Members Contessa Donatella Posted April 30, 2024 Members Share Posted April 30, 2024 During her latest day in court, Haley changed her plea to no contest on one DUI and in exchange, the district attorney dropped the second DUI charge along with the hit-and-run charge. So, it could have been worse. https://www.justjared.com/2024/04/29/general-hospital-actress-haley-pullos-receives-jail-time-following-dui-arrest/?=morehere https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13364051/General-Hospital-star-Haley-Pullos-months-jail-DUI-crash.html 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members AMCOLTLLover Posted April 30, 2024 Members Share Posted April 30, 2024 Got away lightly if u ask me and I know no one asked lol 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Contessa Donatella Posted April 30, 2024 Author Members Share Posted April 30, 2024 You're only speaking the truth! Getting the judge to dismiss the hit-and-run?!!! Imagine. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Maxim Posted April 30, 2024 Members Share Posted April 30, 2024 Having lost a relative to a person that was driving under the influence - 3 months is nothing. This is a joke of a ruling. If it was up to me - no less than a year. People should think twice before they put others' lives in risk with their behavior. .08 BAC is WELL enough to impair. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members JAS0N47 Posted May 1, 2024 Members Share Posted May 1, 2024 Reading the whole story, the hit-and-run part of the charge was actually for her hitting a parked car just before she got into the accident, so it wasn't that she hit the injured driver and then ran. She couldn't have since her car was destroyed. "Also dismissed was a hit-and-run charge resulting from Pullos running into a parked car just before the freeway crash. But though prosecutors dropped that count, she will still have to pay restitution to the owner of the car she damaged." 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Contessa Donatella Posted May 1, 2024 Author Members Share Posted May 1, 2024 (edited) After the hit-and-run she proceeded to drive on the freeway at an extreme speed, lost control & her car jumped a 2 foot barrier & was then driving the wrong way toward oncoming traffic. One car swerved to avoid her & the car immediately behind was the car she hit & both her car & that car were destroyed then. Her car had to be moving at a high speed to create the final accident. I'm just spit-balling here but perhaps the hit-and-run was the first car, which swerved but was hit a glancing blow. There seems to be a considerable problem in this late reporting of what actually happened. Edited May 1, 2024 by Contessa Donatella make clear 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members janea4old Posted May 1, 2024 Members Share Posted May 1, 2024 (edited) No. What Jason said is what was reported from last year. The first accident (the hit-and-run) where she hit the parked car, was on the city streets of Pasadena a little while before she entered the freeway. The first car wasn't on the freeway at all. The only confusion in reporting is from outlets rushing to give updates on her sentencing deal, without actually reading the original reports. When emergency responders (police/ambulance/etc) arrived at the at the scene of the freeway accident, they extricated her and attended to her, attended to the driver whose vehicle she crashed into, and the destroyed vehicles. She was brought to the hospital etc. At some point later that night/day, or within a few minutes/hours/days later, the police realized she'd hit the first car in a completely separate incident just before she entered the freeway. So then they charged her with both accidents. But yeah the original reports always said the first vehicle she hit was stationary or parked. Edited May 1, 2024 by janea4old 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Contessa Donatella Posted May 1, 2024 Author Members Share Posted May 1, 2024 I have no problem at all with this description of events regarding the hit-and-run. My point was that her car was not disabled at that point & I gave an accurate description of the wrong way, head-on crash which was the most serious part of the entire thing. If that is cleared up now, I am fine with how it stands. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.