Jump to content

DAYS: Jack Spoiler


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Frankie and Jennifer are not a new couple created by JER. Those two have a clear past and were very popular with fans at the time. It was Jennifer's first love and it was such an innocent first love storyline. It was great and many people loved that.

Personally I hated when all the vets were being killed by the stalker, but the story generated buzz that the show needed and it was must see viewing. I never wrote the show about wanting my vets back, and did get angry about some of them, and secretly I prayed for them to come back to the show. I think if he had killed a few vets and left them dead fans would have learned to accept, I would have. I mean it is a fact of life that bad things happen to all people in life.

But the whole story was negated with the Captive Island story. The concept was a good one but it was poorly executed. The tension that it was creating in the show with all the couples beging torn apart was good, but the explanation of how all the things happened was too farfetched. Then before he could establish the new "contention" relationships the people were moved - some back home to Salem, some to the castle, etc. That is when the story really lost any ground it might have had. I don't know what the reasoning was - if it was disgruntled fan bases or what.

John's drug storyline was really bad. I really liked the quadrangle it set up with Roman, John, Kate, and Marlena, but even it was abandoned too quickly for the Alex North story. If they wanted to bring Wayne back, why not go ahead and make him Roman. I love Josh Taylor but he is not Roman. Viewers know these characters, and that the quadrangle would have been better if it had further been explored esp. with Wayne as Roman. The Alex North character has no history with fans at all, and even though they have created a history with Marlena it is still not as familiar to fans as the Roman and Marlena history. The flashbacks would have worked much better with them as Roman & Marlena.

I personally think JER has set up some good stories right now. I think some of the biggest weaknesses of the show is the day to day writing of JER's stories. He has reinvented the Bo/Hope/Billie story with the addition of Chelsea as the "bitch" in the story and showing Billie as the loving mother trying to protect her daughter. It gives Billie a better reason for going after Bo. There is some room for improvement, but there is on every show.

I like Frankie and Jennifer alot. I think the biggest problem with it as well as the Austin/Carrie/Lucas/Sammi is that they are too much of Island stories - off to themselves and away from all the other goings on in town. The writers need to get some overlapping characters from other stories involved, and let the stories blend more.

I like Matthew Ashford and don't get me wrong he is one of my faves but personally I hope he stays dead this time. I wished that had even been JER's mindset in it. I would have liked to seen it played out to full affect. Jack has died now 3 times and another resurrection is just too many for me. I think it would have been great to have let Jack gone on and even played up more that Jack wanted Jenn to move on. I love the way he moved the romance along and gave them permission. It was very touching and knowing that they have Jack's permission is great. Then once Frankie and Jennifer are together and then some friction can be created for them, but having Jack return I just don't think is going to be the best idea this time.

But overall I think JER has set things up pretty well right now, and I am enjoying it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

See, but they don't have to say it. Like Jane1978 said, majorly paraphrasing, if they'd just write interesting alternatives they could generate new fans to offset the irritated old ones. But they don't. And to be honest, I think they get off on irritating fanbases as much as they try to cater to them. There really is no cause to kill Jack a third time, y'know?

And you mention mixing up couples, but I don't see them doing that. From my perspective it's just delaying the inevitable. They're trying to give each fanbase their own little piece of the show to enjoy, sadly isolating characters from one another. They kill any potential alternative as it's forming (by, say, having dead Zack talk to Shawn and Belle, lest we get scared and think that Mimi could have an outside shot). And their movements into these hypothetically mixed-up couples are very extreme, weird, and, in a couple cases, imho, just not very good (amesia? corporate takeover?!). For the most part they've avoided the kind of permanent relationship-ending arguments that might give fans of certain couples closure, or at least a reason to believe the show's not simply screwing with them for sport. I mean, why not show people actually fall out of love instead of always having circumstances split them up?

That said, part of the show is very good. I think the Belle/Mimi/Shawn stuff is awesome, because all three are flawed and, for the most part, making their own decisions. Jen and Frankie bore the hell out of me, but it's not necessarily bad. Hope/Bo/Billie could be much worse.

Bottom line, I could totally get into some new couplings, and if they were actually trying to do that then I'd be more "shut up fanbases, you aren't true fans" about it (maybe minus the true fans part, 'cause that's a whole 'nother issue). Until they go that route, though, I'm more apt to blast the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • https://www.nzherald.co.nz/lifestyle/shortland-street-fears-speculation-grows-about-shows-future-amid-industry-struggles/T2GECWXTI5AD3AMEV46YYYUE6E/ Still a big cloud over whether the show will get another year.
    • I had hoped they'd pair her with Michael Knight. They had a nice chemistry and he's been one of the better random castings on GH. When it comes to Gio, I found the scenes with Dante to be overdone. It's obvious they're trying to set up conflict for the reveal but I don't think that was needed. It actually made me less excited for the reveal and killed any interest I had in Dante and Gio forming a bond.
    • He also lost the woman he was going to marry, under very sudden circumstances. They are probably surprised Rena has wanted to stay. I think Lois works OK in her current capacity, if they allowed her to have more of a point of view, a bit more life of her own, and not just the reason for Gio's paternity being hidden. The character always felt very thin to me and on paper this dynamic with Tracy, Brook Lyn, Gio, visits from Gloria could be better for her than how overly centered she was on the canvas the first time around. But as of now she could be better used.  Somehow the show that was revived due to supercouples seems completely alien to romance. The older cast has this hardest but even with tiers who are younger or middle-aged, they've really dragged their feet about Liz and Lucky, they have contorted themselves in trying to figure out how to pair a man with Joss, Kai and Trina barely get focus...and others I struggle to remember. They also blew up Sasha/Cody so now I guess we're meant to be waiting to see if she finds true love with Jason? The show is so hesitant and when you are this hesitant it means you are incapable of writing romance.
    • I agree.  Rena doesn't seem to mind the lighter workload and seems happy though. Strangely, a lot of the veteran cast are without viable love interests-Sonny, Nina, Lois, Jason, Tracy, Alexis, Carly (Brennan doesn't count).  The show lacks serious interest in romance.
    • I just can't wait until next week when we can go back to a full weeks worth of episodes. 3 episodes and a mid-week gap has been so difficult to deal with, especially in light of how good the show is.
    • I always hoped they'd change Parker's paternity back to Phillip.  I guess it doesn't matter since Chloe is off the show currently.  I don't recall Holly or Maggie mentioning Parker, so it's not they are close to him. 
    • I’ve reached the summer of 1998.  Until now, my impression has been that the show has steadily improved since the great quality dip of 1994, reaching as high as 8/10 in 1997. Sure, I could complain about a few things in 1997 (Claudia got wasted after her initial storyline; Thorne’s feelings for Taylor were a bit too sudden; the storyline where Sheila lived with James and Maggie while pregnant got rather boring; Mike periodically revisiting Sheila despite being on the run from authorities), but overall it was a very strong year.  I liked the Thorne/Taylor/Ridge triangle, the mystery plot about who shot Grant, the sham wedding to trap Sheila, Stephanie/Eric/Lauren, and Clarke manipulating his way back to working at Forrester. I even liked the Greenland storyline with Eric/Lauren/Rush, although I had expected to hate it. Maybe 1996 tops 1997 in raw soapy excitement (especially as Sheila got a chance to interact with a larger canvas of characters), but certain problems with overall storyline cohesion puts it somewhat below 1997 for me. Unfortunately, early 1998 has turned out to be a bit of a speedbump, perhaps on par with 1995 levels of quality: - Maggie’s character really got trashed after James left her to be with Sheila, and the early 1998 storylines where she imprisoned Sheila in the house from Psycho, or installed those wires and mikes and such in her house to make her think she’s going crazy, were total GARBAGE. So much so that the latter storyline (and Maggie with it) pretty much disappeared into a limbo.  - I have mixed feelings about the twins plotline with Lauren. No way did Rush survive being shot with a crossbow through the chest, and the romance between Lauren and Rush’s good twin brother Johnny was rather dry to me. I did however enjoy the camp aspect of Rush taking his brother’s place to be with Lauren, and Eric rescuing her. But it doesn’t appear like Bell cared too much about the Johnny/Lauren romance beyond the twin storyline gimmick, and it too disappeared in an unsatisfactory manner (come on, why not hire Johnny’s actor for just 5 more episodes for an arc where he realizes Lauren is not over Eric, or JUST SOMETHING?) - Clarke wormed his way back to FC in late 1997, which had exciting storytelling potential, but then he disappeared almost entirely. Sad to see my favorite character wasted in this manner. Does he get anything interesting to do between now and the Morgan saga of 2000-2001? - The Thomas saga was entertaining in 1997, but it got stretched out too much, and made some of early 1998 tiresome, with Ridge having to decide YET AGAIN which woman he wants to be with. On the plus side, I like the plotline of Thorne being neighbors with Macy and Grant, and we’ve finally been introduced to the SORASed Rick/Amber/CJ crowd. The Stephanie/James/Sheila triangle is also starting, and it makes me excited (I remember seeing some if it in my childhood). I know Sheila, Grant, and James are all leaving soon, which I honestly kind of dread - between them and Clarke’s near-absence, it feels like herd is going to get culled too much in the near future. But I know there’s the familiar 1999-2002 to look forward to.
    • LOL - this is a perfect description, and that's what I loved about it! May be a bit campy, but it immediately caught my attention in a good way.  I'm not familiar with the Fishing Trip storyline, I'll have to look that up. I've noticed that about Josh, which has made him less attractive to me overall. He just yells a lot when he's not happy. Wow, Reva was married to HB!  LOL - "Always... eventually, and again"
    • I love your ideas. I would love to see Jack grown up this confused unhinged individual. He should hold a grudge against both Brooke and Taylor.   
    • @chrisml

      Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy