Members victorlord75 Posted July 10, 2015 Members Share Posted July 10, 2015 I don't recall Satterfield being that bad of an actor, but, I had seen most of his work in the beginning of his run as Paul, not his later material. That was in 1991, which I think from a writing standpoint, was probably the worst writing year in GH history, with the most rapid succession of writing staff comings and goings for the show not seen before or since, (I think the one common denominator was Norma Monty in 1991) Then, If I remember right, 1977 was the next worst for writing staff changes. I blame the revolving door of writers if fans considered Paul boring. As I remember it, when Paul first appeared they really didn't know what they wanted the character to be, which subsequently, ruined the character later on for faithful viewers. I don't think it was Satterfield's fault. I do hope that this time, there is focus on who and what Paul is supposed to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.