B&B: July 2025 Spoilers

Followers

July 10, 2025Jul 10

Member

🚨Spoiler – Next Episode Short Clip: Hope arrives at the hospital. Steffy gives her news about Liam… #BoldandBeautiful #BoldandtheBeautiful pic.twitter.com/BlfR1emMaj
— SoapVisionX (@SoapVisionX) July 9, 2025

🚨Spoiler : Luna's fate is revealed. #BoldandBeautiful #BoldandtheBeautiful pic.twitter.com/vlFw7Ueteq
— SoapVisionX (@SoapVisionX) July 9, 2025

Edited July 10, 2025Jul 10 by janea4old

Quote

Replies 64
Views 6.7k
Created Jun 27Jun 27
Last Reply Jul 28Jul 28

Popular Days

Posted Images

July 11, 2025Jul 11

Member

Quote

July 11, 2025Jul 11

Member

@Maxim for next week 😉

Quote

July 12, 2025Jul 12

Member

10 hours ago, dragonflies said:

@Maxim for next week 😉

Nick and Brooke look beautiful in this photo. Thank you @dragonflies 🙏

Quote

July 13, 2025Jul 13

Member

Spoilers for this week, July 14-18

Credit: https://soapsspoilers.com/bold-and-beautiful/spoilers/week-july-14-28-2025-bill-runs-off-liam

Monday, July 14

Finn, Deacon and Sheila mourn the passing of Luna.

Tuesday, July 15

Bill waits impatiently as Grace operates on Liam.

Wednesday, July 16

Bridget and Finn admire Liam’s resilience after all he’s endured.

Thursday, July 17

Bill whisks an unconscious Liam away from the hospital.

Friday, July 18

Brooke, Taylor and Ridge vow to stay supportive and united, unaware of whether Liam will live or die.

Quote

July 14, 2025Jul 14

Member

#BoldandBeautiful
This week/next week pic.twitter.com/ddoR7smFn9
— Corinnelovessoaps (@soaplover5) July 14, 2025

Quote

July 14, 2025Jul 14

Member

6 minutes ago, dragonflies said:

My God Brooke looks like she just came out of year 2002. So stunning.

Quote

July 15, 2025Jul 15

Member

On 7/13/2025 at 5:05 PM, dragonflies said:

Thursday, July 17

Bill whisks an unconscious Liam away from the hospital.

Is he going to reunite Liam with Luna, who is being hidden by Li?

Quote

July 20, 2025Jul 20

Member

Spoiler pics from SOC

Quote

July 21, 2025Jul 21

Member

B&B Spoilers July 21 – 25: Steffy Gives Sheila Hope, Nick Makes a Romantic Overture to Brooke and Daphne Surprises Carterhttps://t.co/XaHSgekRoi #BoldandBeautiful #BoldandtheBeautiful pic.twitter.com/Gw2au6hHPQ
— Soaps Spoilers (Chrissi) 🇨🇦 (@SoapsSpoilers) July 21, 2025

Quote

July 21, 2025Jul 21

Member

This week's preview

Quote

July 25, 2025Jul 25

Member

Thorsten Kaye Interview about the Italy episodes

https://www.tvinsider.com/1204543/bold-and-the-beautiful-italy-episodes-details-thorsten-kaye-ridge-brooke-nick-exclusive/

Quote

July 25, 2025Jul 25

Member

Quote

July 25, 2025Jul 25

Member

@Maxim

Quote

July 26, 2025Jul 26

Member

11 hours ago, dragonflies said:

@Maxim

Thank you! 😍😍😍

Quote

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Followers

Go to topic listing

No registered users viewing this page.

Replies 64
Views 6.7k
Created Jun 27Jun 27
Last Reply Jul 28Jul 28

Popular Days

Posted Images

Guiding Light Discussion Thread

Well, "Reva Red" started before her PPD. I'm not even sure when it became a "thing", but the audience knew when Reva wore red, fireworks if some kind were gonna blow.
During her PPD, yes, when she wore red, it meant her symptoms were flaring. She threw a party for Justin to meet Dylan, and wore this expensive dress with some kind of cape--all in red.

By P.J. · 8 minutes ago8 min
Primetime Soaps

N/A

By TheyStartedOnSoaps · 9 minutes ago9 min
DAYS: April 2026 Discussion Thread

It's a little strange they chose Selejko as Liam's last name. I get that it adds a bit of interest to the character, but the Selejko family was on the show so long ago and were so inconsequential. I wouldn't mind it if Liam was Mike's son. It would help if Mike or Jeremy were on the canvas though lol.
I personally don't think the show knows what they are doing with Liam. He pops up every month or so and his character development is moving at a snail's pace. Considering how close Wayne and Deidre were I am surprised they haven't used Liam with Marlena at all.

By carolineg · 1 hour ago1 hr
GH: April 2026 Discussion Thread

Since Sidwell thinks Sonny killed his son it's a little tone deaf for Sonny's daughter to build a tennis court for Marco in the first place lol. Kristina didn't even know Marco.
I *think* Kristina has other investors besides Sonny for this project. I know she mentioned that ages ago when she started talking about opening the place. She made a whole business proposal and everything like a real adult lol.
Although I think it's fair to say Sonny bankrolls mostly everything else in Kristina's life. I laugh when she talks about opening Charlie's. Sure, she runs it, but her dad literally just handed it over to her for free.

By carolineg · 1 hour ago1 hr
DAYS: April 2026 Discussion Thread

Welcome back, Shawn! Another legacy character who should be featured much, much more.
It was nice to finally get some follow up with his storyline. Him and Jada were sweet today as he tried showing off for her lol they do have chemistry and I really hope that they get featured more. Somehow weaving Belle, and her drama, into this would be a good idea as well. I'm also interested in seeing what happens now that it looks like he may be getting out of the hospital soon. And he looked good too.
I also liked that Stephanie got a chance to express her feelings about everything that happened with Jeremy, first with Kayla, then with Marlena. It's always good to see her mix it up with other characters. And her and Marlena work well together. Even though I think they should've built it up a little more, I think that Stephanie's actions make sense based on everything that's happened to her lately. And I like that she's so determined to not let anyone have control over her anymore. After the last couple of years, she really could use that mentality lol besides the massive foreshadowing with the gun, Stephanie having that mindset could lead to something good happening for her and everybody around her. She definitely needs an alternative to Alex too, especially now that Jeremy's gone.
As for Johnny and Sophia... their scenes weren't bad but I probably would've liked them a lot more if they had involved any character other than Sophia. This is one character who certainly could've been sent packing before Jeremy.
The cliffhanger ending was good too.
Agreed.
That's the only way that I could see 'Liam being Mike's son' working.

By AbcNbc247 · 3 hours ago3 hr
DAYS: April 2026 Discussion Thread

They could do what they did with David and Valerie to make Eli's age work: say they reconnected years later away from Salem and hooked up, and she got pregnant but didn't tell him about the baby. They could've slotted this retconned reunion either between Michael T. Weiss and Roark Critchlow's runs (so 1990-1993) or after Mike and Carrie broke up offscreen (early/mid-2000s, which would put Liam's birth around the same time as Theo's onscreen one).

By Michael · 4 hours ago4 hr
DAYS: April 2026 Discussion Thread

As nice as it would've been to get more Hortons, it would've taken Jason47 or another Days historian/big fan to have to had written that reveal in order to make it work, without screwing up any timelines/ages, etc.
Mike and Ivy had a brief flirtation when Michael T. Weiss first debuted in the role in 1985. He was there for her when Pete and Melissa were on the run, and delivered her and Pete's baby too. But from what I saw, it seems like that teasing was pretty much forgotten about once Mike met Robin. A little while later, after Robin broke up with Mike, he started dating Ivy, but it was basically just a rebound for him. Eventually, Mike and Robin reunited and Ivy left town, I think.
You could've said that Ivy was pregnant at the time, but that would've made Liam older than Jeremy, and way older than Theo. And screwed up the timelines even more than they already were lol
So maybe it was a good thing that Liam didn't turn out to be a Horton. If anything, he should be in a triangle with Ari/Theo, which could also weave in Gabi/Philip, and their drama.

By AbcNbc247 · 4 hours ago4 hr
The Politics Thread

By Maxim · 4 hours ago4 hr
The Politics Thread

The Supreme Court decision was 6-3.

The three dissenters were Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, and Ketanji Brown Jackson.
https://www.scotusblog.com/2026/04/in-major-voting-rights-act-case-supreme-court-strikes-down-redistricting-map-challenged-as-racia/

In a somber tone, Kagan read a summary of her 48-page dissent from the bench – a signal of her strong disagreement with the majority’s ruling. “The Voting Rights Act,” she wrote “is—or, now more accurately, was—‘one of the most consequential, efficacious, and amply justified exercises of federal legislative power in our Nation’s history.’ It was born of the literal blood of Union soldiers and civil rights marchers. It ushered in awe-inspiring change, bringing this Nation closer to fulfilling the ideals of democracy and racial equality.” And only Congress, Kagan argued, can “say it is no longer needed—not the Members of this Court.”
But the requirements that the court imposes on Wednesday, Kagan contended, “will effectively insulate any practice, including any districting scheme, said by a State to have any race-neutral justification. That justification can sound in traditional districting criteria, or else can sound in politics and partisanship. As to the latter, the State need do nothing more than announce a partisan gerrymander,” she said. “Assuming the State has left behind no smoking-gun evidence of a race-based motive (an almost fanciful prospect), Section 2 will play no role.”
Kagan rejected Alito’s contention that the majority had merely made “updates” to the Gingles framework, arguing instead that the majority’s changes “eviscerate the law, so that it will not remedy even” classic cases of vote dilution. “Without a basis in Section 2’s text or the Constitution,” Kagan argued, “the majority formulates new proof requirements for plaintiffs alleging vote dilution.” The new requirements that the majority imposes, Kagan said, “leverage two features of modern political life: that racial identity and party preference are often linked and that politicians have free rein to adopt partisan gerrymanders.”
Kagan also emphasized that when Congress amended Section 2 of the VRA in 1982, it did so specifically to override the Supreme Court’s decision holding that Section 2 prohibited only intentional discrimination. “It made sure instead,” Kagan wrote, as this court recently explained, “that Section 2 would ‘turn[] on the presence of discriminatory effects.’” “Today’s decision,” Kagan argued, “returns Section 2 to what it was” before the 1982 amendment. “Now, as then, vote-dilution plaintiffs will have to show more than vote dilution: They will have to show, as well, race-based motive. Now, as then, that requirement will make success in their suits nearly impossible.”
In another sign of her disagreement with the majority’s decision, Kagan omitted the traditional “respectfully” from her conclusion, writing only, “I dissent.”

By janea4old · 4 hours ago4 hr
The Politics Thread

By janea4old · 5 hours ago5 hr

B&B: July 2025 Spoilers

Featured Replies

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Posted Images

Join the conversation

Recently Browsing 0

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Posted Images

Recent Posts

Guiding Light Discussion Thread

Primetime Soaps

DAYS: April 2026 Discussion Thread

GH: April 2026 Discussion Thread

DAYS: April 2026 Discussion Thread

DAYS: April 2026 Discussion Thread

DAYS: April 2026 Discussion Thread

The Politics Thread

The Politics Thread

The Politics Thread

Important Information

Account

Navigation

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)

Chrome (Desktop)

Safari (iOS 16.4+)

Safari (macOS)

Edge (Android)

Edge (Desktop)

Firefox (Android)

Firefox (Desktop)