Jump to content

Vee

Members
  • Posts

    34,824
  • Joined

Posts posted by Vee

  1. I like Andrea in these episodes, but I've only seen a little bit of Stern. It does make you wonder if they could ever rehabilitate Haiduk's character today, if only as mostly a talk-to personality for people. I also wonder if OLTL's choice to bring back Tina (a hapless teen player in the 70s and early 80s) had to do with this Y&R stint. I know they used two other Tinas in '84 to set up the Tina Lord story before getting Andrea back early in '85, but I also don't know if Andrea was super popular in her first OLTL run - you never hear much about that.

     

    I feel incredibly blessed to see this 70s stuff. An entirely different world. That Jill/beauty shop episode with the wall to wall character voiceovers is textbook classic soap.

     

    The stuff with Lester's Jack casually saying Patty is so naive and it's his main reason for marrying her, that he's going to sleep around anyway because that's who he is - you would never see a male lead talk like this on a soap today. He'd be killed in 13 weeks. Any man on soaps now who sleeps around is drugged or tricked into doing it in some way, or absolved in some weak fashion. Twice so for the women. People aren't really allowed to be conventionally human.

  2. There is no way "editing" can explain a lot of the closeness on GH. I've edited and I promise you, we don't do that. Nor is ABC rolling out money to allow GH to CGI people, lol. They would never give that money to these shows now. These people are in the same close space and IMO it is not safe. Yes, the show looks less embarrassing than B&B. But I think they're taking way too many risks and it's going to go bad. And for what - a rushed return for a show that needs a huge creative reset.

  3. My dude, you've been here the better part of 15 years angrily telling us how good these shows are as they each get cancelled and fall into further disrepair. They keep dying but without fail month after month, show after show you're still saying they're all great and we're super unfair. It's literally all you talk about, it's your favorite topic. What's the common denominator?

     

    We all care about these shows, but it's because we care about them that we can acknowledge failures and the fundamentally broken machine of daytime soap opera which has barely been evolved in two decades. Maybe you should ask yourself why the larger American audience doesn't listen to you and keep watching these wonderful underappreciated shows. Because if it was "just us" feeling this way, this genre would not be all but fùcking dead.

  4. 6 minutes ago, Gray Bunny said:

    Yup, I thought that too when I saw that. So freakin' happy about this :)

     

    Thirded, I suspected the same.


    Amusingly, the last remnants of the Bernie splinter left (loud on Twitter, small IRL) are blaming... Warren for today.

  5. 2 hours ago, kalbir said:

    Y&R hasn't done a very good job of building the next generation. I've been saying for years that an early 1980s style cast purge is needed.

     

    There are people that can be simply retooled, too. You turn Victoria into a matured ice queen riding herd on her son (cute, hairy hippie Reed, remember him?) like Kay/Jill over Phillip. Maybe you thaw her out with the right man later. Whoever plays her that you can get who's not Heinle, bc I have doubts HT would ever agree. You keep whatever Billy you can get and turn him back into a slightly older cad like Jack used to be, or keep him with Lily since those two have seemed to click with many different Billys IMO. If you put Billy and Victoria back together at some point they're both very different people. I don't know, there's a lot of ways to go.

     

    The younger veteran/middle aged people that seem the most spent to me atm include Nick and Sharon. I don't take anything either does seriously anymore, and Phyllis is a total afterthought. I don't know why Stafford bothered coming back because she does nothing worthwhile. If you're not going to put her back with Jack then I'm not interested unless Tognoni returns, and failing that, if you're not going to make her a villain again then what's the point? Same goes with Michael at this point, though tbh the show I'd do with those characters (having both Michael and Kevin come out as gay/bi) would never, ever happen. Anyway, I'm just spitballing.

  6. I'd probably pair up Kyle and Mariah and have another woman as a spoiler, along with Summer vixen'ing it up on the other end for Kyle. It helps that Mariah is far from an anodyne, vanilla heroine herself when written well. I don't know much else beyond that for those four just off the top of my head. I would definitely bring back Hilary for Devon. As for other duds, IMO Victoria only survives because of the many years of work Tom put in, and the Billy Miller stay of execution decree that gave her a fanbase ran out long ago. So you have to either beg Tom to return, find another strong actress for the role or write her out. Sure, fans will scream about losing 'their' Victoria or the possibility of her with Billy, but fùck 'em. When was the last time Victoria or Billy/Victoria gave this show a big return? You have to be willing to not accept surviving on crumbs of a dying audience. This show is not going to last another 10-20 years pandering to a handful of idiot fans on Twitter or Facebook. It has to be bold, and that means re-conceiving a lot of existing superficially 'popular' elements or characters.

  7. More like 70. And every time I remind people she can't act and Abby shouldn't be on the show anymore someone calls the cops. You write her off, and if you don't kill her (which I would legit consider at this point because the first 20 years of the character are a complete wash) then you re-conceive her in a few years' time with a new actress and with Abby focused not on business, not on screwball [!@#$%^&*] but on some sort of artistic profession, like one of the Brooks sisters. This at least allows you to differentiate her from Victoria, Summer, and any other Young White Woman X.

     

    And while we're on the subject of young leads, since I just said this to Darn I may as well repeat it here: Camryn Grimes has no story because IMO the 'groundbreaking story' of making her bisexual was at least in part a cynical ploy to keep her from being popular with actual male leads they found attractive and desirable while either the network, Sony or someone at the show clearly does not feel the same about Grimes. (This is similar to using the Amanda story as a sop to fans of color asking for Mishael Morgan back - Amanda neutralizes her popularity as Hilary.) Someone feels Grimes is not hot enough. So she gets sectioned off with a boring female love interest in the pat-ourselves-on-the-back social issue backburner story, when she should be in there with Mealor, etc. mixing it up. I'm a gay fan, I am all for Mariah being bisexual. I am not for her being the all-but-lesbian in the corner doing nothing. If you want this show to be the young and the restless, then make King, Mealor, Grimes, Morgan, and yes even poor Bryton get filthy with each other. You look back at what Terry Lester's Jack was doing and saying about himself being a manwhore in those '80s episodes in the vault and my god, what a difference. And I'm supposed to sit here today and pretend old Nick just got out of college, and watch 50 year old Phyllis fight Abby and her 120 failed stories over some hotels? Who cares? That demeans Stafford too. Am I supposed to live in suspense watching to see if Sharon Case finally changes her hair which she's had since before 9/11? Can y'all tell I had some coffee??

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy