Jump to content

Sisters Discussion Thread


soapfan770

Recommended Posts

  • Members

This really does sum everything up better than I could have. The story was truly repulsive, but what I didn't appreciate until now was the lost opportunities. And I realize you are right in that Georgie should have never wanted to reconcile with John. I think they only did so as a last-minute apology to fans. 

I did like Alex and Big Al, but they had gotten so far away from what had initially made Alex special as a character. They diluted all of the sisters. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Remember, in the final season, when Alex reunited with her college sweetheart, played by AMC's Nicolas Surovy (ex-Mike Roy), and DAYS' Paul Kersey (ex-Alan Harris) in flashback?  Basically, they were supposed to elope, but he left town (and left her a "Dear John" note scribbled on a torn piece of notebook paper) because he'd been involved in a campus protest that killed a security guard.  Well, I tried watching that episode again this morning, and I say "tried," because, the whole time, I kept thinking, This is not an Alex story.  This is a Teddy story.  Alex would never have given a poetry-writing hippie the time of day.  Do you even KNOW your damn characters anymore, Cowen & Lipman?

I've been watching "Sisters" again this past week on the WBTV Primetime Soaps channel, and...sigh...I think I made a big mistake, lol. 

I never thought "Sisters" was brilliant.  I know it WANTED to be brilliant.  Even as an adolescent, however, I felt there was too much camp and cheese in the writing.  Still, I loved the chemistry among the leads, and I especially loved the flashbacks and the moments when the four sisters would interact with their younger selves.

Unfortunately, what I loved about the show when I was in junior high and high school, is what irritates me about it today.  Like I said, I never thought "Sisters" was brilliant; but, damn, I didn't realize there was so much ridiculous, unearned melodrama even in the FIRST half of the show's run, when Cowen & Lipman supposedly had a better grasp on their characters and their tone.  And while the flashbacks and such might've been a selling point in the beginning, the novelty overstays its welcome rather quickly; and as a matter of fact, those moments aren't as illuminating as we were supposed to think they were.

I agree.  Just as they owed whatever fans were still watching by that point a big, fat thank you for putting up with 2-3 seasons of dark, depressing writing that did nothing except make their characters unlikable (and Sela Ward an Emmy winner).

One of the biggest problems that I've had with this latest re-watch is that I still don't understand how we got from Trevor Whitsig being just your normal, wisecracking kid to "Trevor W.: Portrait of a Teenage A$$hole."  All of a sudden, he's skipping school, drinking, doing drugs, fighting with his parents and kid brother, having unprotected sex with older women...but why?  If it's due to feeling overshadowed by Evan's leukemia, then he's about two seasons too late. 

And what's REALLY frustrating is how the story denies us what we need most (aside from the family working through their issues with therapy): that moment when Trevor finally breaks down and tells John and Georgie (and us) just what the hell is going on with him.  Over and over, they beg him to open up and tell them what's wrong, but he never does.  Instead, he just comes home, goes back to school (off-screen) and then decides to join the military.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As a kid, I was sometimes very moved by the flashbacks (there was an early Thanksgiving episode in particular, or one around the time of Evan's cancer diagnosis), even by the silly moments like Teddy joining a protest and saying, "I don't want to take a trip on the SS censorship." I thought the girl who played a young Georgie was especially good. The show losing those elements after the first few seasons made it feel colder to me, less easy to invest in. Yet I am not sure if I would find these elements cloying and unearned now.

You're right about the Trevor story. They could have had a better buildup, had him react to the whole fiasco with Georgie caring Frankie's baby and George threatening to sue for custody, but they never did. They just seemed to realize they had run out of story for Georgie and went haywire. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What I loved about the show was that the first two or three seasons reminded me a spoof of a primetime soap opera with the close knit family and all the various men that came and went from the sisters lives.  

When the show veered into the darker subject matter, it lost the charm/whimsy of the earlier seasons.

In regards to the Georgie/John story... I remember the high school or college reunion where John was wanting to get back together with Georgie because he realized how badly he was treating her.. and she turned him down flat because she was 'in love' with the Dr.   I think the final episode where the two looked to be taking the first step toward getting back together was a good ending.  Since she did push away her husband and realized once she was single that she really threw away her marriage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would also say in relation to John and Georgie that it's just icky to tell a molestation story and then lead into the Caspian story. What kind of message does that send? Yeesh. Inevitably, viewers are going to focus on Georgie's obsession with Caspian and the destruction of her marriage, so the viewers are going to be angry with her and forget about the molestation/Caspian's actions. The only thing I can think of is that perhaps they were trying to give Kalember an award worthy story a la Ward and it backfired spectacularly. 

The flashbacks were always hit or miss for me. I just want to know what went so wrong with the penultimate season. From what I remember, it felt like the quality of the fifth season dropped immensely. Is my memory so wrong? Was the fourth season not as good as I remember?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Not necessarily. 

I apologize for sounding like a broken record, but I do believe NBC pressured Cowen, Lipman and the rest of the "Sisters" team into coming up with more "provocative" storylines, because they wanted to broaden the show's appeal.  I think that's why the fifth season lapses into crime drama, with the simultaneous sting operations being conducted on Dr. Caspian and Daniel Albright respectively.  (I still don't know why Teddy drew Lucky into her plan to bring down Falconer's killers, except I guess they were testing the waters for a Lucky/Teddy relationship, since it was clear that Julianne Phillips was leaving the show and that Frankie and Lucky had gone nowhere as a couple).  The previous season had some darker storylines as well - Cat's rape, Reed and Kirby's experience with a religious cult, Trevor's...whatever the hell that was - but they're nowhere near as off-putting as what we get in Season Five (although Trevor's storyline certainly comes close).

Unfortunately, NBC misjudged Cowen and Lipman's ability to handle heavier, more soap operatic material.  That's why I tend to regard the final season as a course correction of sorts, as well as one, long, massive apology to whatever remained of the audience for having to put up with two seasons of horrendously bleak storytelling.  There's still some heaviness - particularly, at the start of the season, with Teddy's carjacking and subsequent head trauma - but the overall tone is much, much lighter.  

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree!

Georgie was much too smart to allow a slimy therapist to lead her to believe her father was a pedophile based on one, ambiguous memory.  And when poor Beatrice is reduced to defending her cheating bastard of a husband against charges like those, you know we've officially entered the Twilight Zone.

 

In theory, I like the idea of there being a long-lost Reed sibling; and I guess that sibling would've had to be another sister since, after all, the show was called "Sisters."  But I have to say...in retrospect...I kind of wish Charley had been male instead.  Even if he couldn't have been anything other than a recurring character, I think the Reed sisters having a brother in their lives might've been fun to explore.  (Plus, it would've been ironic, since Thomas Reed had always wanted a son).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The Georgie/Caspian thing reminded me of making Eden's rapist her gynaecologist on Santa Barbara. The one who examined her after the rape. Who okayed that? A bunch of idiots. Same thing here.  I think what happened is that they saw that the rape storyline got Sela Ward the emmy. Instead of focusing on Ward's talent, the producers and/or NBC focused on the sexual violence aspect and decided to use that for another character to get attention. I think it's as crass and as sexist as that. Having watched how they handled stories on QAF, it wouldn't surprise me if that was the producers' thinking.

Speaking of molestation, I just looked into the last season and discovered what happens with Teddy's character. UGH. Of all actors.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

At the 47:30 mark of this interview Cowen and Lipman admit that the Georgie/Caspian/son story was the death knell for the series: 

Please register in order to view this content

 

Edited by chrisml
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks. I'm glad they see it.

I don't really remember the inbreeding part of the show being an issue later on - unless they mean the various teases of Teddy/Mitch. I think Georgie slept with someone Teddy's daughter had been with but I may be wrong as I had already quit by then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I'm glad, too.  I'm especially glad that they've acknowledged how out of character it all was for Georgie, John and Trevor, because it was.  At least, it was, the way it all was set up.  As I've said before, there wasn't enough motivation for Trevor to lash out at his parents like he did; and Georgie was much too smart to fall for someone as obvious as Dr. Caspian.

On the one hand, I do agree that the longer any series runs, the harder it becomes to maintain the quality of the writing or the integrity of the characters.  But I also blame Cowen and Lipman here, because, aside from Teddy and maybe Alex, I don't think the four leading characters were well-developed.  After awhile, it seems like stories are thrust upon them, rather than generating from them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The Georgie story made sense up to the Dr. Caspian plot.   She was the peacemaker, she was the one to cover up her mother's alcoholism, she was the one that kept the family together.

She had this need to always be the one for others to depend on, and realistically having to deal with her husband being unemployed, her son's cancer, and then her other son's issues caused Georgie to break.  

I actually think Georgie's story was in character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members
Posted (edited)

Please register in order to view this content

Alex probably had the best love interests of any of the sisters. I liked all of them (I think I liked Victor the most, maybe because the actor was cute).

The Trevor story was a tough watch, and not the best buildup, but I agree most of it made sense for Georgie.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the relationship that I enjoyed the most of any characters on "Sisters" was Truman and Beatrice's.  I feel like they gave a lot of people hope.  Plus, it was especially sweet to see Bea discover what love REALLY was after being mistreated for so long by Thomas.  I just hate that her and Truman's love story had to end with a depressing storyline about Alzheimer's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • No idea if this one had ever been up before or what the exact date is, but it's always good to look at/save the new AMC content while you can. If you're here for the drama there is some delirium with Adam and Erica about 10-12 minutes in.

      Please register in order to view this content

      @Vee @Jonathan @Maxim @All My Shadows @alwaysAMC @Contessa Donatella @Soaplovers @DemetriKane @dragonflies @AMCOLTLLover @Khan @Paul Raven @slick jones @Wendy @DeeVee @j swift @EricMontreal22 @AmandainNC28655 @Wilsoky @Franko @Liberty City @robbwolff @Soapsuds @soapfan770 @FrenchFan
    • I think there's a story to tell in someone who always believed in honesty and integrity being emmeshed in so many lies, but I agree that it wasn't very well laid out over the last few months. I think if I was more invested in Lois, I would have more of an issue than I do. Few can hold up against Jane. This is one of those cases where I think mentioning who already switched babies or have long-lost children would just take away from the fallout. If Lulu wants to drag Brook Lyn for hypocrisy there is probably still time (if the show bothers). I don't think anyone would claim these are the best GH episodes ever. It may be very lowered expectations at play. But I do think that scenes like yesterdays were some of Tracy's best, as she is a character who is often not allowed that type of moment.
    • You would think that, wouldn't you? I'd almost think they needed the money to get Robert Newman back, but they also had to know Larkin wasn't going to stick around and play second banana either. I don't get what the writers thought they were doing with Calla. Long liked using actors from Texas, but other than Alex/Bev McKinsey, the characters she wrote for them seemed blah.
    • Bo has a bad history with kids named Zach. (too soon?)
    • Christie said in her interview this week that she recently started taking acting classes again, and has been doing some work in England, so that helped her to jump into Carrie for this (as well as it being all so familiar, it really was home.)
    • Andrea Barber aka Kimmy Gibbler did have a few scenes with Drake too, when he first came on. Christie came in the middle of that storyline 
    • Carrie, as played by Andrea Barber, was at Bo & Hope's wedding. She was the flower girl. The ringbearer was Zachary Parker, the little boy that Megan tried to pass off as her and Bo's son. Andrea's Carrie was at Tony & Anna's real wedding (Aug. 5, 1985). She appeared for the last time on March 21, 1986. Christie's Carrie debuted on April 14, 1986. It appears that Carrie remained in Salem, just off-screen, during that near-month. Christie picked up with what Andrea had been playing, apprehension over John.
    • I don't think she is. I think she just created some really boring characters and for some reason doesn't know what to do with them.  But let's say that she is being force to write these characters that she doesn't like or want to write for.......that's a really bad sign that the creator of the show is being told what to do from the very beginning.  With so many EPs, I was worried there could be too many cooks in the kitchen, too many people giving notes - all those EPs are representing companies who have a stake in the show.    Canada continues to be one episode ahead. Thursday's US episode is another lacklustre episode, even with Leslie in it.  We'll see if Friday or Monday's episode in Canada will be a repeat. 
    • Like a lot of soaps, once relatives left, they kinda dropped off the face of the earth and out of conversations. I don't know why writers do that. If they just don't want to confuse viewers, or don't think it matters, or want the liberty kind of revise history to make their stories work. After Josh left in '84, he's barely mentioned. Even when Billy's railing against Kyle and refusing to accept him, it'd be the most natural thing in the world to say "Kyle's NOT by brother, JOSH is!" and I don't think he ever really says that.  The only writer I can recall who didn't do that is Doug Marland on ATWT. 
    • IIRC, there is a line during this time period where Reva says something like Marah is her first-born child, which fans were not thrilled with.  Dylan makes a few appearances through the rest of the show (and a much later recast that isn't really worth talking about, with a face that is familiar to you). He will make one briefly during 1997, if you get that far.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy