Jump to content

ALL: Couple vs SUPER Couple?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I knew I had another cite. 

Maloney, M., & Bell, L. P. (2012). The Young and Restless Life 0f William J. Bell. Sourcebooks, Inc. [beginning on pg. 70]


    Bill encouraged Bill and Susan's romance off camera, but he couldn't come up with enough obstacles to keep Doug and Julie apart on screen, not the least of which was having Doug marry Julie's mother, Addie! In fact, Susan Seaforth Hayes suspects that if Bill hadn't left the show after launching Y&R that Doug & Julie's October 1, 1976, marriage would never have taken place.
    "In retrospect, he was right not to marry us," Seaforth Hayes adds. "Only dull things happen to married people on soap operas."
    "Bill never would have married us," her husband concurs.
    The Hayeses are correct about Bill's feelings on wedded bliss and his characters. "I don't like marriages," Bill wrote in his story projection for DAYS in 1967. "That is, in serials," he hastened to clarify. "Too often, it closes doors rather than opens them."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Cliff and Nina weren't a couple or a supercouple.  They were just Agnes Nixon and Wisner Washam messing with our heads for a decade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I love that whole book that Lee Bell had Michael J. Maloney write. My very strong impression from it is that Bill Bell was very confident in his specific ideas about many things & he was not going to be having his mind changed about them. 

For one specific example, which I absolutely object to, Bell is said to have thought the sex between Bill Horton & Laura Spencer that night at the hospital when he went to her, drunk, was consensual. I remember watching Bill rape Laura. I only wish I had access to the episode, although I've said nothing would get me to re-watch it, but, maybe that statement would. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Bill may have stated he didn't like marriages but on DOOL,Y&R and B&B, he married off all the major couples.

Victor,Ashley, Nikki, Jack had several marriages under his tenure.

So I still don't get why Doug and Julie were a special exception. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I see what you're saying, completely. Just have no clue. Pulling an idea out of thin air, what if it was a philosophy he had with them them, early ya know, but abandoned because the pressure to have weddings was just too great? But, that is strictly speculation. Like 'if you can't beat 'em enjoy it'?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't get it either, but in a way, it made sense for Doug and for Julie.  As wonderful as the Hayeses were together - as I've said elsewhere, they're probably the only soap couple who, once they were wed, never should've been split up - I think they must've been PHENOMENAL when they weren't.  SSH's face and eyes were made for the close-up, so seeing the ache and the longing register every time she wanted to be next to Doug but couldn't...?  And all Bill Hayes needed to do in order to express Doug's need for Julie was to sing some song like "The Look of Love," and I'll bet viewers back then ate this [!@#$%^&*] up.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Couldn't also be that people grow and change creatively, and the way Mr. Bell felt about weddings in the 1976, was not the same way that he felt in 1986?

“A foolish adherence to consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds” Ralph Waldo Emerson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But, marriages on the Young and the Restless and the Bold and the Beautiful did not last long.

B&B brakes couples up too fast for anyone to care.

On Y&R for example Victor and Nikki have been a super couple for nearly 45 years but they've only actually been married for less than 20.  Victor started cheating on Nikki just one year into the marriage.

And for characters like Ashley, she got married so frequently most of her pairings I don't care about outside of Victor and maybe Brad.

I think ABC, specifically General Hospital is the best at super couples because they're given years to build momentum on screen.

Edited by Planet Soap
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

We saw in the 1980s and 1990s Ratings threads that Days had a ratings drop in the last year and a half of the supercouple era (Spring 1989 to Fall 1990). Lots of factors in play I think: viewers getting tired of the supercouple and action/adventure trends, head writer change from Leah Laiman to Anne Howard Bailey then Richard J. Allen and Anne Schoettle, lead-in change from Scrabble to Generations, time slot rival Y&R being #1 by a large margin, time slot rival B&B showing growth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wow, @kalbirthat's a lot of reasons! You might even say multi-layered, also multi-faceted. Given how fans can grow weary of too much of one thing, even if it's a good thing, with all of the rest of that going on, it's no wonder DAYS fell down in the ratings. I will never stop wishing that everyone had taken their half hour shows & tucked them in, rather than make them be the lead-in. That goes for Generations & also The City & PC! Those guys never had a fighting chance. They were doomed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

Couple:  Two people that exist well on their own or together storywise.  And if broken up, can co exist without the whole will they or won't they....and can be paired up with other people in equally popular couplings.

Supercouples: To me, a kiss of death in terms of plot and character development.  They cease to exist as an individual character.  Only way to pair them with others successfully if one of the two leaves the canvas.

Examples of super couples:

 

1) Luke and Laura

2) Greg and Jenny

3) Tad and Dixie

4) Josh and Reva

5) Bo and Hope

 

Examples of couples:

 

1) Adam and Brooke (AMC)

2) Tom and Erica (AMC)

3) Ed and Holly (GL)

4) Lisa and Bob (ATWT)

5) Paul and Lauren (Y & R)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • What consequences are there to suffer? He didnt commit any crime and everyone already hates him. If anything this will set back the progress he's made with Naomi
    • Yes and I also loved how she focused on Chelsea and Naomi when she spilled Bill's involvement in all of this.
    • Danny: Don't drink it. Just hold it. Rocco drinks three laced cups.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • OH, I AM.   And it looks like it's a pretty good episode so I might watch later on this weekend after work cuz I see a lot of scenes with people I actually like. Very happy to see Rocco/Danny appear to be getting story, too. 
    • I do agree that a revival of EON would work, if it doesn't fall into doing all of the typical soap opera tropes... which it became guilty of in the final few years of the show with the over abundance of Raven/Sky at the expense of the actual detectives, police, etc. And I know it was mentioned earlier that Raven had lost any true connections on the show with the death of her on screen mother, and the loss of April/Draper/Deborah.. and I do agree with that. I actually thought the show would have done something with the Shelley character that could have connected her to the Raven character.  There were a few scenes where the two would have scenes and size one another up before they would go their separate ways.. so I assumed perhaps they would have been revealed as half-siblings and/or perhaps cousins.  Alas.. not to be.
    • It definitely flowed beautifully. So much that I was annoyed when Vanessa/Doug because I wanted to get back to the party. I know it was intentional to build up tension and suspense. It worked. lol. I'm glad it was there in hingsight because it gave us that great conversation between Doug and Vanessa. Foreshadowing? And yesss!!! This episode was sooo old school soap giving beat after beat after beat leading up to the unveiling of Eva as Ted's daughter. And we still have plenty of fallout/aftereffects to work through.   Speaking of...Bill, Bill, Bill lol. Good to have confirmation HE was the scary lawyer.   I'm sure I will have a busy Monday, but I can't wait for it. I don't know what I'm looking forward to more. Probably Anita vs Silk Press Sheila tbh. And yes, I feel they will be matching each other 'blow for blow.' 
    • And if they go there, it could also be tied to Johnny completely cutting him off, possibly going to work for Titan, etc.
    • @AbcNbc247 maybe it is just that they've gone to that well too often, and I don't like when DAYS goes dark, but I'm OK with EJ abusing drugs, and just skipping the whole sobriety part. Side note: experiencing hallucinations of my son killing me would be enough for me to never want to take a pill again.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Part of the reason that Courtney worked at OLTL was because the show had an actual character for her to play.  One that was somewhat different than her character on AW, and after the way she was treated over at AW.. it had to have been nice to be courted onto a new soap that actually valued your contributions.  
    • I figured the "long" was already implied 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy