posted February 6, 2007 Members Share Posted February 6, 2007 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.